Category Archives: False Flag Operations

Solving the 911 Mystery (Part 1): The Israeli Connection

“The deathly precision of the attacks and the magnitude of planning would have required years of planning. Such a sophisticated operation would require the fixed frame of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a loose group like the one led by the student Mohammed Atta in Hamburg.” -Eckehardt Werthebach (Former President of Germany’s Verfassungsschutz Intelligence Service)

As you’re no doubt well aware, this year marks the 15th Anniversary of the 911 Attacks, which claimed the lives of close to 3,000 people. During the past 15 years, America has not only been irrevocably been transformed into complete corporate fascist police state put into perpetual high alert and fear of a nebulous enemy that are almost always Arab and/or Muslim, but our country has also embarked upon the dangerous and bloody business of fighting wars abroad in the name of the oxymoron slogan “War on Terror”, wherein the US claims to be preemptively targeting “state-sponsors of terrorism”. However, what if some the biggest state-sponsors of terrorism were actually considered our closest political allies? And, what if there were credible evidence that some of the real architects of the 911 Attacks weren’t Afghani, Pakistani, or even Saudi but actually Israeli? Would you really want to know? While this evidence is considered controversial, even among many within the 911 Truth movement, I believe that it is some of the most compelling and substantial evidence there is in determining just who the guilty culprits involved in the 911 actually are. Unfortunately, you will never see a true unbiased investigation into the events of September 11th, 2001 by either the US government or the mainstream media in this country. Therefore, it is up to the alternative media like Para-Political Journal to take it up.

solving-911-book

For a much fuller and detailed account of the Israeli Connection to 911, I highly suggest you read Christopher Bollyn’s book Solving 911: The Deception That Changed The WorldI picked up a copy from Bollyn himself, who gave an excellent talk at the recent “911 Truth Fest” in Austin, TX on the 15th Year Anniversary. You can watch the entirety of the Fest on-line that is now archived on Livestream by the host, Ron Avery, or simply start it around the     1 hr. 13 min. mark to see Christopher Bollyn’s stellar presentation. Needless to say, he’s an extremely courageous man to be writing and speaking about this little known and under investigated aspect of 911, even though it goes straight to the heart of some of the culprits in what is clearly a false-flag attack, since to broach this topic in media circles is certain career suicide along with being labeled a “Crazy Conspiracy Theorist” and (even worse in the public domain) an “Anti-Semite”. However, how many people know what the current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu actually said the day after September 11th, 2001? As the New York Times reported:

Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu replied, “It’s very good.” Then, he edited himself: “Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.”

Much later on, in April of 2008, the Israeli newspapers Haaretz and Ma’ariv reported on Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech at Bar Ilan university where he said:

“We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq.”

netanyahu

He went on to say that it was 911 attacks that swung opinion to Israel’s favor. Of course, Benjamin Netanyahu is a hardliner member of the Likud Party, which is the Israeli equivalent of the Neocon, wherein it is vehemently pro-Zionist and very hawkish in matters pertaining to the daily sufferings of the Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza. When you consider how the Apartheid State of Israel wants to topple certain Middle Eastern regimes it considers threats to its security as well as continue its illegal territorial expansions into the Golan Heights, the Sinai, Jordan, Lebanon, and even parts of Syria– it begins to make strategic sense from a Machiavellian point of view, of course, why Israel would seek to manipulate the US into fighting proxy wars on its behalf. After all, if you can use the full power and weight of the most powerful military force on the planet to do the fighting and dying…then you can preserve your own military from undertaking such an arduous task and deflect some of the enmity of your neighbors towards your very useful tool, while getting rid of your enemies all in one fell swoop. Also, let’s not forget that among the Project for the New American Century gang that ushered in the Bush-Cheney Neocons were Zionists like Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Donald Rumsfeld, Robert Kagan, Elliot Abrams, and William Kristol, who could push the Bush Administration into a war against Iraq irregardless of their complete non-involvement with Al-Qaida and the Taliban.

In addition to a clear geo-political motive and the ideological parallels between Bush Cabinet PNAC Neocons and their Likud Zionist counterparts, there is also evidence that Israeli Intelligence (specifically Mossad) has penetrated into the deepest levels of our government, telecommunications industry, security systems, aviation industry, and high-level software and technology infrastructure to the point that it could feasibly pull off an operation as sophisticated as the 911, particularly if we consider the fact that jet fuel alone couldn’t have possibly brought down the Twin Towers. Once you’ve studied the voluminous evidence of Active Thermitic Material found in the dust debris at Ground Zero as Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, David Ray Griffin, BYU Physics Professor Steven Jones and his team of scientists that wrote an in-depth scientific published in a peer-reviewed chemical journal did exhaustively– the natural question that arises is, “Who had the kind of lengthy access to the elevator shafts, various floors inside the building, and control over the security in order to place tons of explosive super thermitic material throughout the WTC Complex for its eventual destruction, including the 47 story building of WTC 7 that was never hit by any plane that day?” Let’s consider this crucial evidence, including that of controlled demolition of the World Trade Center buildings.

First, let’s recall that the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) began investigating a group of Israelis posing as “Art Students” back in January of 2000, who had penetrated a number of major US government facilities. While it is known that Israeli criminal gangs are some of the major traffickers of the drug Ecstasy, these spies also managed to penetrate places like Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma City that houses the AWACS surveillance craft and Stealth Bombers. According to various news reports once the story was leaked to the press by the DEA, some 120 Israeli nationals were apprehended and exported on VISA violations although many are thought to remain at large. The question is- “Who authorized this massive spying operation into sensitive US government facilities?” And, what (if anything) did it have to do with 911, as it was certainly ongoing up through Sept. 11th 2001?

israelis-detained-are-classified

FOX News Correspondent, Carl Cameron, broke this story in the US media with a 4 Part Report that covered not only the “Art Student” spy ring but also Israeli control over a telecommunications system called Amdocs, which was funneling practically every US phone call directly to Israel. He also spoke about the rarely mentioned scandal of a small software company called P-Tech that was raided by the FBI after it was determined to have connections with known terrorist sympathizers. P-Tech software was being run on FAA and NORAD computers and could exploit holes in their systems to in effect cause the kind of mass confusion and chaos we saw that day in communications and the delays in scrambling fighter jets, which hasn’t been officially accounted for. We’ll come back to detail P-Tech later, since it’s a crucial link in the 911 operation. Unfortunately, Carl Cameron’s groundbreaking revelations never were picked up by any other major media outlet, and FOX News even yanked the article from their website shortly after it was posted. When asked about it on C-SPAN, Carl Cameron seemed to think that FOX News was merely making room for greater news coverage of the war, but (having seen censorship operate before on sensitive stories) I’m not buying that explanation as to why it was taken out of the archives. Fortunately, another 911 researcher by the name of Rebekah Roth followed the bread crumbs to some very interesting pictures that revealed one of the most “explosive” revelations as to what some of these Mossad spies posing as “Art Students” were doing on a floor inside the World Trade Center. Check out her video on YouTube where she describes what she discovered, and make up your own mind about what exactly it means in the larger context of 911.

We also now know that Israelis were given an early warning not to come to work that day in Lower Manhattan. This is because someone using Odigo, which is one of the largest “instant messaging” companies and has its headquarters two blocks from the WTC, sent out an early warning message to at least two of its employees that there was going to be an attack in New York some two hours before it actually happened. According to a Vice President for Odigo, the messaging system has a feature that allows it send messages based on particular interests and demographics. In other words, you can specify a message to be sent based on someone’s nationality like say…Israeli.

odigo

In addition to the curious early warning to Odigo employees, the Zim-American Israeli Shipping Co. apparently also showed signs that they knew what was coming and vacated their 16th Floor offices in the WTC one week prior to the 911 attacks. The Zim Shipping Co. had announced some 6 months before that they were moving to Norfolk, VA, and there were only 10 employees out of more than 200 left in the building on 911. However, all ten managed to escape alive. The only Israeli company still left in the WTC Towers is called ClearForest that had about 18 employees, and the handful in the building that day all were able to escape in time. Interestingly, the Israeli government actually owns half of the Zim Shipping Co.

There was another shipping/trucking company that was being used as a Mossad front on 911 that is even stranger than Zim. This company is called Urban Moving Systems, and its owner is a man by the name of Dominic Suter. The FBI told ABC News that “Urban Moving Systems may have been providing cover for an Israeli intelligence operation.” The reason for their suspicions about Urban Moving Systems were raised when a woman calls police and the FBI regarding “Five Dancing Israelis”, who were seen filming the burning WTC Towers from the roof of their company’s building. The witness to this bizarre event described them as mocking of the day’s disaster with obvious expressions of happiness and joy. When the police pulled over their “Urban Moving Systems” labeled van, one man is found with $4,700 in his sock and another had two passports on his person. According to the local investigators, they found “maps of the city in the car with certain places highlighted”. As one of the officials described, “It looked like they’re hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen.” You can now even hear the actual police dispatch voice recordings of when they found an Urban Moving Systems van painted with mural depicting a plane flying into the Twin Towers. The FBI later discovers that at least two of them, the brothers Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, are Mossad agents. Although the FBI supposedly interrogates them for weeks, they are released 71 days after their arrest on immigration violations and return to Israel. Three of them (Oded Ellner, Omer Marmari, and Yari Shmuel) even go on Israeli television to talk about the whole ordeal. Are we supposed to believe that this was simply bureaucratic snafu and slip up?

israeli-art-student-spies

One report speculated that the “Israeli Art Student” spy ring investigated by the DEA was so sloppy and brazen that it was a diversion or decoy to the real Mossad spy ring that could accomplish its goals much more professionally undetected. This makes sense insofar as the art of spy craft goes. However, even with so many “decoys” being caught with box cutters, high-lighted maps, video tapes of sky scrappers, multiple passports, computer hard drives, abnormal amounts of cash, residue from explosive material, etc., why were they were all let go after a brief period of detention? In other words, no matter how guilty they seemed to be or actually were in their espionage, surveillance, and covert operations to bring the WTC Towers down via nano-thermite as Steven Jones, Richard Gage, David Ray Griffin, etc. have shown, they were totally immune to prosecution for their crimes. Clearly, they have friends in very high places to include the FBI, CIA, and White House. In the case of the FBI, for example, the Assistant Attorney General was Michael Chertoff. As Christopher Bollyn says, “Having a dedicated Zionist agent in the key position, as Assistant Attorney General controlling the criminal division of the Department of Justice, gave the Israelis the operational security to carry out this massive crime without fear of exposure or prosecution. It should be noted that Chertoff also played a key role in the prosecution of the 1993 false-flag terror bombing at the World Trade Center.”

michael-chertoff

Needless to say, what I’ve presented so far in this article is just the tip of a very dirty, complex, and suppressed iceberg of complicity via the Israeli Connection to the crimes of 911. And, even this is just one part of an even larger conspiracy that involves a financial coup, which if you knew the details of would stagger your imagination. However, the important thing to keep in mind when considering the huge scope of the largest single day mass murder in American history is to not fixate on any one anomaly or even several anomalies to the event (interesting though they may be) in isolation but rather to attempt to piece together all those anomalous news stories, buried in the back pages of the US media and more prominently displayed in the foreign media, in order to begin to see the real overall picture and narrative as to what took place that day.

In other words, you have to begin to think “conspiratorially” as well along the lines of-“Who was in control of the architectural, managerial, operational, and working level of the 911 attacks?” And, you have to look at the choke points of the entire operation to know how it can not only override the regular operating procedures and protocol that day such as shipping the scrap iron to particular junk yards where it can be cut up and shipped to Asian recycling plants to be melted down. These are the kinds of questions that have to not only be asked but answered correctly, if you’re ever going to get to the truth along with obvious ones like “Qui Bono?”. Much more to come in Part 2 of this series.

israelis-caught-on-911-with-explosives

 

 

Advertisements

Unanswered Questions, Intelligence Connections, and Political Considerations in the Orlando Nightclub Shooting

The previous month of June has been a very busy and deadly month in the annals of para-politics, and it therefore deserves close personal scrutiny (on my part) to attempt to sort it all out. So, in lieu of discussing further examples of the medical mafia’s malfeasance and suppression of alternative medicine as I had planned to do as an addendum to my previous article, I’d like to address what is clearly the most pressing news of the day, namely the Orlando Shooting and in another article I’ll address the recent Turkish Airport terrorist attack and perhaps the Bangladesh restaurant attack within the overall context of global terrorism and the “strategy of tension”.

Let’s first look closely at what is being described as the deadliest mass shooting in US history that occurred at a gay nightclub in the early morning hours of June 12th in Orlando, since there are several things about what’s being reported that (to my inquisitive mind at least) don’t completely add up. According to the “official” news about this horrific tragedy, a young 29-year-old man named Omar Mateen walked into the Pulse nightclub armed with an AR-15 and Glock semi-automatic pistol and began firing on the patrons at around 2:00 a.m. whereupon 6-7 police officers entered the building and exchanged fire until he retreated the bathroom. We are then told that he called 911 at least three times where he claimed allegiance to ISIS and made a series of threats to kill more people. According to the official narrative, he then engaged with hostage negotiators for about three hours until police tried to blow a hole in the wall of the bathroom with explosives that failed to produce a sizable enough hole. Then, they used a Bearcat to bulldoze a hole in the wall where dozens of people were able to escape and SWAT was able to enter. Omar Mateen came out “all guns blazing” and was promptly shot several times until he died. When the smoke had cleared, however, 53 were injured and 49 laid dead (including Mateen) in the aftermath.

Pulse Nightclub Walls

Naturally, the country was once again put into a state of fearful anxiety about the threat of radical Islamic extremists, who could strike at any moment against perceived enemies of Allah such as homosexuals (gasp!) or any other non-Muslim group. And, this paranoia was quickly politicized by the thankfully limited minority body of Democrats in the House and Senate to pass yet more legislation to further restrict the 2nd Amendment by throwing an emotionally-overwrought tantrum at the capitol until they got their way. Fortunately, it hasn’t worked this time, particularly since the no-fly list created by Homeland Security is notoriously inept. However, you can bet that if Hillary Clinton gets into the White House, the 2nd Amendment will be shot so full of holes that it could very well die (if you’ll pardon the pun). Of course, Hillary isn’t against her personal security detail carrying guns (machine guns included)…just you pesky peasants out there she’s worried about.

Hillary Clinton Armed Security Detail

However, there are several things about this narrative that don’t make much sense to me. First of all, Omar Mateen was said to have been under previous investigations by the FBI, but they were later dropped. So, right away, we know that the FBI knew who he was, who his friends were, and quite probably knew about his political/religious/ideological leanings via tapping his emails, texts, phone calls, Facebook posts, etc. Therefore, when he suddenly decided to purchase an AR-15 and Glock handgun, you can bet that the FBI knew about it and had he been under prior investigation for terrorist affiliations…this would have raised all kinds of red flags. After all, the AR-15 is supposed to be the favorite weapon of these so-called “lone nut” mass shooters like Adam Lanza, who I have serious doubts about as I’ve mentioned previously was even involved other than as a mind-controlled patsy. Ditto for the wannabe Joker at the Aurora Colorado shooting, who was found in what appeared to be a drug-induced daze in his car after the shooting rather than running away as would be expected in such a scenario. Prior to his mass shooting at the Washington Naval Yard, Aaron Alexis was clearly being targeted by electronic low-frequency psychotronic mind-control technology as described by “targeted individuals” (TI’s) to the point where he had even carved the words “MY ELF WEAPON” into the stock of his AR-15. ELF stands for “Extremely Low Frequency”.

In Omar Mateen’s case, several witnesses remember him being at the club prior to the fateful morning of the shooting, which would seem to imply he was a regular patron and hence at least bisexual if not gay himself. However, his father has been interviewed as remembering Omar getting extremely pissed off after he witnessed two guys kissing. If he had been going to gay nightclubs in Florida all along, though, he would be witnessing all kinds of homo-erotic acts likely to be a lot more offensive to a militant Muslim than mere kissing. So, why would he have kept going? Sexual masochism? Was he a closet homosexual himself who sought to avenge his confusing feelings in a cleansing of carnage? Being pure speculation, I won’t comment on it any further. However, if the eye-witness reports are true, he would certainly be susceptible to things like black-mail that could spiral into a murderous rampage.

Omar Mateen Selfie

Another aspect of this case that is very puzzling is the fact that he has been reported to have been working with the largest security company in the world at the time of the shooting, G4S (Group 4 Securitus). This isn’t your average tin-badge wearing security firm driving around Wal-Marts in golf carts. G4S employs some 618,000 people around the world in 125 countries headquartered in London and has multiple divisions within the company that deal with everything from software security to insurance fraud investigations. And, one of the many companies that it has acquired since its inception is Wackenhut, which was notorious for being both extremely corrupt and riddled with intelligence spooks. In fact, back in the COINTELPRO days of the 1960’s it had the deepest and largest files kept on US dissidents of any private organization and was second only to the FBI in terms of domestic spying. At one point, it even held the security contract to guard the perimeter of the infamous Area 51 in the Nevada desert, riding around in White Jeep Cherokees. However, G4F bought Wackenhut back in 2002 merging with Securitus to become G4S, and Wackenhut now makes up a special division within the umbrella company of G4S itself. Now, of course, given what we know of Wackenhut and being used as a CIA domestic cutout…there is every indication that this cutout has now moved into the larger G4S that act as a CIA cover on an even larger scale than before given G4S’s reach globally. And yet, we’ve been told that Omar Mateen (a man who had been under FBI investigation a couple of times; a man who supposedly professed allegiance to ISIS on the 911 calls) passed the psychological background checks for what is one of the largest and most powerfully connected security firms in the world?

G4S Wackenhut

The FBI also refuses to release the 911 call tapes, which would answer some very important questions. They’re claiming it’s out of “respect to the victims’ families”, which I think is completely bogus personally as they’ve never given a damn about victims’ families or even the victims of their own crimes for that matter. Therefore, I’m seriously skeptical about those 911 having been made by Omar prior to them releasing the recordings, let alone what was actually said. After all, why would a mass shooter bother to call 911 to make vague threats when he could be busy making good on those threats instead of wasting time on the phone? And finally, if you look at the recently released FBI time line, it would seem to suggest that the majority of all the deaths occurred after 5:12 a.m. when the SWAT team raided the nightclub. So while the Orlando Police Chief Molina now admits that some of the 49 killed were perhaps killed by the SWAT team in the raid, it is probably more accurate to say that most of those killed in the ensuing chaos were killed by police. This is now the confirmed position of Judge Andrew Napolitano a pundit FOX News, who has been one of the few exceptions in the MSM of a smart analyst of the daily news. Don’t forget that it was Judge Napolitano, who was breaking news about the 911 Able Danger project when nobody else would cover the story and even had former DIA whistle-blower Anthony Shaffer on his show to talk about it.

So, to sum up, there remain a lot of questions about what really happened in the early morning hours of June 12th at the Pulse nightclub, but unfortunately like just about everything else they’ve covered up (Waco, TWA 800, Anthrax Attacks, Newtown, etc.) we aren’t likely to ever get any straight answers from the FBI. And, of course the Orlando Police Department can be easily controlled by the Feds to keep their mouth shut and spin a few more lies when called upon to do so for damage control. However, as I’ve already documented in the article, there are a few leaks already, and I fully expect more holes to develop as time goes on and their official story continues to crumble under the weight of further evidence.

Orlando Nightclub at Night


Crispin Glover, Hollywood Materialism, and 9/11 Predictive Programming

What is It Cover Art

“The United States has it’s own propaganda, but it’s very effective because people don’t realize that it’s propaganda. And it’s subtle, but it’s actually a much stronger propaganda machine than the Nazis had but it’s funded in a different way. With the Nazis it was funded by the government, but in the United States, it’s funded by corporations and corporations they only want things to happen that will make people want to buy stuff. So whatever that is, then that is considered okay and good, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it really serves people’s thinking – it can stupefy and make not very good things happen.” – Crispin Hellion Glover

Recently, I had the distinct opportunity to see “Crispin Glover Live”, where he gave a series of slide show presentations that left me in a state of what I would describe as bemused confusion at what exactly I was witnessing. After all, how does one begin to fully explain what a reading and rendering of a book about the intricacies of rat catching and cadavers from a professional in the field of dissection and listing of anatomical features interspersed with what appear to be a series of drawings, book passages, and black-and-white photographs from the 1950s really mean? Next, he showed his surreal movie “What is It?”, a Jungian-like exploration of the unconscious adventures of a motley cast of characters, mostly with Down Syndrome, that involved a white guy in black face, a running motif of a dissolving snail being salted, and Crispin Glover himself playing some kind of cruel king of the underworld surrounded by a bevy of topless women with animal heads and one grown man in a diaper lying a crib. Honestly, you can’t make this crazy shit up! But, Crispin Glover can and did make this up…creating what I’m sure was one of the greatest WTF moments in many warped peoples’ minds that were lucky enough to be there that night with me at the Alamo Drafthouse.

Most of you, however, probably remember Crispin Glover not from his personal surreal film oddities like the aforementioned “What is It?” but rather his acting in idiosyncratic roles like Dale in David Lynch’s Wild at Heart. It was his breakthrough role as the nerdy and socially-awkward George McFly, who is able to rise to the occasion against his arch nemesis Biff with the help of his future son played by Michael J. Fox, where Crispin Glover became a recognizable actor in Hollywood. Unfortunately, one gets the impression that Hollywood never really fully appreciated his decidedly bizarre choice of characters that were to follow and nor especially the anti-corporate ethos regarding his own creative work. Even on the celebrity talk show circuit, Glover was quickly typecast as a dangerous weirdo, as his appearance on Letterman would clearly show when he was kicked off the show for well…”kicking on the show”.

Crispin Glover in Shades

However, behind the largely unpretentious, darkly humorous, and quirky character turns of Glover lay a much overlooked critical and very perceptive mind that saw the Hollywood system for what it really represented to those unfamiliar with its inner workings. This came out during an enlightening session of Q&A at the end of the movie where Glover talked about the creative straight jacket of Hollywood and how experimental movies such as his own are essentially locked out of any commercial distribution through the main theater chain outlets. This obviously isn’t that surprising given that the commercial theater chains only real objective is to maximize profit on a per screen basis and will quickly cut anything that isn’t pulling in the numbers they want, which is why you rarely see any documentaries playing on the silver screen except in a handful of small theaters that also play indie and foreign films. It was during this Q&A that Crispin Glover spoke about what became something of a defining moment for him. He was working on the set of Back to the Future that would soon make him into a household name with director Robert Zemeckis. Originally, after Marty McFly returned to his new and improved family that now lived in a wealthy neighborhood where the kids all had great professions as opposed to low-paying jobs, the McFly family had a black servant. Glover politely mentioned to the director how this might appear racist to black audiences, and Zemeckis wisely changed the servant to a newly humbled Biff putting a second coat of wax on George McFly’s fancy car. However, the underlying assumption of the movie remained unchanged in Glover’s mind as he relates in this interview on the Opie and Anthony Show where he speaks about the controversy surrounding his feud with Robert Zemeckis.

Back to the Future

So, just what is the subtext of Back to the Future’s ending? “A self-realized and happy existence equals a rich and materialistic life.” Is this the message? Or, am I oversimplifying the underlying message of Back to the Future? Could the onetime yuppie star of the greed obsessed 1980s, Michael J. Fox, who started out as a teenage Reagan wet dream in the sitcom “Family Ties” and graduated to movies that celebrated the ego-centric corporate ladder climbing purpose of life in movies such as The Secret of My Success really be about nothing more profound than the joys of materialism? When Crispin Glover probed the question further, Robert Zemeckis told him point blank- “Listen, I don’t care about artistry. I want to be rich!!” There you have it. And, no doubt with such blockbusters as Forest Gump under his belt, Robert Zemeckis would indeed become rich beyond his wildest dreams as he knew all too well how to cater to audiences’ expectations in terms of what makes for mass entertaining movie. This blockbuster formula would be followed to a “T” even better by Hollywood’s Golden Boy director of the last 40 years, Steven Spielberg, beginning with Jaws released back in 1975.

It is a formula that has been followed perhaps a bit too well over the years, and Glover reserves some particularly pointed barbs for Spielberg that you can see in a classic chapter that he wrote in the brilliantly subversive book, Apocalypse Culture II. Interestingly, the book was edited and published by Adam Parfrey of Feral House, who also just so happens to play the Minstrel character in Glover’s “What is It?” movie mentioned previously. I specifically asked Crispin Glover about the comments he made in Apocalypse Culture II and Spielberg (in particular) for those in attendance that were unfamiliar with the book, and he reiterated again how he didn’t like Steven Spielberg movies at all and thought that they were totally subservient to the corporate ethos. In fact, he said that the only movie he somewhat liked of Spielberg’s entire oeuvre was A.I. that was released as something of a homage to Stanley Kubrick after he died and never got the chance to do the film. Kubrick told Spielberg that he thought he should do the movie instead given his worries that he might make the movie too cerebral, whereas we all know we needn’t worry about Spielberg making something too intellectually probing. However, while I would agree with Glover that A.I. had some rather interesting philosophical themes, I too wish that Kubrick had been the one to make the movie, since I’m sure he would have made a much more profound and interesting film.

At one point in Apocalypse Culture II, Glover chastises Spielberg for completely missing the point of Kubrick’s philosophy as when Spielberg calls Kubrick’s movies “hopeful”. He then rhetorically asks, “Was A Clockwork Orange hopeful? Was Full Metal Jacket hopeful?” Clearly, one begins to wonder just how Spielberg was seeing these movies if indeed he was seeing them at all. Kubrick was often criticized for portraying humanity as too dark, too unethical, and too morally ambiguous…but hopeful? Hardly a word I would use to describe his work. This isn’t to say that there weren’t little moments in his pictures like his future wife, Christiane, singing a German folk song to a group of hardened WWI French soldiers in Paths of Glory that didn’t tap into a kind of universal sentimental zeitgeist, but (unlike Spielberg) he was not a “sentimental” director in the sense of mawkishly milking emotionalism within his movies to garner greater appreciation and recognition. In other words, he saw deeply into much of the dark abyss that lies within men’s souls and wasn’t afraid to portray it on screen without apology and without the usual formulaic redemption scene that accompanies most Hollywood movies that touch on the darker aspects of humanity these days. That shows real courage, in my opinion, instead of merely skillfully manipulating an audience’s emotions to love the hero, hate the villain, and be roused from their seats with a John Williams score and “happily ever after ending”. Even the late, great director Sidney Lumet once quipped that he couldn’t stand American audiences because- “They are totally sentimental.” I would wholeheartedly agree with at least this sentiment and add (due to this) also highly predictable in their tastes.

Apocalypse Culture II

What is even more interesting, however, about a movie like Back to the Future is that it has scenes of predictive programming woven into the plot that (if you watch carefully) actually predict what will occur on September 11th, 2001. How does a movie that came out in 1985 predict perhaps the single most important geopolitical event of the last 40 years some 31 years in the future? It would certainly seem highly unlikely that scenes in the Back to the Future franchise foreshadowing 9/11 were mere coincidence. So, for instance, the mall where Marty and Doc meet to test the Delorean time machine took place at Twin Pines mall, a reference to the Twin Towers. Also, if you turn the clock upside down, it reads 9:11. Later in the movie, the Twin Pines are replaced with a Lone Pine. Why? Also, when Doc sets up a rig to wire the electricity from a lightning strike into the time machine so that Marty can leap back into the future from 1955 to 1985, the hands on the clock tower are set at 9 and 11. Marty then tries to warn Doc about the future where he will be shot by Muslim terrorists at the mall for stealing plutonium. Get that last part? Something sounds awfully familiar and fishy about this plot. In Back to the Future I and II, there are also similar signs and symbols throughout that act as a form of “psychic programming” about the assassination of John F. Kennedy. As an example, there is the town square that is an exact replica of the layout of Dealy Plaza in Dallas where in a storefront window has a severed head of JFK. This is also the same block where the Delorean time machine is struck by lightning, which is symbolic of the assassination itself in the motorcade. Finally, just to drive the point home, the movie Back to the Future II was released on November 22nd. Ring a bell, anyone?

Hollywood movies are notorious for “predictive programming” that I believe act like subconscious triggering mechanisms that both condition the public for what is to come and signal to those “in the know” what could be described as a kind of sick inside joke for the cabal orchestrating these false-flags and psy-ops. It’s their way of absolving themselves through a kind of occult admission and public submission through hiding their handiwork in plain sight, as it were. Or, as Stanley Kubrick would have it, you watch these films with Eyes Wide Shut whereas they can read the subtext, programming, symbolism, numerology, and sorcery behind the overt plot of the movie. Granted, not all movies are embedded with such layers of meaning and predictive programming, but those that are would certainly be popular enough to do their job on the public psyche at large, which by now is global. Unfortunately, for the vast majority of Americans, this would be considered virtual lunacy to bring up in mixed conversation and naturally most all movie critics are completely oblivious to this topic. That is because we are “symbolic illiterate”, whereas secret societies like the Scottish Rite of Freemasons (especially in the higher degrees) are symbol literate.

Albert Pike

All symbols be they corporate logos, political emblems, or religious iconography has layers of meaning that can be traced through time immemorial and throughout various historical cultures, each one of which may have imbued it with their own particular nexus of meaning and purpose. And, as Carl G. Jung spoke about, there are those ancient and archaic symbols that stir in us what some have referred to as genetic memory to the point where they might as well be etched onto our very DNA. This is what he called “archetypes of the collective unconscious”. Naturally, it would behoove us greatly to know from whence these symbols first arose and what their deeper occult meaning is as understood by the mystery schools throughout the ages, but we are woefully uneducated about these matters and can therefore be triggered (and consequently manipulated) with certain symbols that are used by adepts within the media. This need not be the case, however, and I would urge you to take a crash course in “Symbolic Literacy” by either picking up a few books on the subject, checking out the work of modern symbolist and mythologist Michael Tsarion, and/or reading some of the excellent articles on the subject at http://www.vigilantcitizen.com/


Were Top US Commanders Fired for Refusing to Participate in a Nuclear False-Flag Attack?

Back in September 2013, there was a major shake up taking place within the military that we have yet to fully understand the ramifications of, and given the inherent secrecy by which this government plows its wares…we may never fully know all the details. Such is the nature of the cryptocracy (or as Jim Marrs would say) “Rule by Secrecy”. So, keep in mind that, while the evidence for what I am going to assert might have happened is scant, I felt compelled to at least report it in the hopes that someone, who does have substantial evidence one way or another might come forward and provide a couple of leaks to break this mystery open once and for all. With that preface said, let’s now get into the story at hand.

In the November 2013 edition of InfoWars Magazine, Anthony Gucciardi wrote an article entitled “Top Nuke Commanders Terminated Following Missing Nuclear Warheads Report” after he had already broken the story on Alex Jones’ website in October. He goes on to relate how Navy Vice Admiral Tim Giardina and Major General Michael Carey were both fired following a secret nuclear warheads transfer that took place (off the record and without a paper trail) from Dyess Air Force Base in Texas to South Carolina. According to Gucciardi, these two top nuclear commanders suspensions and firings were not supposed to be reported by the media, but an insider was able to leak the story to the Associated Press. The AP (picked up by the UK Guardian) ended up reporting that, “An internal email obtained by the AP on Friday said the allegations against Carey stem from an inspector general probe of his behavior while on an unspecified ‘temporary duty assignment’. The email said the allegations are not related to the operational readiness of the ICBM force or recent failed inspections of ICBM units.”

Mainstream media reports would cover some of the high-level military commander firings in a way that would lead the public to believe that it was also the result of behavior problems like “gambling with counterfeit poker chips”, “making racially insensitive remarks”, and other very minor infractions, even for a low-level grunt. Are we really supposed to think that the #2 man in the nuclear command hierarchy and other very highly ranked officers were suspended and/or relieved of duty because of minor behavior problems? It seems quite absurd on its face. However, what might have been the real reason?

This is where it gets interesting but also (naturally) quite difficult to prove. Needless to say, there are some strange coincidences that become even stranger, when looked at in different perspective and in hindsight with what we know now. First, we know that the Obama Administration attempted to launch cruise missiles against Syria in an effort to topple the Assad government but was “dissuaded” in no uncertain terms by Vladimir Putin in his talks with Secretary of State, John Kerry, and his discussions with the UN Security Council about the lack of convincing evidence that the chemical weapon attacks in Eastern Ghouta were the work of Bashir Assad’s government.

We have since learned that Putin was right in asserting that the sarin gas attack that Obama was attempting to blame on the Syrian government was in all likelihood used by the Jahbat al-Nusra Al-Qaeda type rebels outside of a Damascus suburb in order to generate the necessary justification for an attack. Thanks to the work of independent investigators and reported widely by Global Research…we also know that it was Saudi intelligence agents that shipped the cylinders of deadly gas to their proxy fighters in their on-going battle against Assad. However, it took Putin to put his foot down to dispel the US from embarking on its insane attack against Syria that would have put it one step closer to its ultimate goal of Iran. How long this tenuous stalemate will last is anyone’s guess, but (at least in the short-term) what could have been a very ugly conflict that might have sparked off WWIII was averted. So, that’s a little background in order to better understand the context of what follows.

Shortly after Alex Jones’ InfoWars and Gucciardi, specifically, reported the nuclear commanders being suspended and fired- Sen. Lindsey Graham (who just so happens to head up the Senate Intelligence Subcommittee) came out and said that “a nuclear attack” could come against Charleston Harbor in the event that we did not move militarily against Syria and Iran. He never clarified what he was talking about here. Graham merely said that a South Carolina or New York port could be hit by a terrorist attack using a dirty nuclear bomb. Then, to make things even more suspicious that perhaps Senator Lindsey Graham was made privy to a false-flag nuclear attack that was going to be pinned onto Syria and/or Iran, a 4.5 quake was registered off the coast of South Carolina on October 8th.

And, there is evidence from certain military insiders that the Strategic Missile Force (SMF) has gone on the record as saying that the quake was caused by a….(drum roll) mini-nuclear explosion! Could these high-level nuclear commanders have disobeyed a direct order from the president and detonated the low yield mini-nuke underwater far from the devastating effects that would have ensued had they followed orders to ship their cargo somewhere in the populated confines of South Carolina territory? This is my nagging suspicion that (although I can’t quite prove just yet) is certainly indicative of this duplicitous administration and the reprisals that have been made against anyone that gets in their way. Let’s hope that moral courage will prevail over the devious and insane designs of those, who would orchestrate such a disastrous catastrophe on American soil and pull us into another brutal war abroad while further eviscerating civil liberties at home.

English: DOHA. With the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh ...

English: DOHA. With the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani. Русский: ДОХА. С Эмиром Катара шейхом Хамадом бен Халифой аль-Тани. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)


“Usama Bin Laden Death Files”- The Coverup Continues with Help from the Navy and the CIA

English: Osama bin Laden interviewed for Daily...

English: Osama bin Laden interviewed for Daily Pakistan in 1997; behind him on the wall is an AK-47 carbine. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Recently, important evidence was made completely inaccessible to the public and the media in the continued coverup of the “so-called raid that killed Usama bin Laden” back in May 2011. According to Global Research, the Vice Admiral of the Navy, William McRaven, was primarily responsible for moving all of the “death files” data from the Pentagon to the CIA, which makes it exempt from disclosure to the AP, Reuters, UPI, or any personal FOIA request for that matter.

So, despite president Barrack Obama’s promise of making his administration more “transparent”, this is yet another example of how his administration is actually one of the most secretive in history. Clearly, the “official” narrative of the killing of bin Laden is falling apart at the seams, beginning with their claim that they wouldn’t release the pictures of bin Laden’s dead body because it might incite further violence or be used as a propaganda tool. We were assured that it was him by a president that could use a good jump start to his bid for re-election with a propaganda device of his own making. And, in order to coverup the entire hoax as to who it was they really killed, the body was dumped at sea.

Prior to the raid by SEAL Team 6, there were already prominent officials and media sources, who went on the record as saying that bin Laden was already dead as long ago as December 2001. Even Benazir Bhutto, in a censored interview she gave with the BBC before she was assassinated in 2007, claimed that Usama bin Laden was killed by Omar Sheik, who was a CIA asset. Others claim that he died from complications from kidney failure or typhoid, since it was widely known that he was on dialysis and very ill. However he may have died, one thing is abundantly clear…the photographs that were published the mainstream media claiming to be pictures of a dead bin Laden were obvious fakes.

Furthermore, most of the residents in the city of Abbottabad, Pakistan weren’t buying the “official story” of events either, especially when one considers that Abbottabad is the home of a major military army base and training center and yet supposedly didn’t know about bin Laden living there. The video the Pentagon released without sound, that the US claimed was bin Laden watching himself on TV, was an obvious forgery (just like all the other forgeries) and the people of Pakistan certainly weren’t believing any of the propaganda pieces being spun in their media.

Another fake photo-op was the famous picture of president Obama and members of his cabinet supposedly watching the raid on “closed circuit” TV in the White House “Situation Room”. The problem with this scenario is that Jim Lehrer of PBS News interviewed CIA Director, Leon Panetta, and was told that there was a blackout of the “live video” taken by SEAL Team 6 of the raid inside the fortified compound.

There are also indications that part of the ongoing coverup might very well include killing members of SEAL Team 6, who went on the May 1st raid, to keep them from talking about what really happened. SEALs such as Brett Shadle and Job W. Price have already died in what were reported to be a parachute accident and a suicide, respectively. However, given what they might have said about the bin Laden operation, I now have my doubts, and I’m apparently not the only one. While families of SEAL Team 6 are pissed off at Obama for leaking what spec-op group was even involved in the raid, the government won’t tell us the names of those men, who were actually involved personally.

However, I wouldn’t be surprised if quite a few of those members that were involved in the raid and many others in a great position to know some of the finer details were killed over eastern Afghanistan back in August 2011, when their NATO Chinook helicopter was hit by a RPG (Rocket Propelled Grenade). Of the 38 men and one dog aboard the helicopter, at least 22 were confirmed to have been members of SEAL Team 6 according to the New York Times. Most Americans, unfortunately, will likely remain willfully ignorant by swallowing the whole stinking lie of CIA propaganda videos, television shows, and Hollywood movies that support the official myth like Zero Dark Thirty, making a mockery of the truth. The old adage certainly holds firm in this case that- “Truth is the first casualty of war.”

Pete Souza, Official White House Photographer

Pete Souza, Official White House Photographer (Photo credit: Wikipedia)


Was the USS Liberty Attacked by Israel on LBJ’s Orders as Part of a False-Flag?

English: USS Liberty (AGTR-5) receives assista...

English: USS Liberty (AGTR-5) receives assistance from units of the Sixth Fleet, after she was attacked and seriously damaged by Israeli forces off the Sinai Peninsula on 8 June 1967. An SH-3 helicopter is near her bow. Русский: Высадка спасателей на USS “Liberty”, повреждённый в инциденте 8 июня 1967 г. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

In June of 1967, the American spy vessel USS Liberty was viciously attacked by Israeli Mirage fighter jets, helicopter gun ships, and torpedo boats off the coast of the Egyptian Sinai. Additionally, it has also been repeatedly marginalized by the US media as well as stonewalled in regards in to further “official” investigations. However controversial the case may be, it is important to get to the bottom of the story as to, not only what occurred that day the Liberty was attacked but, know the reason(s) as to why it was attacked in the first place.

The USS Liberty was operated by the NSA and was sailing  in international waters off the coast of the Egyptian Sinai and the Gaza strip during the “6th Day War”. The sky was perfectly clear, and the ship was also clearly flying a US flag. However, this didn’t stop Israeli fighter jets and helicopters from attempting to sink it with numerous rockets, shells, and even napalm that killed some 34 crewmen and injured around 170 others out of a total crew of 294.

Official accounts of the USS Liberty attack say that it was a horrible accident of “mistaken identity” by the Israelis, and the US generally concurs with this blase assessment. However, what if it not only wasn’t an accident but was intentionally attacked on LBJ’s orders in order to then blame it on Egypt’s then Soviet-leaning Gamel Nasser to justify US involvement in a war with Egypt?

As crazy as this may sound, Judy Morris contends that this is indeed what happened and thankfully was averted, when a clever crewman aboard the Liberty was able to rewire a damaged antennae and call for help in between radio jamming and heavy strafing by Israeli fighters. At one point when the 6th US fleet was finally contacted in a mayday signal by the Liberty during the attack, LBJ overrides the fleet commander’s desire to come the rescue by ordering him to stand down, since, in the words of LBJ, “I don’t want to embarrass our good ally.” Certainly, LBJ wasn’t the least bit adverse to pulling false-flag attacks like the non-existent one in the Gulf of Tonkin.

You may remember how LBJ claimed that the USS Maddox had been torpedoed by the North Vietnamese in international waters leading directly to the “Gulf of Tonkin Resolution” that was used to directly escalate US involvement into a full-blown ground war in Vietnam. Later on, we come to find out that it never even took place as even the History Channel has admitted. This is as good an example as any of the old saying- “Truth is the first casualty of war.” For a lot more on the real story of the USS Liberty attack, be sure to read the article linked below.

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2013/01/the-uss-liberty-israel-president.html#comment-form


Secret Legislation Being Drawn Up to Prevent Evidence into Sandy Hook from Being Made Public

The state’s attorney staff and the governor’s office of Connecticut are secretly working on drawing up legislation that would prevent valuable police evidence into the Sandy Hook shooting from reaching the public domain in what can only be described as an obvious miscarriage of justice and violation of the “public’s right to know”. According to the Hartford Courant (see link below), some of the information that is being suppressed from release in an upcoming bill would prevent photographs, videos, and 9/11 calls made during the Sandy Hook shooting from being made available to the public, as is our collective right under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) once a crime is no longer under active investigation. Making the absurd claim that it helps protect the families from further injury, the state legislature of Connecticut and governor’s office are acting to further deny the public’s right to know what really happened on December 14, 2012 at the Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, when there are still many unanswered questions that remain. This is all taking place, meanwhile, when there is circumstantial evidence that the accused 20-year-old kid, Adam Lanza, wasn’t the real shooter and was merely the scapegoat in an elaborate hoax. And with respect to the idea that it was a hoax, there’s further evidence that some of the so-called aggrieved parents, like Robbie Parker, were nothing more than actors, who were used in a ruse against the American public as part of the Obama administration’s on-going psychological warfare against private gun ownership.

http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-newtown-foi-0522-20130521,0,2316671.story


Congressional Hearings on Boston Bombing Show FBI Had Advanced Warning from the Russians

Along with the heavy fallout from the Benghazi attack that is under congressional inquiry now, the Homeland Security Committee has recently begun an investigation into the Boston Marathon bombing of this past April 15th. Having already investigated a bit about this event, I can tell you that it is looking like a staged false-flag that (under the cover of a drill) was orchestrated by the FBI in conjunction with private contractors, most likely Craft International.

However, I’ll give the full report dealing with that story later on. For now, I encourage you all to watch the congressional hearings on the Boston bombing being aired on C-SPAN over the next week or so to, at the very least, catch longtime AIPAC stooge Sen. Joseph Lieberman and other official dimwits in their lies and maybe even a few Freudian slips.

One thing that is coming out loud and clear in these hearings is that Russian FSB (the current incarnation of the old KGB) warned the FBI and the CIA about the Tsarnaev brothers long before Tamerlane received his so-called terrorist training in his home country of Dagestan, where he was in 2012.

Given that the US have been long-time supporters of the Chechen separatists in a similar way the CIA supported the radical Muslims fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan in the 1980s that we’d be fighting as terrorists post-9/11 , why would Putin and FSB warn the FBI about these guys?

And, more importantly still, why would the FBI and CIA repeatedly ignore these warnings? Or, as is becoming the case, was it all part of a much larger agenda? Clearly, Putin wants the US to stop funding and supplying the Chechen rebels with weapons and classify them as “terrorists” just like we already do constitutionalists. So, it’s conceivable that he set the Tsarnaev brothers up for an operation that would trigger this.

However, that’s not likely to happen given that the FBI wanted the attack to go through either for one of their sting operations or more likely one of their own false-flags to keep the “strategy of tension” alive at home and to justify US intervention in the Caspian Basin region abroad.

So, what’s the end game here? There’s a lot more to this story than meets the eye, and the Tsarnaev brothers are just the patsies for a far larger operation that I’ll discuss in much greater detail in a future post. For now, watch the first hearing of the Boston bombing attack in the link provided. And, stay tuned for more to come.

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/312587-1