Category Archives: The 9/11 File

Solving the 911 Mystery (Part 1): The Israeli Connection

“The deathly precision of the attacks and the magnitude of planning would have required years of planning. Such a sophisticated operation would require the fixed frame of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a loose group like the one led by the student Mohammed Atta in Hamburg.” -Eckehardt Werthebach (Former President of Germany’s Verfassungsschutz Intelligence Service)

As you’re no doubt well aware, this year marks the 15th Anniversary of the 911 Attacks, which claimed the lives of close to 3,000 people. During the past 15 years, America has not only been irrevocably been transformed into complete corporate fascist police state put into perpetual high alert and fear of a nebulous enemy that are almost always Arab and/or Muslim, but our country has also embarked upon the dangerous and bloody business of fighting wars abroad in the name of the oxymoron slogan “War on Terror”, wherein the US claims to be preemptively targeting “state-sponsors of terrorism”. However, what if some the biggest state-sponsors of terrorism were actually considered our closest political allies? And, what if there were credible evidence that some of the real architects of the 911 Attacks weren’t Afghani, Pakistani, or even Saudi but actually Israeli? Would you really want to know? While this evidence is considered controversial, even among many within the 911 Truth movement, I believe that it is some of the most compelling and substantial evidence there is in determining just who the guilty culprits involved in the 911 actually are. Unfortunately, you will never see a true unbiased investigation into the events of September 11th, 2001 by either the US government or the mainstream media in this country. Therefore, it is up to the alternative media like Para-Political Journal to take it up.

solving-911-book

For a much fuller and detailed account of the Israeli Connection to 911, I highly suggest you read Christopher Bollyn’s book Solving 911: The Deception That Changed The WorldI picked up a copy from Bollyn himself, who gave an excellent talk at the recent “911 Truth Fest” in Austin, TX on the 15th Year Anniversary. You can watch the entirety of the Fest on-line that is now archived on Livestream by the host, Ron Avery, or simply start it around the     1 hr. 13 min. mark to see Christopher Bollyn’s stellar presentation. Needless to say, he’s an extremely courageous man to be writing and speaking about this little known and under investigated aspect of 911, even though it goes straight to the heart of some of the culprits in what is clearly a false-flag attack, since to broach this topic in media circles is certain career suicide along with being labeled a “Crazy Conspiracy Theorist” and (even worse in the public domain) an “Anti-Semite”. However, how many people know what the current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu actually said the day after September 11th, 2001? As the New York Times reported:

Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu replied, “It’s very good.” Then, he edited himself: “Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.”

Much later on, in April of 2008, the Israeli newspapers Haaretz and Ma’ariv reported on Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech at Bar Ilan university where he said:

“We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq.”

netanyahu

He went on to say that it was 911 attacks that swung opinion to Israel’s favor. Of course, Benjamin Netanyahu is a hardliner member of the Likud Party, which is the Israeli equivalent of the Neocon, wherein it is vehemently pro-Zionist and very hawkish in matters pertaining to the daily sufferings of the Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza. When you consider how the Apartheid State of Israel wants to topple certain Middle Eastern regimes it considers threats to its security as well as continue its illegal territorial expansions into the Golan Heights, the Sinai, Jordan, Lebanon, and even parts of Syria– it begins to make strategic sense from a Machiavellian point of view, of course, why Israel would seek to manipulate the US into fighting proxy wars on its behalf. After all, if you can use the full power and weight of the most powerful military force on the planet to do the fighting and dying…then you can preserve your own military from undertaking such an arduous task and deflect some of the enmity of your neighbors towards your very useful tool, while getting rid of your enemies all in one fell swoop. Also, let’s not forget that among the Project for the New American Century gang that ushered in the Bush-Cheney Neocons were Zionists like Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Donald Rumsfeld, Robert Kagan, Elliot Abrams, and William Kristol, who could push the Bush Administration into a war against Iraq irregardless of their complete non-involvement with Al-Qaida and the Taliban.

In addition to a clear geo-political motive and the ideological parallels between Bush Cabinet PNAC Neocons and their Likud Zionist counterparts, there is also evidence that Israeli Intelligence (specifically Mossad) has penetrated into the deepest levels of our government, telecommunications industry, security systems, aviation industry, and high-level software and technology infrastructure to the point that it could feasibly pull off an operation as sophisticated as the 911, particularly if we consider the fact that jet fuel alone couldn’t have possibly brought down the Twin Towers. Once you’ve studied the voluminous evidence of Active Thermitic Material found in the dust debris at Ground Zero as Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, David Ray Griffin, BYU Physics Professor Steven Jones and his team of scientists that wrote an in-depth scientific published in a peer-reviewed chemical journal did exhaustively– the natural question that arises is, “Who had the kind of lengthy access to the elevator shafts, various floors inside the building, and control over the security in order to place tons of explosive super thermitic material throughout the WTC Complex for its eventual destruction, including the 47 story building of WTC 7 that was never hit by any plane that day?” Let’s consider this crucial evidence, including that of controlled demolition of the World Trade Center buildings.

First, let’s recall that the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) began investigating a group of Israelis posing as “Art Students” back in January of 2000, who had penetrated a number of major US government facilities. While it is known that Israeli criminal gangs are some of the major traffickers of the drug Ecstasy, these spies also managed to penetrate places like Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma City that houses the AWACS surveillance craft and Stealth Bombers. According to various news reports once the story was leaked to the press by the DEA, some 120 Israeli nationals were apprehended and exported on VISA violations although many are thought to remain at large. The question is- “Who authorized this massive spying operation into sensitive US government facilities?” And, what (if anything) did it have to do with 911, as it was certainly ongoing up through Sept. 11th 2001?

israelis-detained-are-classified

FOX News Correspondent, Carl Cameron, broke this story in the US media with a 4 Part Report that covered not only the “Art Student” spy ring but also Israeli control over a telecommunications system called Amdocs, which was funneling practically every US phone call directly to Israel. He also spoke about the rarely mentioned scandal of a small software company called P-Tech that was raided by the FBI after it was determined to have connections with known terrorist sympathizers. P-Tech software was being run on FAA and NORAD computers and could exploit holes in their systems to in effect cause the kind of mass confusion and chaos we saw that day in communications and the delays in scrambling fighter jets, which hasn’t been officially accounted for. We’ll come back to detail P-Tech later, since it’s a crucial link in the 911 operation. Unfortunately, Carl Cameron’s groundbreaking revelations never were picked up by any other major media outlet, and FOX News even yanked the article from their website shortly after it was posted. When asked about it on C-SPAN, Carl Cameron seemed to think that FOX News was merely making room for greater news coverage of the war, but (having seen censorship operate before on sensitive stories) I’m not buying that explanation as to why it was taken out of the archives. Fortunately, another 911 researcher by the name of Rebekah Roth followed the bread crumbs to some very interesting pictures that revealed one of the most “explosive” revelations as to what some of these Mossad spies posing as “Art Students” were doing on a floor inside the World Trade Center. Check out her video on YouTube where she describes what she discovered, and make up your own mind about what exactly it means in the larger context of 911.

We also now know that Israelis were given an early warning not to come to work that day in Lower Manhattan. This is because someone using Odigo, which is one of the largest “instant messaging” companies and has its headquarters two blocks from the WTC, sent out an early warning message to at least two of its employees that there was going to be an attack in New York some two hours before it actually happened. According to a Vice President for Odigo, the messaging system has a feature that allows it send messages based on particular interests and demographics. In other words, you can specify a message to be sent based on someone’s nationality like say…Israeli.

odigo

In addition to the curious early warning to Odigo employees, the Zim-American Israeli Shipping Co. apparently also showed signs that they knew what was coming and vacated their 16th Floor offices in the WTC one week prior to the 911 attacks. The Zim Shipping Co. had announced some 6 months before that they were moving to Norfolk, VA, and there were only 10 employees out of more than 200 left in the building on 911. However, all ten managed to escape alive. The only Israeli company still left in the WTC Towers is called ClearForest that had about 18 employees, and the handful in the building that day all were able to escape in time. Interestingly, the Israeli government actually owns half of the Zim Shipping Co.

There was another shipping/trucking company that was being used as a Mossad front on 911 that is even stranger than Zim. This company is called Urban Moving Systems, and its owner is a man by the name of Dominic Suter. The FBI told ABC News that “Urban Moving Systems may have been providing cover for an Israeli intelligence operation.” The reason for their suspicions about Urban Moving Systems were raised when a woman calls police and the FBI regarding “Five Dancing Israelis”, who were seen filming the burning WTC Towers from the roof of their company’s building. The witness to this bizarre event described them as mocking of the day’s disaster with obvious expressions of happiness and joy. When the police pulled over their “Urban Moving Systems” labeled van, one man is found with $4,700 in his sock and another had two passports on his person. According to the local investigators, they found “maps of the city in the car with certain places highlighted”. As one of the officials described, “It looked like they’re hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen.” You can now even hear the actual police dispatch voice recordings of when they found an Urban Moving Systems van painted with mural depicting a plane flying into the Twin Towers. The FBI later discovers that at least two of them, the brothers Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, are Mossad agents. Although the FBI supposedly interrogates them for weeks, they are released 71 days after their arrest on immigration violations and return to Israel. Three of them (Oded Ellner, Omer Marmari, and Yari Shmuel) even go on Israeli television to talk about the whole ordeal. Are we supposed to believe that this was simply bureaucratic snafu and slip up?

israeli-art-student-spies

One report speculated that the “Israeli Art Student” spy ring investigated by the DEA was so sloppy and brazen that it was a diversion or decoy to the real Mossad spy ring that could accomplish its goals much more professionally undetected. This makes sense insofar as the art of spy craft goes. However, even with so many “decoys” being caught with box cutters, high-lighted maps, video tapes of sky scrappers, multiple passports, computer hard drives, abnormal amounts of cash, residue from explosive material, etc., why were they were all let go after a brief period of detention? In other words, no matter how guilty they seemed to be or actually were in their espionage, surveillance, and covert operations to bring the WTC Towers down via nano-thermite as Steven Jones, Richard Gage, David Ray Griffin, etc. have shown, they were totally immune to prosecution for their crimes. Clearly, they have friends in very high places to include the FBI, CIA, and White House. In the case of the FBI, for example, the Assistant Attorney General was Michael Chertoff. As Christopher Bollyn says, “Having a dedicated Zionist agent in the key position, as Assistant Attorney General controlling the criminal division of the Department of Justice, gave the Israelis the operational security to carry out this massive crime without fear of exposure or prosecution. It should be noted that Chertoff also played a key role in the prosecution of the 1993 false-flag terror bombing at the World Trade Center.”

michael-chertoff

Needless to say, what I’ve presented so far in this article is just the tip of a very dirty, complex, and suppressed iceberg of complicity via the Israeli Connection to the crimes of 911. And, even this is just one part of an even larger conspiracy that involves a financial coup, which if you knew the details of would stagger your imagination. However, the important thing to keep in mind when considering the huge scope of the largest single day mass murder in American history is to not fixate on any one anomaly or even several anomalies to the event (interesting though they may be) in isolation but rather to attempt to piece together all those anomalous news stories, buried in the back pages of the US media and more prominently displayed in the foreign media, in order to begin to see the real overall picture and narrative as to what took place that day.

In other words, you have to begin to think “conspiratorially” as well along the lines of-“Who was in control of the architectural, managerial, operational, and working level of the 911 attacks?” And, you have to look at the choke points of the entire operation to know how it can not only override the regular operating procedures and protocol that day such as shipping the scrap iron to particular junk yards where it can be cut up and shipped to Asian recycling plants to be melted down. These are the kinds of questions that have to not only be asked but answered correctly, if you’re ever going to get to the truth along with obvious ones like “Qui Bono?”. Much more to come in Part 2 of this series.

israelis-caught-on-911-with-explosives

 

 

Advertisements

Crispin Glover, Hollywood Materialism, and 9/11 Predictive Programming

What is It Cover Art

“The United States has it’s own propaganda, but it’s very effective because people don’t realize that it’s propaganda. And it’s subtle, but it’s actually a much stronger propaganda machine than the Nazis had but it’s funded in a different way. With the Nazis it was funded by the government, but in the United States, it’s funded by corporations and corporations they only want things to happen that will make people want to buy stuff. So whatever that is, then that is considered okay and good, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it really serves people’s thinking – it can stupefy and make not very good things happen.” – Crispin Hellion Glover

Recently, I had the distinct opportunity to see “Crispin Glover Live”, where he gave a series of slide show presentations that left me in a state of what I would describe as bemused confusion at what exactly I was witnessing. After all, how does one begin to fully explain what a reading and rendering of a book about the intricacies of rat catching and cadavers from a professional in the field of dissection and listing of anatomical features interspersed with what appear to be a series of drawings, book passages, and black-and-white photographs from the 1950s really mean? Next, he showed his surreal movie “What is It?”, a Jungian-like exploration of the unconscious adventures of a motley cast of characters, mostly with Down Syndrome, that involved a white guy in black face, a running motif of a dissolving snail being salted, and Crispin Glover himself playing some kind of cruel king of the underworld surrounded by a bevy of topless women with animal heads and one grown man in a diaper lying a crib. Honestly, you can’t make this crazy shit up! But, Crispin Glover can and did make this up…creating what I’m sure was one of the greatest WTF moments in many warped peoples’ minds that were lucky enough to be there that night with me at the Alamo Drafthouse.

Most of you, however, probably remember Crispin Glover not from his personal surreal film oddities like the aforementioned “What is It?” but rather his acting in idiosyncratic roles like Dale in David Lynch’s Wild at Heart. It was his breakthrough role as the nerdy and socially-awkward George McFly, who is able to rise to the occasion against his arch nemesis Biff with the help of his future son played by Michael J. Fox, where Crispin Glover became a recognizable actor in Hollywood. Unfortunately, one gets the impression that Hollywood never really fully appreciated his decidedly bizarre choice of characters that were to follow and nor especially the anti-corporate ethos regarding his own creative work. Even on the celebrity talk show circuit, Glover was quickly typecast as a dangerous weirdo, as his appearance on Letterman would clearly show when he was kicked off the show for well…”kicking on the show”.

Crispin Glover in Shades

However, behind the largely unpretentious, darkly humorous, and quirky character turns of Glover lay a much overlooked critical and very perceptive mind that saw the Hollywood system for what it really represented to those unfamiliar with its inner workings. This came out during an enlightening session of Q&A at the end of the movie where Glover talked about the creative straight jacket of Hollywood and how experimental movies such as his own are essentially locked out of any commercial distribution through the main theater chain outlets. This obviously isn’t that surprising given that the commercial theater chains only real objective is to maximize profit on a per screen basis and will quickly cut anything that isn’t pulling in the numbers they want, which is why you rarely see any documentaries playing on the silver screen except in a handful of small theaters that also play indie and foreign films. It was during this Q&A that Crispin Glover spoke about what became something of a defining moment for him. He was working on the set of Back to the Future that would soon make him into a household name with director Robert Zemeckis. Originally, after Marty McFly returned to his new and improved family that now lived in a wealthy neighborhood where the kids all had great professions as opposed to low-paying jobs, the McFly family had a black servant. Glover politely mentioned to the director how this might appear racist to black audiences, and Zemeckis wisely changed the servant to a newly humbled Biff putting a second coat of wax on George McFly’s fancy car. However, the underlying assumption of the movie remained unchanged in Glover’s mind as he relates in this interview on the Opie and Anthony Show where he speaks about the controversy surrounding his feud with Robert Zemeckis.

Back to the Future

So, just what is the subtext of Back to the Future’s ending? “A self-realized and happy existence equals a rich and materialistic life.” Is this the message? Or, am I oversimplifying the underlying message of Back to the Future? Could the onetime yuppie star of the greed obsessed 1980s, Michael J. Fox, who started out as a teenage Reagan wet dream in the sitcom “Family Ties” and graduated to movies that celebrated the ego-centric corporate ladder climbing purpose of life in movies such as The Secret of My Success really be about nothing more profound than the joys of materialism? When Crispin Glover probed the question further, Robert Zemeckis told him point blank- “Listen, I don’t care about artistry. I want to be rich!!” There you have it. And, no doubt with such blockbusters as Forest Gump under his belt, Robert Zemeckis would indeed become rich beyond his wildest dreams as he knew all too well how to cater to audiences’ expectations in terms of what makes for mass entertaining movie. This blockbuster formula would be followed to a “T” even better by Hollywood’s Golden Boy director of the last 40 years, Steven Spielberg, beginning with Jaws released back in 1975.

It is a formula that has been followed perhaps a bit too well over the years, and Glover reserves some particularly pointed barbs for Spielberg that you can see in a classic chapter that he wrote in the brilliantly subversive book, Apocalypse Culture II. Interestingly, the book was edited and published by Adam Parfrey of Feral House, who also just so happens to play the Minstrel character in Glover’s “What is It?” movie mentioned previously. I specifically asked Crispin Glover about the comments he made in Apocalypse Culture II and Spielberg (in particular) for those in attendance that were unfamiliar with the book, and he reiterated again how he didn’t like Steven Spielberg movies at all and thought that they were totally subservient to the corporate ethos. In fact, he said that the only movie he somewhat liked of Spielberg’s entire oeuvre was A.I. that was released as something of a homage to Stanley Kubrick after he died and never got the chance to do the film. Kubrick told Spielberg that he thought he should do the movie instead given his worries that he might make the movie too cerebral, whereas we all know we needn’t worry about Spielberg making something too intellectually probing. However, while I would agree with Glover that A.I. had some rather interesting philosophical themes, I too wish that Kubrick had been the one to make the movie, since I’m sure he would have made a much more profound and interesting film.

At one point in Apocalypse Culture II, Glover chastises Spielberg for completely missing the point of Kubrick’s philosophy as when Spielberg calls Kubrick’s movies “hopeful”. He then rhetorically asks, “Was A Clockwork Orange hopeful? Was Full Metal Jacket hopeful?” Clearly, one begins to wonder just how Spielberg was seeing these movies if indeed he was seeing them at all. Kubrick was often criticized for portraying humanity as too dark, too unethical, and too morally ambiguous…but hopeful? Hardly a word I would use to describe his work. This isn’t to say that there weren’t little moments in his pictures like his future wife, Christiane, singing a German folk song to a group of hardened WWI French soldiers in Paths of Glory that didn’t tap into a kind of universal sentimental zeitgeist, but (unlike Spielberg) he was not a “sentimental” director in the sense of mawkishly milking emotionalism within his movies to garner greater appreciation and recognition. In other words, he saw deeply into much of the dark abyss that lies within men’s souls and wasn’t afraid to portray it on screen without apology and without the usual formulaic redemption scene that accompanies most Hollywood movies that touch on the darker aspects of humanity these days. That shows real courage, in my opinion, instead of merely skillfully manipulating an audience’s emotions to love the hero, hate the villain, and be roused from their seats with a John Williams score and “happily ever after ending”. Even the late, great director Sidney Lumet once quipped that he couldn’t stand American audiences because- “They are totally sentimental.” I would wholeheartedly agree with at least this sentiment and add (due to this) also highly predictable in their tastes.

Apocalypse Culture II

What is even more interesting, however, about a movie like Back to the Future is that it has scenes of predictive programming woven into the plot that (if you watch carefully) actually predict what will occur on September 11th, 2001. How does a movie that came out in 1985 predict perhaps the single most important geopolitical event of the last 40 years some 31 years in the future? It would certainly seem highly unlikely that scenes in the Back to the Future franchise foreshadowing 9/11 were mere coincidence. So, for instance, the mall where Marty and Doc meet to test the Delorean time machine took place at Twin Pines mall, a reference to the Twin Towers. Also, if you turn the clock upside down, it reads 9:11. Later in the movie, the Twin Pines are replaced with a Lone Pine. Why? Also, when Doc sets up a rig to wire the electricity from a lightning strike into the time machine so that Marty can leap back into the future from 1955 to 1985, the hands on the clock tower are set at 9 and 11. Marty then tries to warn Doc about the future where he will be shot by Muslim terrorists at the mall for stealing plutonium. Get that last part? Something sounds awfully familiar and fishy about this plot. In Back to the Future I and II, there are also similar signs and symbols throughout that act as a form of “psychic programming” about the assassination of John F. Kennedy. As an example, there is the town square that is an exact replica of the layout of Dealy Plaza in Dallas where in a storefront window has a severed head of JFK. This is also the same block where the Delorean time machine is struck by lightning, which is symbolic of the assassination itself in the motorcade. Finally, just to drive the point home, the movie Back to the Future II was released on November 22nd. Ring a bell, anyone?

Hollywood movies are notorious for “predictive programming” that I believe act like subconscious triggering mechanisms that both condition the public for what is to come and signal to those “in the know” what could be described as a kind of sick inside joke for the cabal orchestrating these false-flags and psy-ops. It’s their way of absolving themselves through a kind of occult admission and public submission through hiding their handiwork in plain sight, as it were. Or, as Stanley Kubrick would have it, you watch these films with Eyes Wide Shut whereas they can read the subtext, programming, symbolism, numerology, and sorcery behind the overt plot of the movie. Granted, not all movies are embedded with such layers of meaning and predictive programming, but those that are would certainly be popular enough to do their job on the public psyche at large, which by now is global. Unfortunately, for the vast majority of Americans, this would be considered virtual lunacy to bring up in mixed conversation and naturally most all movie critics are completely oblivious to this topic. That is because we are “symbolic illiterate”, whereas secret societies like the Scottish Rite of Freemasons (especially in the higher degrees) are symbol literate.

Albert Pike

All symbols be they corporate logos, political emblems, or religious iconography has layers of meaning that can be traced through time immemorial and throughout various historical cultures, each one of which may have imbued it with their own particular nexus of meaning and purpose. And, as Carl G. Jung spoke about, there are those ancient and archaic symbols that stir in us what some have referred to as genetic memory to the point where they might as well be etched onto our very DNA. This is what he called “archetypes of the collective unconscious”. Naturally, it would behoove us greatly to know from whence these symbols first arose and what their deeper occult meaning is as understood by the mystery schools throughout the ages, but we are woefully uneducated about these matters and can therefore be triggered (and consequently manipulated) with certain symbols that are used by adepts within the media. This need not be the case, however, and I would urge you to take a crash course in “Symbolic Literacy” by either picking up a few books on the subject, checking out the work of modern symbolist and mythologist Michael Tsarion, and/or reading some of the excellent articles on the subject at http://www.vigilantcitizen.com/


Martyred in the Name of Truth (A Short List of Para-Political Murders) Part 1

John Lennon We Live in a World

In annals of para-politics, there have been many researchers, journalists, politicians, hackers, and various whistle-blowers of governmental/corporate malfeasance and corruption that have been “suicided” (to use a CIA term). This means that, in the process of uncovering massive corruption, cover ups, or otherwise earth-shaking information, they were murdered by the powers that be (often in a black-ops style hit), and the death was summarily ruled a suicide by the subsequent investigation, which is usually the final cover up of whatever explosive information the victim was planning on revealing.

One could make a very convincing argument that for agencies like the CIA assassination has been perfected through decades of practice so extensively…that making a murder look like a suicide or at the least controlling the investigation into it has become standard operating procedure. After all, there are quite a lot of ways to kill somebody these days and make it look like an accident or suicide. You can be thrown from a high rise building the way biological scientist Frank Olsen or Secretary of the Navy James Forrestal were. You can be given cancer or a heart attack via an injection or poisonous dart the way that Oswald’s killer, Jack Ruby, or even probably musical revolutionary, Bob Marley, were quite likely killed.

Of course, the easiest way to kill someone and make it look like a suicide is simply with a gunshot to the head. The problem is when there’s more than one fatal shot or when the gun that’s claimed to be the one used during the suicide doesn’t even have any fingerprints from the victim on it and/or the ballistics don’t match as in the notoriously suspicious Vince Foster case. And, therein lies the rub (if you’ll pardon the rather mafia-like pun). For the people below, these mysterious coincidences pile up one on top of another, quite often to the point that it becomes damn near impossible to deny that they weren’t murdered for what they were about to reveal. After all, what they had already revealed was pretty juicy to the erstwhile conspiracy researcher and intolerable to the power elite.

Taken individually, they mean next to nothing…just another person dead in the obituary column of life’s long procession line to the grave. However, looked at not only in context but also the frequency at which these strange deaths invariably occur, these murders that are ruled a suicide or an accident become something that suggests something far more sinister than one lone death ever could. They serve to remind us that the corrupt architects of power are afraid of being challenged, pursued, and exposed for what they are. Their real power is in manipulating and hypnotizing the public into believing that they are powerless to challenge their authority, which resides solely in the illusionary perception of the masses. And, when their power is unmasked, challenged, or otherwise usurped by an intrepid individual that attempts to wrest power away from the evil and greedy few in order to distribute it more equitably among the masses, this brotherhood of darkness, in all its many guises, isn’t against using bribery, treachery, threats of violence, and even murder itself to achieve their ends as you’ll soon see.

But, when enough people stand up to this monster (especially the monster of fear that resides in all of us) and confronts these people head on, they will inevitably be vanquished, since we far outnumber them and most of their power exists in the fear-based victim mentality our own minds besides. We still must not forget that these people have no moral inhibitions against killing as many people as it takes to preserve their rank and power. So, while compassion and conscience are what distinguish “us” from “them” quite often, we naturally shouldn’t fool ourselves into thinking these people are wholly like ourselves, insofar as they often lack those attributes that make them feel empathy for their fellow human beings.

Nothing should be construed here as prima facie evidence, as even here there are probable murders that don’t warrant a conspiracy to explain them (as in the case of Eugene Mallove). And, neither can it always be said that every victim is a hero, insofar as they aren’t always savory characters themselves (as the case of Roberto Calvi clearly shows). However, by and large, the following list of people are worthy of our admiration, respect, and love as those, who paid the ultimate sacrifice with their lives so that “we the people” might live more conscious, rewarding, and healthy lives as a result of their courageous endeavors. What follows represents a tiny list of some of the more well-known mysterious deaths of truth-seekers, who met with an untimely end at the hands of various agencies usually in order silence their potent message of truth. May their memory serve to remind us of this as we ponder their legacy. And, in no particular order, they are:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Under Siege with the Bundy’s and the BLM: Shades of Waco, Ruby Ridge, and the Fight Against Federal Fascism of the 1990s

That Which is Tyranny by Jefferson

The latest standoff between federal agents of the Bureau of Land and Management (BLM) and Nevada cattle rancher, Cliven Bundy, is coming to a head around the same time that another standoff ended in catastrophe and bloodshed some 21 years ago on April 19th. I’m speaking of course of the splinter group of Seventh Day Adventists, known as the Branch Davidians, whose compound was raided by the ATF and FBI back in 1993 in what would end in fiery tragedy for some 76 members of the church including 23 children. Thanks to the tireless work of many investigators into the Waco tragedy…we now know that the CS gas that was shot into the compound by the Bradley tanks was highly flammable, and this (of and to itself) could have started the massive fire once it was exposed to any kerosine lamps, pilot lights, or candles inside the building.

However, there is also evidence that the FBI actually started the fire by using flash grenades in multiple parts of the compound. While this may appear to be somewhat controversial, based on what we know about the provable corruption, coverups, and criminal acts of the FBI…this should come as no surprise as I’ll clearly show. So, for instance, as the Waco compound was burning to the ground, Branch Davidians were being shot at from the back of the building by what were later determined to be Special Forces snipers, including members of the elite Delta Force. How do we know this? We know that there were shots being fired at the back of the compound as it was going up in flames because of the analysis of the FLEER video, which shows heat signatures of what can only be rifle muzzle flashes.

Waco Compound Burns

Also, it is worth noting that a subsequent investigation by the Texas Rangers on the scene showed bullet holes entering a double door in the back, but this door was seized and promptly “lost” by the FBI. Again, this is not a “conspiracy theory” but is historical fact. One of the lead investigators of the Texas Rangers at Waco was Joaquin Jackson, who later retired in disgust over the whole sordid affair. However, don’t expect the media to tell you what really transpired at Waco. There are tantalizing clues, however, if you know how and where to look.

One such clue that I came across recently was Dick Morris, who told Sean Hannity of FOX that Janet Reno blackmailed Bill Clinton to giving her a 2nd term as Attorney General or else she would “tell the truth  about Waco”. What did she know about Waco besides the fact that she and the FBI had a lot of innocent blood on their hands? The only thing that makes any sense is that Bill (and possibly Hillary) Clinton also knew and probably even ordered the compound be torched on the 51st day of the siege. Unfortunately, Morris doesn’t clarify just what Reno knew, and we’re left with a juicy clue and nothing more.

ATF Goon Squad

It’s instructive that we begin with the Clinton presidency, though, since that’s when we saw a great rise in governmental over-reach of federal power against individual citizens, who were targeted merely for being 2nd Amendment advocates, outspoken about federal centralization of power, or just plain “different” enough to draw the attention and ire of the Feds. This took on an almost maniacal and feverish pitch when the Oklahoma City bombing occurred in 1995 and was quickly blamed on so-called disenfranchised anti-governmental militia types as Timothy McVeigh was claimed to have been.

However, anyone that has studied the Oklahoma City bombing with any real depth can see that the building’s debris was blown out from the inside rather than from the outside inward with a Rider truck filled with a 1,200 lb. fertilizer bomb. There are several affidavits that attest to there being at least two other bombs “inside” the the building that day, including one by Tiffany Bible who swore that she spoke with an ATF agent that told her the Murrah building was destroyed because of retaliation for the Waco debacle. Many of the records of the Waco investigation were being housed in the Murrah building when the lead investigator moved them to Oklahoma City. However, none of the ATF personnel were in the building at the time, which strikes me as very oddly convenient. Meanwhile, the initial reports coming out of the local media describe two unexploded bombs being taken out from inside the building. So, there’s a lot more to the story than what we’ve been told, and I encourage you all to go watch the excellent documentary film “A Noble Lie” should you want to learn just what that other stuff is.

Suffice to say, McVeigh (who asked directions on how to get to the building beforehand) was clearly nothing more than a FBI/ATF stooge patsy that took the fall in order to demonize the “patriot movement” and other champions of the constitution as well as states’ rights over federal power. So, he was blamed for the thing, and Bill Clinton was able to pass the “Anti-Terrorist Act” in 1996.

Another gut-wrenching story of one man’s courageous fight against encroachments from the federal goon squad agents of the ATF and FBI occurred in the Ruby Ridge case of the Randy Weaver family of Idaho. Here again, federal agents were using an informant to entrap Randy in an “illegal weapons” charge and attempting to drag him into court over a sawed-off shotgun. They staked out his property, harassed his children (just as the BLM has with the Bundy’s), and even shot the family dog. Unfortunately, after they shot the dog, Randy’s 14-year-old son Sammy was killed, when he exchanged fire with the federal agent that killed his beloved pet.

Randy Weaver

Idaho ( much like Montana) was known to have stalwart ranchers and farmers, who distrusted their corrupt government and clearly had a “Don’t Tread on Me” attitude. That’s why the Weaver family had their community’s support from the beginning of their ordeal to the horribly tragic conclusion, when Randy Weaver’s wife was shot between the eyes by an FBI sniper as she held her infant in the doorway of their house. Even the corrupt FBI agent had to admit his heinous crime in this case and settle with Randy for $3.1 million in a subsequent lawsuit that he filed against them for the wrongful death of his wife.

However, I don’t care how much you’re able to get in a lawsuit after the fact…nothing, absolutely nothing can ever make up for losing your wife and one of your children! These are the kinds of crimes of the state that were infuriating a small but growing handful of mostly rural people in the US during the 1990s, who were dismissed by the mainstream media as crazy “conspiracy theorist”  domestic terrorists.

At one point, the infamous inventor of the “magic bullet theory” Warren Commission member, Arlen Specter, chaired a congressional hearing about the rise of militia groups in America that had grown in response to tragedies like Waco and Ruby Ridge. You can tell that he’s clearly incredulous to the outcry and claims being made by the various militia men, concerned patriots, and constitutional attorneys on the video. However, since he was a part of the coverup of the JFK assassination, this should come as no surprise. One surmises that he (along with the US congress, White House, and various alphabet soup agencies) were looking at these courageous men as “threats” to the attempt being made to slowly turn this country into a slavish, technocratic, corporate-socialist police state, which is exactly what happened and accelerated into hyper-drive post 9/11.

Under Siege

One must realize that with the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1989 and the fall of the Berlin Wall…the Military-Industrial-Complex had to find a “new enemy” to keep the money flowing into their coffers, and this meant that, even if a huge existential threat and enemy was imaginary, the important thing for the US hegemonic war machine was to have something to be able to justify their enormous Pentagon and National Security State budgets. That’s why “terrorism” was chosen as the new “existential” enemy that can and would not ever be eliminated. After all, terrorism is a strategy of fighting (largely poorly armed people against standing armies) and therefore it’s not even a legitimate external enemy as such. Also, when big powerful countries like the US invade a smaller country like Iraq (as it did in 2003) under false pretenses, there is quite naturally going to be a violent backlash from the occupied people of that country attempting to throw off the yoke of foreign domination and control. So, all the US does is create legions of terrorists around the world every time it or its Israeli client state drops a bomb or fires a missile into the dwellings of “suspected” terrorists, who just as often as not end up being innocent men, women, and children that we derisively label “collateral damage”.

Now, let’s get back to Cliven Bundy and his fight against the BLM. While it’s fairly obvious that he was pushing his luck in not paying the grazing fees for his cattle since 1993, he contends that it is “public land”, and he has more of a right to it than any federal agency. Of course, the idea of public land belonging to the public is just that…an idea and largely a false one at that. The state of Nevada, in particular, is almost all government-owned land. And, even if you think you own a piece of property, tell me this- “Why (assuming that you own it) would you need to pay property taxes on it year in and year out?” What happens when you refuse to support the psychiatric public school system and decide that you’re not going to pay? Obviously, you’re going to lose what was never really yours to begin with.

However, let’s concede that Mr. Bundy does in fact have the right to the land, since he’s the one that lives there and raises his cattle on that land. This hearkens back to the days of the great migration westward when pioneers were allowed to lay claim to a piece of real estate so long as they built a home there, tilled the soil, or raised animals on the land. And, in that respect, yes Cliven Bundy certainly does have (under those settler’s conditions) more of a right to the land than a third party governmental agency, whose dubious role in the desert Southwest has been far less than stellar. The BLM, to my mind, are nothing more than a bureaucratically meddlesome bunch of control freaks, who showed their true colors in the wild horses scandal that has been ongoing now.

One certainly has to wonder whether or not the reasons for the harassment under the approval of Clark County’s sheriff and Sen. Harry Reid is really nothing more than a land grab situation, where the Bundy ranch just so happens to sit on what some oil and gas company want to frack or a mining company wants to dig. After all, one of the largest gold mining companies in the world, Barrick, have several major operations in Nevada. And, according to investigative journalist, Greg Palast, they were able to practically steal the rights to the largest known deposits of gold in this country for a mere $10,000 and turn it into $10,000,000,000 in pure profit. That’s $10 billion dollars that went to a Canadian company and was given a big assist by George H.W. Bush Sr., who just so happened to be given a multi-million dollar consulting job after he left the White House. That’s big money, people, and I can guarantee that if the Bundy’s are sitting on what some might think is even a fraction of this kind of wealth…I wouldn’t doubt it when Harry Reid says- “It’s not over.” Interestingly enough, one of Senator Reid’s largest campaign contributors over the years has been a mining company called Newmont that are involved in a joint venture with Barrick in Nevada.

 

Nevada Rancher And Federal Gov't Face Off Over Land Use Battle

 

 


The 9/11 Attack: 12 Years Later, What Have We Learned?

English: United Airlines Flight 175 crashes in...

English: United Airlines Flight 175 crashes into the south tower of the World Trade Center complex in New York City during the September 11 attacks (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

It’s been a dozen years since the September 11th, 2001 attack of the World Trade Center complex and the Pentagon, and I think that it is therefore a good time re-visit that chaotic Tuesday in order to ask- “What (if anything) have we learned about 9/11?” Despite continual lies, cover-ups, misinformation, denials, and propaganda coming from governmental sources and parroted by the mainstream media from the beginning, we can now prove beyond a shadow of doubt using much of their own news reports (as this middle section of “Zeitgeist” shows) that the “official story” about 9/11 that the government would have us believe is complete and utter rubbish.

Unfortunately, it is this same bullshit myth that was used as the pretext to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, which had absolutely nothing to do with Al-Qaeda or 9/11. State-sponsored false-flags and media-approved myths die hard, however, and 9/11 is still the preferred means by which the US is able to wage its bogus “War on Terror”, an Orwellian term of newspeak if there ever was one, and perpetuate its ongoing assault against civil liberties at home via atrocious pieces of legislation such as the Patriot Act, the Military Commissions Act, and the Obama-signed National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that made it legal to target and assassinate American citizens by executive fiat!

With the US fast turning into a totalitarian police state, one would assume that the foundations upon which this fascist, technocratic, surveillance culture of fear is based would be on solid footing. However, as anyone can plainly and reasonably see with the barest of investigatory acumen, nothing could be further from the truth. While I don’t have the space or time to go into all the details as it would indeed require a book or more to do so, let’s look a tiny fraction of the lies that we’ve been told about 9/11 and some of the alternative information out there in the open record that proves this assertion.

First, we were told that 19 (mostly Saudi) hijackers, armed with box cutters, were able to commandeer four passenger planes on the morning of 9/11, outsmarting the combined defense systems of 16 different US agencies, including NORAD, the FAA, and the Air Force that waited until it was too late before they finally scrambled jets to intercept. As a result, planes flew into the South and North Tower of the WTC, with another hitting the Pentagon, and the final Flight 93 crashing near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Then, we were told that WTC 1 and 2 collapsed due to internal fires caused by Flight 11 and 175 that hit the two towers and subsequently collapsed it in a pancake-like fashion at near free-fall speed, where the buildings were turned into a pile of dust. We’re then supposed to believe that WTC 7 (that was never even hit by an airliner) somehow collapsed into its own footprint due to a few localized internal fires!

Already, we are faced with a structural impossibility, as has been voluminously documented by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. However, the National Institute of Safety and Technology (NIST) that was the basis of the 9/11 Commission Report continues to claim, on nothing more than an idiotic computer modelling program, that three reinforced concrete steel-structured buildings were brought down by a couple of planes (the damage of which was confined to a few floors) and jet fuel (the majority of which never burned hotter than about 1300 degrees Fahrenheit) somehow collapsed 48 steel columns at near free fall speed. Never before in the history of skyscrapers has a building come down as result of fires weakening the steel girders, and yet we are told to believe that just such a scenario occurred on September 11th three separate times, including WTC 7 that was never even hit by plane at all.

Also, what should have been the biggest crime scene in US history, with the requisite investigation of the debris studied to determine how these collapses could have occurred the way that they did, was quickly covered up when Controlled Demolition was called in to haul it all off, where what little remained of the dustified remains could be shipped to China and India to be melted down and destroyed. WTF?! Months after 9/11, clean-up crews clearing away the debris at Ground Zero were coming across molten metal that resembled a foundry, according to some reports. This kind of heat signature points to massive amounts of nano-thermite, which was actually found in three separate samples taken from the debris field and tested under rigorous scientific protocols. The report of these astounding findings were subsequently printed in a peer-reviewed physics and chemical journal and can be read in its entirety here.

The owner of the WTC Complex, a Mr. Larry Silverstein, had conveniently just taken out a multi-million dollar insurance policy on the WTC Towers. He is also on the record as saying, in reference to WTC 7, that “Maybe, the best decision was to pull it.” This is slang used in the controlled demolition field for “let’s bring the building down.” He naturally denied that that was what he meant, saying that he was referring to “pulling the first-responders out of the building.” However, even if we take Silverstein at his word, we now know that even the BBC had advanced knowledge of the collapse, since they were seen reporting on its collapse before it actually came down at 5:20pm.

In addition to all the evidence for a “controlled demolition”, there is no real evidence that a plane hit the Pentagon at all, since in all the photographs taken there isn’t one that depicts plane wreckage, not even the engine. Instead, we are expected to believe that Flight 77 was flown by Hani Hanjour (who flight instructors said couldn’t even fly a Cessna safely enough to fly solo ) somehow managed to dive a 757 into a 270 degree bank before striking the Pentagon. Interesting enough, this just so happened to be the same side of the Pentagon that was undergoing renovations and housed a Office of Naval Intelligence operation that was busy investigating the some 2.3 trillion dollars in missing money from the Department of Defense!

Speaking of money, there was certainly quite a lot to be made that day given how many “put options” were placed on United and American Airlines. A “put option” is a bet that the stock is going to go down, and there were an abnormally large amount of these bets being placed by those “in the know”, although the SEC has never released the names of those individuals. There are quite a few questions surrounding 9/11 that have yet to be satisfactorily answered. And, there are probably quite a few that haven’t even been asked, at least not by the people who should be asking them.

There are some very revealing timelines leading up to 9/11 that clearly show how rogue elements within the CIA, Pentagon, and Neo-Con Bush Administration not only knew of an impending attack but “made it happen”. To date, we have yet to have an truly independent “official” investigation into the events of 9/11, and it seems likely that we probably never will. However, much of the truth (including those that were intimately involved in orchestrating it and covering the whole thing up) is now available to the public thanks to the tireless efforts of researchers, authors, and filmmakers that are the real heroes in informing the public, where most of the media has failed.

 

9-11 Was an Inside Job


“Usama Bin Laden Death Files”- The Coverup Continues with Help from the Navy and the CIA

English: Osama bin Laden interviewed for Daily...

English: Osama bin Laden interviewed for Daily Pakistan in 1997; behind him on the wall is an AK-47 carbine. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Recently, important evidence was made completely inaccessible to the public and the media in the continued coverup of the “so-called raid that killed Usama bin Laden” back in May 2011. According to Global Research, the Vice Admiral of the Navy, William McRaven, was primarily responsible for moving all of the “death files” data from the Pentagon to the CIA, which makes it exempt from disclosure to the AP, Reuters, UPI, or any personal FOIA request for that matter.

So, despite president Barrack Obama’s promise of making his administration more “transparent”, this is yet another example of how his administration is actually one of the most secretive in history. Clearly, the “official” narrative of the killing of bin Laden is falling apart at the seams, beginning with their claim that they wouldn’t release the pictures of bin Laden’s dead body because it might incite further violence or be used as a propaganda tool. We were assured that it was him by a president that could use a good jump start to his bid for re-election with a propaganda device of his own making. And, in order to coverup the entire hoax as to who it was they really killed, the body was dumped at sea.

Prior to the raid by SEAL Team 6, there were already prominent officials and media sources, who went on the record as saying that bin Laden was already dead as long ago as December 2001. Even Benazir Bhutto, in a censored interview she gave with the BBC before she was assassinated in 2007, claimed that Usama bin Laden was killed by Omar Sheik, who was a CIA asset. Others claim that he died from complications from kidney failure or typhoid, since it was widely known that he was on dialysis and very ill. However he may have died, one thing is abundantly clear…the photographs that were published the mainstream media claiming to be pictures of a dead bin Laden were obvious fakes.

Furthermore, most of the residents in the city of Abbottabad, Pakistan weren’t buying the “official story” of events either, especially when one considers that Abbottabad is the home of a major military army base and training center and yet supposedly didn’t know about bin Laden living there. The video the Pentagon released without sound, that the US claimed was bin Laden watching himself on TV, was an obvious forgery (just like all the other forgeries) and the people of Pakistan certainly weren’t believing any of the propaganda pieces being spun in their media.

Another fake photo-op was the famous picture of president Obama and members of his cabinet supposedly watching the raid on “closed circuit” TV in the White House “Situation Room”. The problem with this scenario is that Jim Lehrer of PBS News interviewed CIA Director, Leon Panetta, and was told that there was a blackout of the “live video” taken by SEAL Team 6 of the raid inside the fortified compound.

There are also indications that part of the ongoing coverup might very well include killing members of SEAL Team 6, who went on the May 1st raid, to keep them from talking about what really happened. SEALs such as Brett Shadle and Job W. Price have already died in what were reported to be a parachute accident and a suicide, respectively. However, given what they might have said about the bin Laden operation, I now have my doubts, and I’m apparently not the only one. While families of SEAL Team 6 are pissed off at Obama for leaking what spec-op group was even involved in the raid, the government won’t tell us the names of those men, who were actually involved personally.

However, I wouldn’t be surprised if quite a few of those members that were involved in the raid and many others in a great position to know some of the finer details were killed over eastern Afghanistan back in August 2011, when their NATO Chinook helicopter was hit by a RPG (Rocket Propelled Grenade). Of the 38 men and one dog aboard the helicopter, at least 22 were confirmed to have been members of SEAL Team 6 according to the New York Times. Most Americans, unfortunately, will likely remain willfully ignorant by swallowing the whole stinking lie of CIA propaganda videos, television shows, and Hollywood movies that support the official myth like Zero Dark Thirty, making a mockery of the truth. The old adage certainly holds firm in this case that- “Truth is the first casualty of war.”

Pete Souza, Official White House Photographer

Pete Souza, Official White House Photographer (Photo credit: Wikipedia)