“The United States has it’s own propaganda, but it’s very effective because people don’t realize that it’s propaganda. And it’s subtle, but it’s actually a much stronger propaganda machine than the Nazis had but it’s funded in a different way. With the Nazis it was funded by the government, but in the United States, it’s funded by corporations and corporations they only want things to happen that will make people want to buy stuff. So whatever that is, then that is considered okay and good, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it really serves people’s thinking – it can stupefy and make not very good things happen.” – Crispin Hellion Glover
Recently, I had the distinct opportunity to see “Crispin Glover Live”, where he gave a series of slide show presentations that left me in a state of what I would describe as bemused confusion at what exactly I was witnessing. After all, how does one begin to fully explain what a reading and rendering of a book about the intricacies of rat catching and cadavers from a professional in the field of dissection and listing of anatomical features interspersed with what appear to be a series of drawings, book passages, and black-and-white photographs from the 1950s really mean? Next, he showed his surreal movie “What is It?”, a Jungian-like exploration of the unconscious adventures of a motley cast of characters, mostly with Down Syndrome, that involved a white guy in black face, a running motif of a dissolving snail being salted, and Crispin Glover himself playing some kind of cruel king of the underworld surrounded by a bevy of topless women with animal heads and one grown man in a diaper lying a crib. Honestly, you can’t make this crazy shit up! But, Crispin Glover can and did make this up…creating what I’m sure was one of the greatest WTF moments in many warped peoples’ minds that were lucky enough to be there that night with me at the Alamo Drafthouse.
Most of you, however, probably remember Crispin Glover not from his personal surreal film oddities like the aforementioned “What is It?” but rather his acting in idiosyncratic roles like Dale in David Lynch’s Wild at Heart. It was his breakthrough role as the nerdy and socially-awkward George McFly, who is able to rise to the occasion against his arch nemesis Biff with the help of his future son played by Michael J. Fox, where Crispin Glover became a recognizable actor in Hollywood. Unfortunately, one gets the impression that Hollywood never really fully appreciated his decidedly bizarre choice of characters that were to follow and nor especially the anti-corporate ethos regarding his own creative work. Even on the celebrity talk show circuit, Glover was quickly typecast as a dangerous weirdo, as his appearance on Letterman would clearly show when he was kicked off the show for well…”kicking on the show”.
However, behind the largely unpretentious, darkly humorous, and quirky character turns of Glover lay a much overlooked critical and very perceptive mind that saw the Hollywood system for what it really represented to those unfamiliar with its inner workings. This came out during an enlightening session of Q&A at the end of the movie where Glover talked about the creative straight jacket of Hollywood and how experimental movies such as his own are essentially locked out of any commercial distribution through the main theater chain outlets. This obviously isn’t that surprising given that the commercial theater chains only real objective is to maximize profit on a per screen basis and will quickly cut anything that isn’t pulling in the numbers they want, which is why you rarely see any documentaries playing on the silver screen except in a handful of small theaters that also play indie and foreign films. It was during this Q&A that Crispin Glover spoke about what became something of a defining moment for him. He was working on the set of Back to the Future that would soon make him into a household name with director Robert Zemeckis. Originally, after Marty McFly returned to his new and improved family that now lived in a wealthy neighborhood where the kids all had great professions as opposed to low-paying jobs, the McFly family had a black servant. Glover politely mentioned to the director how this might appear racist to black audiences, and Zemeckis wisely changed the servant to a newly humbled Biff putting a second coat of wax on George McFly’s fancy car. However, the underlying assumption of the movie remained unchanged in Glover’s mind as he relates in this interview on the Opie and Anthony Show where he speaks about the controversy surrounding his feud with Robert Zemeckis.
So, just what is the subtext of Back to the Future’s ending? “A self-realized and happy existence equals a rich and materialistic life.” Is this the message? Or, am I oversimplifying the underlying message of Back to the Future? Could the onetime yuppie star of the greed obsessed 1980s, Michael J. Fox, who started out as a teenage Reagan wet dream in the sitcom “Family Ties” and graduated to movies that celebrated the ego-centric corporate ladder climbing purpose of life in movies such as The Secret of My Success really be about nothing more profound than the joys of materialism? When Crispin Glover probed the question further, Robert Zemeckis told him point blank- “Listen, I don’t care about artistry. I want to be rich!!” There you have it. And, no doubt with such blockbusters as Forest Gump under his belt, Robert Zemeckis would indeed become rich beyond his wildest dreams as he knew all too well how to cater to audiences’ expectations in terms of what makes for mass entertaining movie. This blockbuster formula would be followed to a “T” even better by Hollywood’s Golden Boy director of the last 40 years, Steven Spielberg, beginning with Jaws released back in 1975.
It is a formula that has been followed perhaps a bit too well over the years, and Glover reserves some particularly pointed barbs for Spielberg that you can see in a classic chapter that he wrote in the brilliantly subversive book, Apocalypse Culture II. Interestingly, the book was edited and published by Adam Parfrey of Feral House, who also just so happens to play the Minstrel character in Glover’s “What is It?” movie mentioned previously. I specifically asked Crispin Glover about the comments he made in Apocalypse Culture II and Spielberg (in particular) for those in attendance that were unfamiliar with the book, and he reiterated again how he didn’t like Steven Spielberg movies at all and thought that they were totally subservient to the corporate ethos. In fact, he said that the only movie he somewhat liked of Spielberg’s entire oeuvre was A.I. that was released as something of a homage to Stanley Kubrick after he died and never got the chance to do the film. Kubrick told Spielberg that he thought he should do the movie instead given his worries that he might make the movie too cerebral, whereas we all know we needn’t worry about Spielberg making something too intellectually probing. However, while I would agree with Glover that A.I. had some rather interesting philosophical themes, I too wish that Kubrick had been the one to make the movie, since I’m sure he would have made a much more profound and interesting film.
At one point in Apocalypse Culture II, Glover chastises Spielberg for completely missing the point of Kubrick’s philosophy as when Spielberg calls Kubrick’s movies “hopeful”. He then rhetorically asks, “Was A Clockwork Orange hopeful? Was Full Metal Jacket hopeful?” Clearly, one begins to wonder just how Spielberg was seeing these movies if indeed he was seeing them at all. Kubrick was often criticized for portraying humanity as too dark, too unethical, and too morally ambiguous…but hopeful? Hardly a word I would use to describe his work. This isn’t to say that there weren’t little moments in his pictures like his future wife, Christiane, singing a German folk song to a group of hardened WWI French soldiers in Paths of Glory that didn’t tap into a kind of universal sentimental zeitgeist, but (unlike Spielberg) he was not a “sentimental” director in the sense of mawkishly milking emotionalism within his movies to garner greater appreciation and recognition. In other words, he saw deeply into much of the dark abyss that lies within men’s souls and wasn’t afraid to portray it on screen without apology and without the usual formulaic redemption scene that accompanies most Hollywood movies that touch on the darker aspects of humanity these days. That shows real courage, in my opinion, instead of merely skillfully manipulating an audience’s emotions to love the hero, hate the villain, and be roused from their seats with a John Williams score and “happily ever after ending”. Even the late, great director Sidney Lumet once quipped that he couldn’t stand American audiences because- “They are totally sentimental.” I would wholeheartedly agree with at least this sentiment and add (due to this) also highly predictable in their tastes.
What is even more interesting, however, about a movie like Back to the Future is that it has scenes of predictive programming woven into the plot that (if you watch carefully) actually predict what will occur on September 11th, 2001. How does a movie that came out in 1985 predict perhaps the single most important geopolitical event of the last 40 years some 31 years in the future? It would certainly seem highly unlikely that scenes in the Back to the Future franchise foreshadowing 9/11 were mere coincidence. So, for instance, the mall where Marty and Doc meet to test the Delorean time machine took place at Twin Pines mall, a reference to the Twin Towers. Also, if you turn the clock upside down, it reads 9:11. Later in the movie, the Twin Pines are replaced with a Lone Pine. Why? Also, when Doc sets up a rig to wire the electricity from a lightning strike into the time machine so that Marty can leap back into the future from 1955 to 1985, the hands on the clock tower are set at 9 and 11. Marty then tries to warn Doc about the future where he will be shot by Muslim terrorists at the mall for stealing plutonium. Get that last part? Something sounds awfully familiar and fishy about this plot. In Back to the Future I and II, there are also similar signs and symbols throughout that act as a form of “psychic programming” about the assassination of John F. Kennedy. As an example, there is the town square that is an exact replica of the layout of Dealy Plaza in Dallas where in a storefront window has a severed head of JFK. This is also the same block where the Delorean time machine is struck by lightning, which is symbolic of the assassination itself in the motorcade. Finally, just to drive the point home, the movie Back to the Future II was released on November 22nd. Ring a bell, anyone?
Hollywood movies are notorious for “predictive programming” that I believe act like subconscious triggering mechanisms that both condition the public for what is to come and signal to those “in the know” what could be described as a kind of sick inside joke for the cabal orchestrating these false-flags and psy-ops. It’s their way of absolving themselves through a kind of occult admission and public submission through hiding their handiwork in plain sight, as it were. Or, as Stanley Kubrick would have it, you watch these films with Eyes Wide Shut whereas they can read the subtext, programming, symbolism, numerology, and sorcery behind the overt plot of the movie. Granted, not all movies are embedded with such layers of meaning and predictive programming, but those that are would certainly be popular enough to do their job on the public psyche at large, which by now is global. Unfortunately, for the vast majority of Americans, this would be considered virtual lunacy to bring up in mixed conversation and naturally most all movie critics are completely oblivious to this topic. That is because we are “symbolic illiterate”, whereas secret societies like the Scottish Rite of Freemasons (especially in the higher degrees) are symbol literate.
All symbols be they corporate logos, political emblems, or religious iconography has layers of meaning that can be traced through time immemorial and throughout various historical cultures, each one of which may have imbued it with their own particular nexus of meaning and purpose. And, as Carl G. Jung spoke about, there are those ancient and archaic symbols that stir in us what some have referred to as genetic memory to the point where they might as well be etched onto our very DNA. This is what he called “archetypes of the collective unconscious”. Naturally, it would behoove us greatly to know from whence these symbols first arose and what their deeper occult meaning is as understood by the mystery schools throughout the ages, but we are woefully uneducated about these matters and can therefore be triggered (and consequently manipulated) with certain symbols that are used by adepts within the media. This need not be the case, however, and I would urge you to take a crash course in “Symbolic Literacy” by either picking up a few books on the subject, checking out the work of modern symbolist and mythologist Michael Tsarion, and/or reading some of the excellent articles on the subject at http://www.vigilantcitizen.com/
Para-Political Journal 
Solving the 911 Mystery (Part 1): The Israeli Connection
“The deathly precision of the attacks and the magnitude of planning would have required years of planning. Such a sophisticated operation would require the fixed frame of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a loose group like the one led by the student Mohammed Atta in Hamburg.” -Eckehardt Werthebach (Former President of Germany’s Verfassungsschutz Intelligence Service)
As you’re no doubt well aware, this year marks the 15th Anniversary of the 911 Attacks, which claimed the lives of close to 3,000 people. During the past 15 years, America has not only been irrevocably been transformed into complete corporate fascist police state put into perpetual high alert and fear of a nebulous enemy that are almost always Arab and/or Muslim, but our country has also embarked upon the dangerous and bloody business of fighting wars abroad in the name of the oxymoron slogan “War on Terror”, wherein the US claims to be preemptively targeting “state-sponsors of terrorism”. However, what if some the biggest state-sponsors of terrorism were actually considered our closest political allies? And, what if there were credible evidence that some of the real architects of the 911 Attacks weren’t Afghani, Pakistani, or even Saudi but actually Israeli? Would you really want to know? While this evidence is considered controversial, even among many within the 911 Truth movement, I believe that it is some of the most compelling and substantial evidence there is in determining just who the guilty culprits involved in the 911 actually are. Unfortunately, you will never see a true unbiased investigation into the events of September 11th, 2001 by either the US government or the mainstream media in this country. Therefore, it is up to the alternative media like Para-Political Journal to take it up.
For a much fuller and detailed account of the Israeli Connection to 911, I highly suggest you read Christopher Bollyn’s book Solving 911: The Deception That Changed The World. I picked up a copy from Bollyn himself, who gave an excellent talk at the recent “911 Truth Fest” in Austin, TX on the 15th Year Anniversary. You can watch the entirety of the Fest on-line that is now archived on Livestream by the host, Ron Avery, or simply start it around the 1 hr. 13 min. mark to see Christopher Bollyn’s stellar presentation. Needless to say, he’s an extremely courageous man to be writing and speaking about this little known and under investigated aspect of 911, even though it goes straight to the heart of some of the culprits in what is clearly a false-flag attack, since to broach this topic in media circles is certain career suicide along with being labeled a “Crazy Conspiracy Theorist” and (even worse in the public domain) an “Anti-Semite”. However, how many people know what the current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu actually said the day after September 11th, 2001? As the New York Times reported:
Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu replied, “It’s very good.” Then, he edited himself: “Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.”
Much later on, in April of 2008, the Israeli newspapers Haaretz and Ma’ariv reported on Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech at Bar Ilan university where he said:
“We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq.”
He went on to say that it was 911 attacks that swung opinion to Israel’s favor. Of course, Benjamin Netanyahu is a hardliner member of the Likud Party, which is the Israeli equivalent of the Neocon, wherein it is vehemently pro-Zionist and very hawkish in matters pertaining to the daily sufferings of the Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza. When you consider how the Apartheid State of Israel wants to topple certain Middle Eastern regimes it considers threats to its security as well as continue its illegal territorial expansions into the Golan Heights, the Sinai, Jordan, Lebanon, and even parts of Syria– it begins to make strategic sense from a Machiavellian point of view, of course, why Israel would seek to manipulate the US into fighting proxy wars on its behalf. After all, if you can use the full power and weight of the most powerful military force on the planet to do the fighting and dying…then you can preserve your own military from undertaking such an arduous task and deflect some of the enmity of your neighbors towards your very useful tool, while getting rid of your enemies all in one fell swoop. Also, let’s not forget that among the Project for the New American Century gang that ushered in the Bush-Cheney Neocons were Zionists like Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Donald Rumsfeld, Robert Kagan, Elliot Abrams, and William Kristol, who could push the Bush Administration into a war against Iraq irregardless of their complete non-involvement with Al-Qaida and the Taliban.
In addition to a clear geo-political motive and the ideological parallels between Bush Cabinet PNAC Neocons and their Likud Zionist counterparts, there is also evidence that Israeli Intelligence (specifically Mossad) has penetrated into the deepest levels of our government, telecommunications industry, security systems, aviation industry, and high-level software and technology infrastructure to the point that it could feasibly pull off an operation as sophisticated as the 911, particularly if we consider the fact that jet fuel alone couldn’t have possibly brought down the Twin Towers. Once you’ve studied the voluminous evidence of Active Thermitic Material found in the dust debris at Ground Zero as Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, David Ray Griffin, BYU Physics Professor Steven Jones and his team of scientists that wrote an in-depth scientific published in a peer-reviewed chemical journal did exhaustively– the natural question that arises is, “Who had the kind of lengthy access to the elevator shafts, various floors inside the building, and control over the security in order to place tons of explosive super thermitic material throughout the WTC Complex for its eventual destruction, including the 47 story building of WTC 7 that was never hit by any plane that day?” Let’s consider this crucial evidence, including that of controlled demolition of the World Trade Center buildings.
First, let’s recall that the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) began investigating a group of Israelis posing as “Art Students” back in January of 2000, who had penetrated a number of major US government facilities. While it is known that Israeli criminal gangs are some of the major traffickers of the drug Ecstasy, these spies also managed to penetrate places like Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma City that houses the AWACS surveillance craft and Stealth Bombers. According to various news reports once the story was leaked to the press by the DEA, some 120 Israeli nationals were apprehended and exported on VISA violations although many are thought to remain at large. The question is- “Who authorized this massive spying operation into sensitive US government facilities?” And, what (if anything) did it have to do with 911, as it was certainly ongoing up through Sept. 11th 2001?
FOX News Correspondent, Carl Cameron, broke this story in the US media with a 4 Part Report that covered not only the “Art Student” spy ring but also Israeli control over a telecommunications system called Amdocs, which was funneling practically every US phone call directly to Israel. He also spoke about the rarely mentioned scandal of a small software company called P-Tech that was raided by the FBI after it was determined to have connections with known terrorist sympathizers. P-Tech software was being run on FAA and NORAD computers and could exploit holes in their systems to in effect cause the kind of mass confusion and chaos we saw that day in communications and the delays in scrambling fighter jets, which hasn’t been officially accounted for. We’ll come back to detail P-Tech later, since it’s a crucial link in the 911 operation. Unfortunately, Carl Cameron’s groundbreaking revelations never were picked up by any other major media outlet, and FOX News even yanked the article from their website shortly after it was posted. When asked about it on C-SPAN, Carl Cameron seemed to think that FOX News was merely making room for greater news coverage of the war, but (having seen censorship operate before on sensitive stories) I’m not buying that explanation as to why it was taken out of the archives. Fortunately, another 911 researcher by the name of Rebekah Roth followed the bread crumbs to some very interesting pictures that revealed one of the most “explosive” revelations as to what some of these Mossad spies posing as “Art Students” were doing on a floor inside the World Trade Center. Check out her video on YouTube where she describes what she discovered, and make up your own mind about what exactly it means in the larger context of 911.
We also now know that Israelis were given an early warning not to come to work that day in Lower Manhattan. This is because someone using Odigo, which is one of the largest “instant messaging” companies and has its headquarters two blocks from the WTC, sent out an early warning message to at least two of its employees that there was going to be an attack in New York some two hours before it actually happened. According to a Vice President for Odigo, the messaging system has a feature that allows it send messages based on particular interests and demographics. In other words, you can specify a message to be sent based on someone’s nationality like say…Israeli.
In addition to the curious early warning to Odigo employees, the Zim-American Israeli Shipping Co. apparently also showed signs that they knew what was coming and vacated their 16th Floor offices in the WTC one week prior to the 911 attacks. The Zim Shipping Co. had announced some 6 months before that they were moving to Norfolk, VA, and there were only 10 employees out of more than 200 left in the building on 911. However, all ten managed to escape alive. The only Israeli company still left in the WTC Towers is called ClearForest that had about 18 employees, and the handful in the building that day all were able to escape in time. Interestingly, the Israeli government actually owns half of the Zim Shipping Co.
There was another shipping/trucking company that was being used as a Mossad front on 911 that is even stranger than Zim. This company is called Urban Moving Systems, and its owner is a man by the name of Dominic Suter. The FBI told ABC News that “Urban Moving Systems may have been providing cover for an Israeli intelligence operation.” The reason for their suspicions about Urban Moving Systems were raised when a woman calls police and the FBI regarding “Five Dancing Israelis”, who were seen filming the burning WTC Towers from the roof of their company’s building. The witness to this bizarre event described them as mocking of the day’s disaster with obvious expressions of happiness and joy. When the police pulled over their “Urban Moving Systems” labeled van, one man is found with $4,700 in his sock and another had two passports on his person. According to the local investigators, they found “maps of the city in the car with certain places highlighted”. As one of the officials described, “It looked like they’re hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen.” You can now even hear the actual police dispatch voice recordings of when they found an Urban Moving Systems van painted with mural depicting a plane flying into the Twin Towers. The FBI later discovers that at least two of them, the brothers Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, are Mossad agents. Although the FBI supposedly interrogates them for weeks, they are released 71 days after their arrest on immigration violations and return to Israel. Three of them (Oded Ellner, Omer Marmari, and Yari Shmuel) even go on Israeli television to talk about the whole ordeal. Are we supposed to believe that this was simply bureaucratic snafu and slip up?
One report speculated that the “Israeli Art Student” spy ring investigated by the DEA was so sloppy and brazen that it was a diversion or decoy to the real Mossad spy ring that could accomplish its goals much more professionally undetected. This makes sense insofar as the art of spy craft goes. However, even with so many “decoys” being caught with box cutters, high-lighted maps, video tapes of sky scrappers, multiple passports, computer hard drives, abnormal amounts of cash, residue from explosive material, etc., why were they were all let go after a brief period of detention? In other words, no matter how guilty they seemed to be or actually were in their espionage, surveillance, and covert operations to bring the WTC Towers down via nano-thermite as Steven Jones, Richard Gage, David Ray Griffin, etc. have shown, they were totally immune to prosecution for their crimes. Clearly, they have friends in very high places to include the FBI, CIA, and White House. In the case of the FBI, for example, the Assistant Attorney General was Michael Chertoff. As Christopher Bollyn says, “Having a dedicated Zionist agent in the key position, as Assistant Attorney General controlling the criminal division of the Department of Justice, gave the Israelis the operational security to carry out this massive crime without fear of exposure or prosecution. It should be noted that Chertoff also played a key role in the prosecution of the 1993 false-flag terror bombing at the World Trade Center.”
Needless to say, what I’ve presented so far in this article is just the tip of a very dirty, complex, and suppressed iceberg of complicity via the Israeli Connection to the crimes of 911. And, even this is just one part of an even larger conspiracy that involves a financial coup, which if you knew the details of would stagger your imagination. However, the important thing to keep in mind when considering the huge scope of the largest single day mass murder in American history is to not fixate on any one anomaly or even several anomalies to the event (interesting though they may be) in isolation but rather to attempt to piece together all those anomalous news stories, buried in the back pages of the US media and more prominently displayed in the foreign media, in order to begin to see the real overall picture and narrative as to what took place that day.
In other words, you have to begin to think “conspiratorially” as well along the lines of-“Who was in control of the architectural, managerial, operational, and working level of the 911 attacks?” And, you have to look at the choke points of the entire operation to know how it can not only override the regular operating procedures and protocol that day such as shipping the scrap iron to particular junk yards where it can be cut up and shipped to Asian recycling plants to be melted down. These are the kinds of questions that have to not only be asked but answered correctly, if you’re ever going to get to the truth along with obvious ones like “Qui Bono?”. Much more to come in Part 2 of this series.
Leave a comment | tags: 15th Year Anniversary of 911 Attacks, 911 False Narrative, Benjamin Netanyahu's Comments About 911, Carl Cameron, Christopher Bollyn, Dancing Israeli Students, DEA Investigation of Israeli Art Students, Israeli Art Student Spy Ring, Israeli Territorial Ambitions, Michael Chertoff as Israeli Agent, Mossad and 911, Mossad Fronts, Odigo, P-Tech and 911, PNAC and Zionism, Solving the 911 Mystery, The Israeli Connection to 911, Thermite in Dust of WTC Towers, Urban Moving Systems, Who Brought the Towers Down?, Who Did 911?, Zim Shipping, Zionist Infiltration of the US | posted in False Flag Operations, The 9/11 File, Uncategorized