The roots of the European migrant crisis, which of course is directly tied to the proxy wars and chaos in the Middle East (particularly in places like Libya and Syria), run through foreign policy objectives implemented by Washington and Tel Aviv. This article will address them both, since that’s the only way you’ll be able to grasp what’s really going on as opposed to the constant media spin and propaganda we’re subjected to on a daily basis. First, let’s look at the US and NATO’s role in the attack on Libya and the underlying reasons for Gaddafi’s killing that naturally led to Libya becoming a completely failed state and breeding ground for terrorists.
Back in 2003, probably fearing that the Bush-Cheney regime would use his previous funding of certain groups the US designates as “terrorists” as justification to lump him in with the “Axis of Evil” list, Gaddafi renounced radical Muslim jihadists and handed over all his weapons of mass destruction (WMD’s) in a move that even Time magazine recognized by writing “Now Gaddafi’s a Good Guy”. He then established full diplomatic relations with the US shortly afterwards. Unfortunately, it wouldn’t last, since he’s wasn’t privy to a secret US military plan within the Pentagon hierarchy to take out 7 countries in 5 years including Libya. This plan was specifically told to Wesley Clark, who had been the Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, by a 3-Star general in the Pentagon late in 2001. The countries that this general mentioned the Pentagon was going to take out were: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finally ending with Iran. Later on in 2008, neocon Douglas Feith (under-secretary of defense for policy at the time) said that Donald Rumsfeld had sent a letter to President Bush on September 30th, 2001 that the US should seek to establish “new regimes” in the seven countries I’ve just enumerated.
After 9/11, the Neocons that came to power under the Bush-Cheney White House had previously written what their geopolitical playbook would be with “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” under the aegis of a Neocon think tank known as Project for the New American Century (PNAC), wherein they advocated that the US use its military might to project its power abroad to protect its “national interests” (i.e. US multinationals like Exxon-Mobile) and prevent any other country from becoming a legitimate rival to US hegemony now that the Soviet Union had dissolved as a major super power in the world. Another somewhat more covert (though no less important) aspect of US foreign policy as it pertains to the Middle East is its unequivocal support, both economically and politically, for the State of Israel that includes its illegal territorial ambitions in the region. We’ll deal with that later; for now let’s go back to Libya.
Prior to the French and US led NATO attack back in 2011, on behalf of radical Islamic jihadists in the Benghazi region, Libya was a flourishing and prosperous country. Gaddafi shared his country’s oil profits with his citizenry, had developed the largest agricultural irrigation project in the world helping to green the country for farmers, would advance $20,000 to newly married couples, and had the highest standard of living out of any African country. Where he made a fatal mistake, however, in terms of so-called US as well as French “national interests” is when he began to advocate for what he called a “Pan-African Union”. A major part of this philosophy was an economic system to fund their own development projects outside the control of the predatory IMF/World Bank system and the French domination of Francophone countries that would be backed in part by the Libyan Dinar, which was subsequently backed by gold and silver. This would not be tolerated by the IMF/World Bank nor France, who have always sought to plunder Africa’s rich mineral, oil, and precious metal resources on the one hand, while keeping the countries of Africa exploited and enslaved to debt on the other hand.
Disrupting that scenario, as Gaddafi did, is what triggered the coup d’etat of Western-backed rebel jihadists, who would take over the country only with the massive aerial bombing support by NATO fighter jets. So, even though the vast majority of the Libyan people were pro-Gaddafi, you had a handful of radical jihadists (including Al-Qaeda of North Africa and the Al-Nusra Front), who began an insurrection against him. Naturally, Gaddafi launched a counter-offensive, where he had practically wiped out these radical jihadists with very little bloodshed. The only stronghold left that they still controlled was in the city of Benghazi. At one point, he told the “rebels” to throw down their weapons, and they wouldn’t be harmed. However, it is at this stage in the campaign that the US State Department under Secretary Hillary Clinton pressed for attacking Gaddafi under the assumption that to do nothing would lead to a “bloodbath” of the civilian population in Benghazi. International human rights organizations like Amnesty International knew that it was an absurd claim, given that there was no indication that Gaddafi would risk being ostracized by the world community by committing such atrocities against his own people. But, as usual, lies and BS hysterics won out, and NATO launched a major bombing campaign against the Libyan army to aid the rebels in taking over the country, where it very quickly descended into civil war and chaos.
It is now known that military intervention into Libya by NATO wasn’t anything to do with humanitarian reasons. Even then Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta admitted in his memoirs that, “our goal in Libya was regime change.” As documented by David Ray Griffin in his excellent book, Bush and Cheney: How They Ruined America and the World, when Gaddafi’s own son, Saif, along with other high-ranking members of the Libyan regime tried to negotiate a resolution, Hillary Clinton told a general at the Pentagon to refuse to take the calls, since as an intelligence asset working with the Joint Chiefs of Staff told Saif, “Secretary Clinton does not want to negotiate at all.” So, if anyone was out for blood, it was then Secretary Hillary Clinton. After Gaddafi’s beaten, bruised, bloodied, and bayoneted dead body was shown in a video by the Benghazi jihadists, who would later kill US Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other staff members- Hillary Clinton crowed, “We came, we saw, he died.” By 2016, at least 100,000 Libyans left for Europe adding substantially to the refugee crisis there that continues to push their social service systems to the brink of collapse. And, after Gaddafi was taken out, his enormous weapons arsenal ended up in the hands of Al-Qaeda, Al-Nusra, and ISIS terrorists around the world, including Syria, where many went to fight a proxy war on behalf of what has become the US-Israel-Qatar-Saudi Arabian nexus against Syria’s Assad regime.
In fact, as I’ve discussed in a previous article about Libya, US Ambassador Christopher Stevens was helping the CIA and Pentagon under General David Petraeus run weapons out to radical jihadist groups that would later pop up in Syria and attempt to topple Assad. The consulate was little more than a convenient cover for this to take place. According to famed investigative reporter, Seymour Hersh, in an article published in the London Review of Books entitled “The Red Line and the Rat Line”:
“In January, the Senate Intelligence Committee released a report on the assault by a local militia in September 2012 on the American consulate and a nearby undercover CIA facility in Benghazi, which resulted in the death of the US ambassador, Christopher Stevens, and three others. The report’s criticism of the State Department for not providing adequate security at the consulate, and of the intelligence community for not alerting the US military to the presence of a CIA outpost in the area, received front-page coverage and revived animosities in Washington, with Republicans accusing Obama and Hillary Clinton of a cover-up. A highly classified annex to the report, not made public, described a secret agreement reached in early 2012 between the Obama and Erdoğan administrations. It pertained to the rat line. By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria. A number of front companies were set up in Libya, some under the cover of Australian entities. Retired American soldiers, who didn’t always know who was really employing them, were hired to manage procurement and shipping. The operation was run by David Petraeus, the CIA director who would soon resign when it became known he was having an affair with his biographer.”
While Clinton claimed that she knew nothing about the weapons transfer taking place during the congressional hearings into the Benghazi scandal, Judicial Watch and Wiki-Leaks were able to show definitely that she was not only aware, she was actively pushing for weapons to be sent to “jihadists within Syria, including ISIS.”
Moving onto Syria, we learn that there are hidden motives, forces, and players at work, should we care to look below the surface of what is clearly one of the worst humanitarian crises on the planet right now. As I stated previously, Syria was on the list of 7 countries that the Pentagon wanted to orchestrate regime change against, but the $64,000 question is, “Why do they want to topple Syria’s Bashar al Assad?” Fundamentally speaking, the war is about the control of pipelines. According to long-time energy and geopolitical researcher, F. William Engdahl, “it became clear to some geopolitical Washington strategists that Qatar could play a strategic role in pushing Russia out of the EU natural gas game and put a US-controlled supplier, Qatar, in the dominant role.” That’s why back in 2009 the Emir of Qatar, who owns the largest gas fields in the world, went to Damascus to make a proposition to Syrian President Bashar al Assad. He proposed the construction of a natural gas pipeline that would begin in Qatar, cross over into Saudi Arabia and Syria, and finally end in Turkey, where the gas would be sold to the lucrative EU markets.
Assad, however, declined the offer, saying that he wanted to “protect the interests of [his] Russian ally, which is Europe’s top supplier of natural gas.” As Engdahl says, “This was the beginning of the NATO decision to militarily destroy the Assad regime.” Instead, Syria decided to broker a deal for an alternative route that would run a pipeline from Iran through Iraq and on to Syria thereby leaving Qatar and Turkey out in the cold. In July of 2012, the three countries of Iran, Iraq, and Syria signed a Memorandum of Understanding, which officially outlined the proposed pipeline sometimes called the “Shi’ite Pipeline”. Besides bringing great riches to Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, should Assad be defeated and the pipeline built, the war had at least three main goals. According to geopolitical analyst Dmitry Minin, they were:
1) Break Russia’s gas monopoly in Europe. (Russia currently supplies around 40% to the EU market…not a complete monopoly but clearly the largest seller)
2) Free Turkey from its dependence on Iranian gas.
3) Give Israel the chance to export its gas to Europe by land at less cost.
As I’ve pointed out in my past articles on the Para-Political Journal, Israel has definite geopolitical goals in the Middle East, which contribute greatly to its chaotic conditions as well as the Muslim world’s hatred of the US for being their primary unconditional ally. But, just what are Israel’s long-term geopolitical goals in the Middle East? One of the best sources for understanding those goals comes from Christopher Bollyn’s book The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East. It’s in that book that he discusses what’s called the “Yinon Plan” based on the work of an Israeli strategist named Oded Yinon, who wrote about the plan in a document called “A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties”. Published in Hebrew back in 1982 by the World Zionist Organization’s Department of Information, the “Yinon Plan” (as it’s commonly known as) calls for “the destruction of the armies of large Arab states and the Balkanization of their nations into ethnic mini-states.” In the English version, under the title The Zionist Plan for the Middle East, Yinon states:
“The Western front, which on the surface appears more problematic, is in fact less complicated than the Eastern front, in which most of the events that make the headlines have been taking place recently. Lebanon’s dissolution into five provinces serves as a precedent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and the Arabian Peninsula, and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi’ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach today.”
This was written when Israeli attacks against Lebanon were at their fiercest, turning cities like Beirut into a similar kind of war zone hell hole that we see in places like Syria’s Aleppo today. Millions have fled into neighboring countries and migrated as far north as Sweden in the EU. As Christopher Bollyn relates in the book, “The Zionist vision for the Middle East rests on two essential premises: To survive, Israel must become an imperial regional power, and must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states.” And, this is precisely what’s occurring in the Middle East with the US-Israeli plans to redraw the map of the Arab states according to their own geopolitical strategies, which although not exactly the same certainly dovetail together. Despite what Neocon and Neo-Liberal politicians try to tell us, the Zionist plans for the Middle East most certainly are not in our best interests. As Linda Heard in an article entitled “Is the US Waging Israel’s Wars?” tells us:
“There is one thing that we do know. Oded Yinon’s 1982 Zionist Plan for the Middle East is in large part taking shape. Is this pure coincidence? Was Yinon a gifted psychic? Perhaps! Alternatively, we in the West are victims of a long-held agenda not of our making and without doubt not in our interests.”
Finally, I’d like to address the cultural, social, and ethnic destruction of Europe due to the millions of Arabs, who have migrated into the EU due to in large part to the proxy wars being fought in the Middle East (particularly those of Libya and Syria that I’ve documented thus far). However, in spite of real refugees in certain war-torn countries, there are also greater economic, political, and social opportunities available that are drawing people to migrate to Europe that simply don’t exist in many Middle Eastern countries. European countries, many of which are still trying to recover from the devastation of the 2008 financial crash, are now having their social service systems put under even greater strain by being forced by their own governments to accept millions of Arab immigrants, most of whom aren’t interested in culturally assimilating whatsoever. European countries such as France, Germany, and Sweden that have allowed for the greatest number of Arabs to migrate in are also experiencing a huge rise in crimes (thefts, assaults, rapes, murders, etc.) committed against their domestic population, which has quite naturally led to a rise in nationalist/identity movements in spite of the mostly PC climate among the establishment that dismisses their concerns as nothing but racist “Islamophobia”.
The question that politicians like France’s Emmanuel Macron or Germany’s Angela Merkel simply refuse to answer, it would seem, is: “Does a sovereign country have the right to defend their national culture, ethnic heritage, language, religious values, and integrity against total dissolution by an outside foreign element that seeks to replace it?” If the answer is “yes”, then the EU would be wise to limit how many immigrants they allow in before a civil war erupts between the newly arrived mostly Muslim and mostly Arab immigrants and the mostly Christian and mostly white European nationals. When you look at a documentary on Sweden’s current immigrant crisis, for example, especially when reports about Swedish girls being raped by the recent transplants go unaddressed by the justice system, I think it’s high time that Europe start seriously thinking about stemming the tide of migrants flooding into their countries before they wake up one day and can’t recognize their own country anymore. Many are already saying just that. As unbelievable as it might sound, however, even the massive amount of migrants flooding into Europe from Middle Eastern countries could well be part of a social engineering program that was actually outlined in detail some 100 years ago by a man many consider to be the “father of the European Union”. This man is Count Richard Nikolas von Coudenhove-Kalergi.
As documented in the book The Killing of Uncle Sam, “Coudenhove-Kalergi became an advocate for Woodrow Wilson’s ‘Fourteen Points’ and the pacific initiatives of Karl Hiller. In 1921, he joined the Masonic lodge Humanitas, which he used as the launching pad for his Pan Europa movement. One year later, he published the Pan Europa manifesto, which captured the attention of Baron Louis de Rothschild and Max Warburg (father of Paul, the founder of the Federal Reserve), who opted to fund the movement to unify Europe with 60,000 gold marks. In his books Praktischer Idealismus and Kampf im Paneuropa, Coudenhove-Kalergi argued for the dissolution of national borders and the promotion of mass allogenic (genetically dissimilar) immigration. The result of this immigration, Coudenhove-Kalergi wrote, would be the creation of ‘the men of the future,’ whom he called mestizos. Such men would be of mixed Caucasian, Negro, and Asiatic blood and would appear ‘very similar to the ancient Egyptians’. The mongrelization of mankind, according to Coudenhove-Kalergi, would produce salubrious results, such as the dissolution of nationalism, the elimination of racism, and the eradication of disparities in levels of human intelligence. Since the mestizos would be of limited intelligence, Coudenhove-Kalergi maintained, they could be easily manipulated and controlled by ‘Jewish leaders of socialism’ (herrenmenschen), who had been singled out by divine providence to rule the world.”
So, here is Coudenhove-Kalergi talking about the dissolution of national borders via a Pan Europa superstate, mass genetically-dissimilar immigration, the creation of a mestizo racially mixed “man of the future” that looks similar to the beige color of the ancient Egyptian (albeit with very limited intelligence), and the control of such a thoroughly mixed and culturally inert population by a Jewish socialist elite, whom divine providence has made them “with their most exalted unselfishness, to erase the original sin of capitalism, to free people from injustice, violence, and subservience and to change the redeemed world into an earthly paradise”. Reading that last quote, I’m thinking, “What are you, fucking nuts?! Take a look at the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, if you want to get a sense of what Jewish injustice, violence, and subservience really looks like rather than being so deluded as to thinking they’re going to free you from it.” But, as crazy as his theories are to my mind, he was able to garner some very powerful support and backing, which again appear to be playing itself out on the world stage now.
After WWII broke out, Coudenhove-Kalergi first fled to France and then to the US after the Nazis invaded in 1940 where he came under the care of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) that has essentially dominated US foreign policy since their founding in 1921. During that time, he helped to draft the wartime strategy of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) and the postwar plans for the revitalization of Europe. Among his many disciples included such notable and powerful men as Senator William Fulbright, Allen Dulles, Thomas W. Braden, William J. Donovan, Arthur Goldberg, Jay Lovestone, and Joseph H. Retinger, who worked together to create the American Committee for a United Europe. This committee would then give rise to the European Coal and Steel Community, which was the predecessor to the European Union. This man was very well respected by some of the highest ranking men in the councils of government, as this list clearly shows and as his duties entailed, and this is only proven further when in 1950 he received the first annual Karlpreis (Charlemagne Award) for his contribution to European ideals. And, as far as Coudenhove-Kalergi is concerned, part of those “European ideals” apparently calls for the elimination of the Caucasian race and the creation of a socialist Superstate in a similar vein as to what the EU actually is today. Now, with an understanding of the writings of Coudenhove-Kalergi firmly in mind, suddenly the cultural crisis stemming from the mass migration from Arab countries aided and abetted by certain well-placed NGO’s that have a far reaching agenda for Europe, we can begin to see that it’s perhaps not such an accident after all but rather the playing out of Kalergi’s Pan Europa Plan.
Griffin, David Ray. Bush and Cheney: How They Ruined America and the World. Olive Branch Press, 2017.
Bollyn, Christopher. The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East. 2017
Howard-Browne, Rodney and Paul L. Williams. The Killing of Uncle Sam: The Demise of the United States of America. River Publishing, 2018.
Solving the 911 Mystery (Part 1): The Israeli Connection
“The deathly precision of the attacks and the magnitude of planning would have required years of planning. Such a sophisticated operation would require the fixed frame of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a loose group like the one led by the student Mohammed Atta in Hamburg.” -Eckehardt Werthebach (Former President of Germany’s Verfassungsschutz Intelligence Service)
As you’re no doubt well aware, this year marks the 15th Anniversary of the 911 Attacks, which claimed the lives of close to 3,000 people. During the past 15 years, America has not only been irrevocably been transformed into complete corporate fascist police state put into perpetual high alert and fear of a nebulous enemy that are almost always Arab and/or Muslim, but our country has also embarked upon the dangerous and bloody business of fighting wars abroad in the name of the oxymoron slogan “War on Terror”, wherein the US claims to be preemptively targeting “state-sponsors of terrorism”. However, what if some the biggest state-sponsors of terrorism were actually considered our closest political allies? And, what if there were credible evidence that some of the real architects of the 911 Attacks weren’t Afghani, Pakistani, or even Saudi but actually Israeli? Would you really want to know? While this evidence is considered controversial, even among many within the 911 Truth movement, I believe that it is some of the most compelling and substantial evidence there is in determining just who the guilty culprits involved in the 911 actually are. Unfortunately, you will never see a true unbiased investigation into the events of September 11th, 2001 by either the US government or the mainstream media in this country. Therefore, it is up to the alternative media like Para-Political Journal to take it up.
For a much fuller and detailed account of the Israeli Connection to 911, I highly suggest you read Christopher Bollyn’s book Solving 911: The Deception That Changed The World. I picked up a copy from Bollyn himself, who gave an excellent talk at the recent “911 Truth Fest” in Austin, TX on the 15th Year Anniversary. You can watch the entirety of the Fest on-line that is now archived on Livestream by the host, Ron Avery, or simply start it around the 1 hr. 13 min. mark to see Christopher Bollyn’s stellar presentation. Needless to say, he’s an extremely courageous man to be writing and speaking about this little known and under investigated aspect of 911, even though it goes straight to the heart of some of the culprits in what is clearly a false-flag attack, since to broach this topic in media circles is certain career suicide along with being labeled a “Crazy Conspiracy Theorist” and (even worse in the public domain) an “Anti-Semite”. However, how many people know what the current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu actually said the day after September 11th, 2001? As the New York Times reported:
Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu replied, “It’s very good.” Then, he edited himself: “Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.”
Much later on, in April of 2008, the Israeli newspapers Haaretz and Ma’ariv reported on Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech at Bar Ilan university where he said:
“We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq.”
He went on to say that it was 911 attacks that swung opinion to Israel’s favor. Of course, Benjamin Netanyahu is a hardliner member of the Likud Party, which is the Israeli equivalent of the Neocon, wherein it is vehemently pro-Zionist and very hawkish in matters pertaining to the daily sufferings of the Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza. When you consider how the Apartheid State of Israel wants to topple certain Middle Eastern regimes it considers threats to its security as well as continue its illegal territorial expansions into the Golan Heights, the Sinai, Jordan, Lebanon, and even parts of Syria– it begins to make strategic sense from a Machiavellian point of view, of course, why Israel would seek to manipulate the US into fighting proxy wars on its behalf. After all, if you can use the full power and weight of the most powerful military force on the planet to do the fighting and dying…then you can preserve your own military from undertaking such an arduous task and deflect some of the enmity of your neighbors towards your very useful tool, while getting rid of your enemies all in one fell swoop. Also, let’s not forget that among the Project for the New American Century gang that ushered in the Bush-Cheney Neocons were Zionists like Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Donald Rumsfeld, Robert Kagan, Elliot Abrams, and William Kristol, who could push the Bush Administration into a war against Iraq irregardless of their complete non-involvement with Al-Qaida and the Taliban.
In addition to a clear geo-political motive and the ideological parallels between Bush Cabinet PNAC Neocons and their Likud Zionist counterparts, there is also evidence that Israeli Intelligence (specifically Mossad) has penetrated into the deepest levels of our government, telecommunications industry, security systems, aviation industry, and high-level software and technology infrastructure to the point that it could feasibly pull off an operation as sophisticated as the 911, particularly if we consider the fact that jet fuel alone couldn’t have possibly brought down the Twin Towers. Once you’ve studied the voluminous evidence of Active Thermitic Material found in the dust debris at Ground Zero as Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, David Ray Griffin, BYU Physics Professor Steven Jones and his team of scientists that wrote an in-depth scientific published in a peer-reviewed chemical journal did exhaustively– the natural question that arises is, “Who had the kind of lengthy access to the elevator shafts, various floors inside the building, and control over the security in order to place tons of explosive super thermitic material throughout the WTC Complex for its eventual destruction, including the 47 story building of WTC 7 that was never hit by any plane that day?” Let’s consider this crucial evidence, including that of controlled demolition of the World Trade Center buildings.
First, let’s recall that the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) began investigating a group of Israelis posing as “Art Students” back in January of 2000, who had penetrated a number of major US government facilities. While it is known that Israeli criminal gangs are some of the major traffickers of the drug Ecstasy, these spies also managed to penetrate places like Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma City that houses the AWACS surveillance craft and Stealth Bombers. According to various news reports once the story was leaked to the press by the DEA, some 120 Israeli nationals were apprehended and exported on VISA violations although many are thought to remain at large. The question is- “Who authorized this massive spying operation into sensitive US government facilities?” And, what (if anything) did it have to do with 911, as it was certainly ongoing up through Sept. 11th 2001?
FOX News Correspondent, Carl Cameron, broke this story in the US media with a 4 Part Report that covered not only the “Art Student” spy ring but also Israeli control over a telecommunications system called Amdocs, which was funneling practically every US phone call directly to Israel. He also spoke about the rarely mentioned scandal of a small software company called P-Tech that was raided by the FBI after it was determined to have connections with known terrorist sympathizers. P-Tech software was being run on FAA and NORAD computers and could exploit holes in their systems to in effect cause the kind of mass confusion and chaos we saw that day in communications and the delays in scrambling fighter jets, which hasn’t been officially accounted for. We’ll come back to detail P-Tech later, since it’s a crucial link in the 911 operation. Unfortunately, Carl Cameron’s groundbreaking revelations never were picked up by any other major media outlet, and FOX News even yanked the article from their website shortly after it was posted. When asked about it on C-SPAN, Carl Cameron seemed to think that FOX News was merely making room for greater news coverage of the war, but (having seen censorship operate before on sensitive stories) I’m not buying that explanation as to why it was taken out of the archives. Fortunately, another 911 researcher by the name of Rebekah Roth followed the bread crumbs to some very interesting pictures that revealed one of the most “explosive” revelations as to what some of these Mossad spies posing as “Art Students” were doing on a floor inside the World Trade Center. Check out her video on YouTube where she describes what she discovered, and make up your own mind about what exactly it means in the larger context of 911.
We also now know that Israelis were given an early warning not to come to work that day in Lower Manhattan. This is because someone using Odigo, which is one of the largest “instant messaging” companies and has its headquarters two blocks from the WTC, sent out an early warning message to at least two of its employees that there was going to be an attack in New York some two hours before it actually happened. According to a Vice President for Odigo, the messaging system has a feature that allows it send messages based on particular interests and demographics. In other words, you can specify a message to be sent based on someone’s nationality like say…Israeli.
In addition to the curious early warning to Odigo employees, the Zim-American Israeli Shipping Co. apparently also showed signs that they knew what was coming and vacated their 16th Floor offices in the WTC one week prior to the 911 attacks. The Zim Shipping Co. had announced some 6 months before that they were moving to Norfolk, VA, and there were only 10 employees out of more than 200 left in the building on 911. However, all ten managed to escape alive. The only Israeli company still left in the WTC Towers is called ClearForest that had about 18 employees, and the handful in the building that day all were able to escape in time. Interestingly, the Israeli government actually owns half of the Zim Shipping Co.
There was another shipping/trucking company that was being used as a Mossad front on 911 that is even stranger than Zim. This company is called Urban Moving Systems, and its owner is a man by the name of Dominic Suter. The FBI told ABC News that “Urban Moving Systems may have been providing cover for an Israeli intelligence operation.” The reason for their suspicions about Urban Moving Systems were raised when a woman calls police and the FBI regarding “Five Dancing Israelis”, who were seen filming the burning WTC Towers from the roof of their company’s building. The witness to this bizarre event described them as mocking of the day’s disaster with obvious expressions of happiness and joy. When the police pulled over their “Urban Moving Systems” labeled van, one man is found with $4,700 in his sock and another had two passports on his person. According to the local investigators, they found “maps of the city in the car with certain places highlighted”. As one of the officials described, “It looked like they’re hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen.” You can now even hear the actual police dispatch voice recordings of when they found an Urban Moving Systems van painted with mural depicting a plane flying into the Twin Towers. The FBI later discovers that at least two of them, the brothers Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, are Mossad agents. Although the FBI supposedly interrogates them for weeks, they are released 71 days after their arrest on immigration violations and return to Israel. Three of them (Oded Ellner, Omer Marmari, and Yari Shmuel) even go on Israeli television to talk about the whole ordeal. Are we supposed to believe that this was simply bureaucratic snafu and slip up?
One report speculated that the “Israeli Art Student” spy ring investigated by the DEA was so sloppy and brazen that it was a diversion or decoy to the real Mossad spy ring that could accomplish its goals much more professionally undetected. This makes sense insofar as the art of spy craft goes. However, even with so many “decoys” being caught with box cutters, high-lighted maps, video tapes of sky scrappers, multiple passports, computer hard drives, abnormal amounts of cash, residue from explosive material, etc., why were they were all let go after a brief period of detention? In other words, no matter how guilty they seemed to be or actually were in their espionage, surveillance, and covert operations to bring the WTC Towers down via nano-thermite as Steven Jones, Richard Gage, David Ray Griffin, etc. have shown, they were totally immune to prosecution for their crimes. Clearly, they have friends in very high places to include the FBI, CIA, and White House. In the case of the FBI, for example, the Assistant Attorney General was Michael Chertoff. As Christopher Bollyn says, “Having a dedicated Zionist agent in the key position, as Assistant Attorney General controlling the criminal division of the Department of Justice, gave the Israelis the operational security to carry out this massive crime without fear of exposure or prosecution. It should be noted that Chertoff also played a key role in the prosecution of the 1993 false-flag terror bombing at the World Trade Center.”
Needless to say, what I’ve presented so far in this article is just the tip of a very dirty, complex, and suppressed iceberg of complicity via the Israeli Connection to the crimes of 911. And, even this is just one part of an even larger conspiracy that involves a financial coup, which if you knew the details of would stagger your imagination. However, the important thing to keep in mind when considering the huge scope of the largest single day mass murder in American history is to not fixate on any one anomaly or even several anomalies to the event (interesting though they may be) in isolation but rather to attempt to piece together all those anomalous news stories, buried in the back pages of the US media and more prominently displayed in the foreign media, in order to begin to see the real overall picture and narrative as to what took place that day.
In other words, you have to begin to think “conspiratorially” as well along the lines of-“Who was in control of the architectural, managerial, operational, and working level of the 911 attacks?” And, you have to look at the choke points of the entire operation to know how it can not only override the regular operating procedures and protocol that day such as shipping the scrap iron to particular junk yards where it can be cut up and shipped to Asian recycling plants to be melted down. These are the kinds of questions that have to not only be asked but answered correctly, if you’re ever going to get to the truth along with obvious ones like “Qui Bono?”. Much more to come in Part 2 of this series.
Leave a comment | tags: 15th Year Anniversary of 911 Attacks, 911 False Narrative, Benjamin Netanyahu's Comments About 911, Carl Cameron, Christopher Bollyn, Dancing Israeli Students, DEA Investigation of Israeli Art Students, Israeli Art Student Spy Ring, Israeli Territorial Ambitions, Michael Chertoff as Israeli Agent, Mossad and 911, Mossad Fronts, Odigo, P-Tech and 911, PNAC and Zionism, Solving the 911 Mystery, The Israeli Connection to 911, Thermite in Dust of WTC Towers, Urban Moving Systems, Who Brought the Towers Down?, Who Did 911?, Zim Shipping, Zionist Infiltration of the US | posted in False Flag Operations, The 9/11 File, Uncategorized