The Roots of Europe’s Destruction and the Chaos in the Middle East

The roots of the European migrant crisis, which of course is directly tied to the proxy wars and chaos in the Middle East (particularly in places like Libya and Syria), run through foreign policy objectives implemented by Washington and Tel Aviv. This article will address them both, since that’s the only way you’ll be able to grasp what’s really going on as opposed to the constant media spin and propaganda we’re subjected to on a daily basis. First, let’s look at the US and NATO’s role in the attack on Libya and the underlying reasons for Gaddafi’s killing that naturally led to Libya becoming a completely failed state and breeding ground for terrorists.

Back in 2003, probably fearing that the Bush-Cheney regime would use his previous funding of certain groups the US designates as “terrorists” as justification to lump him in with the “Axis of Evil” list, Gaddafi renounced radical Muslim jihadists and handed over all his weapons of mass destruction (WMD’s) in a move that even Time magazine recognized by writing “Now Gaddafi’s a Good Guy”. He then established full diplomatic relations with the US shortly afterwards. Unfortunately, it wouldn’t last, since he’s wasn’t privy to a secret US military plan within the Pentagon hierarchy to take out 7 countries in 5 years including Libya. This plan was specifically told to Wesley Clark, who had been the Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, by a 3-Star general in the Pentagon late in 2001. The countries that this general mentioned the Pentagon was going to take out were: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finally ending with Iran. Later on in 2008, neocon Douglas Feith (under-secretary of defense for policy at the time) said that Donald Rumsfeld had sent a letter to President Bush on September 30th, 2001 that the US should seek to establish “new regimes” in the seven countries I’ve just enumerated.

After 9/11, the Neocons that came to power under the Bush-Cheney White House had previously written what their geopolitical playbook would be with “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” under the aegis of a Neocon think tank known as Project for the New American Century (PNAC), wherein they advocated that the US use its military might to project its power abroad to protect its “national interests” (i.e. US multinationals like Exxon-Mobile) and prevent any other country from becoming a legitimate rival to US hegemony now that the Soviet Union had dissolved as a major super power in the world. Another somewhat more covert (though no less important) aspect of US foreign policy as it pertains to the Middle East is its unequivocal support, both economically and politically, for the State of Israel that includes its illegal territorial ambitions in the region. We’ll deal with that later; for now let’s go back to Libya.

Prior to the French and US led NATO attack back in 2011, on behalf of radical Islamic jihadists in the Benghazi region, Libya was a flourishing and prosperous country. Gaddafi shared his country’s oil profits with his citizenry, had developed the largest agricultural irrigation project in the world helping to green the country for farmers, would advance $20,000 to newly married couples, and had the highest standard of living out of any African country. Where he made a fatal mistake, however, in terms of so-called US as well as French “national interests” is when he began to advocate for what he called a “Pan-African Union”. A major part of this philosophy was an economic system to fund their own development projects outside the control of the predatory IMF/World Bank system and the French domination of Francophone countries that would be backed in part by the Libyan Dinar, which was subsequently backed by gold and silver. This would not be tolerated by the IMF/World Bank nor France, who have always sought to plunder Africa’s rich mineral, oil, and precious metal resources on the one hand, while keeping the countries of Africa exploited and enslaved to debt on the other hand.

Disrupting that scenario, as Gaddafi did, is what triggered the coup d’etat of Western-backed rebel jihadists, who would take over the country only with the massive aerial bombing support by NATO fighter jets. So, even though the vast majority of the Libyan people were pro-Gaddafi, you had a handful of radical jihadists (including Al-Qaeda of North Africa and the Al-Nusra Front), who began an insurrection against him. Naturally, Gaddafi launched a counter-offensive, where he had practically wiped out these radical jihadists with very little bloodshed. The only stronghold left that they still controlled was in the city of Benghazi. At one point, he told the “rebels” to throw down their weapons, and they wouldn’t be harmed. However, it is at this stage in the campaign that the US State Department under Secretary Hillary Clinton pressed for attacking Gaddafi under the assumption that to do nothing would lead to a “bloodbath” of the civilian population in Benghazi. International human rights organizations like Amnesty International knew that it was an absurd claim, given that there was no indication that Gaddafi would risk being ostracized by the world community by committing such atrocities against his own people. But, as usual, lies and BS hysterics won out, and NATO launched a major bombing campaign against the Libyan army to aid the rebels in taking over the country, where it very quickly descended into civil war and chaos.

It is now known that military intervention into Libya by NATO wasn’t anything to do with humanitarian reasons. Even then Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta admitted in his memoirs that, “our goal in Libya was regime change.” As documented by David Ray Griffin in his excellent book, Bush and Cheney: How They Ruined America and the World, when Gaddafi’s own son, Saif, along with other high-ranking members of the Libyan regime tried to negotiate a resolution, Hillary Clinton told a general at the Pentagon to refuse to take the calls, since as an intelligence asset working with the Joint Chiefs of Staff told Saif, “Secretary Clinton does not want to negotiate at all.” So, if anyone was out for blood, it was then Secretary Hillary Clinton. After Gaddafi’s beaten, bruised, bloodied, and bayoneted dead body was shown in a video by the Benghazi jihadists, who would later kill US Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other staff members- Hillary Clinton crowed, “We came, we saw, he died.” By 2016, at least 100,000 Libyans left for Europe adding substantially to the refugee crisis there that continues to push their social service systems to the brink of collapse. And, after Gaddafi was taken out, his enormous weapons arsenal ended up in the hands of Al-Qaeda, Al-Nusra, and ISIS terrorists around the world, including Syria, where many went to fight a proxy war on behalf of what has become the US-Israel-Qatar-Saudi Arabian nexus against Syria’s Assad regime.

In fact, as I’ve discussed in a previous article about Libya, US Ambassador Christopher Stevens was helping the CIA and Pentagon under General David Petraeus run weapons out to radical jihadist groups that would later pop up in Syria and attempt to topple Assad. The consulate was little more than a convenient cover for this to take place. According to famed investigative reporter, Seymour Hersh, in an article published in the London Review of Books entitled “The Red Line and the Rat Line”:

“In January, the Senate Intelligence Committee released a report on the assault by a local militia in September 2012 on the American consulate and a nearby undercover CIA facility in Benghazi, which resulted in the death of the US ambassador, Christopher Stevens, and three others. The report’s criticism of the State Department for not providing adequate security at the consulate, and of the intelligence community for not alerting the US military to the presence of a CIA outpost in the area, received front-page coverage and revived animosities in Washington, with Republicans accusing Obama and Hillary Clinton of a cover-up. A highly classified annex to the report, not made public, described a secret agreement reached in early 2012 between the Obama and Erdoğan administrations. It pertained to the rat line. By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria. A number of front companies were set up in Libya, some under the cover of Australian entities. Retired American soldiers, who didn’t always know who was really employing them, were hired to manage procurement and shipping. The operation was run by David Petraeus, the CIA director who would soon resign when it became known he was having an affair with his biographer.”

 

While Clinton claimed that she knew nothing about the weapons transfer taking place during the congressional hearings into the Benghazi scandal, Judicial Watch and Wiki-Leaks were able to show definitely that she was not only aware, she was actively pushing for weapons to be sent to “jihadists within Syria, including ISIS.”

Moving onto Syria, we learn that there are hidden motives, forces, and players at work, should we care to look below the surface of what is clearly one of the worst humanitarian crises on the planet right now. As I stated previously, Syria was on the list of 7 countries that the Pentagon wanted to orchestrate regime change against, but the $64,000 question is, “Why do they want to topple Syria’s Bashar al Assad?” Fundamentally speaking, the war is about the control of pipelines. According to long-time energy and geopolitical researcher, F. William Engdahl, “it became clear to some geopolitical Washington strategists that Qatar could play a strategic role in pushing Russia out of the EU natural gas game and put a US-controlled supplier, Qatar, in the dominant role.” That’s why back in 2009 the Emir of Qatar, who owns the largest gas fields in the world, went to Damascus to make a proposition to Syrian President Bashar al Assad. He proposed the construction of a natural gas pipeline that would begin in Qatar, cross over into Saudi Arabia and Syria, and finally end in Turkey, where the gas would be sold to the lucrative EU markets.

Assad, however, declined the offer, saying that he wanted to “protect the interests of [his] Russian ally, which is Europe’s top supplier of natural gas.” As Engdahl says, “This was the beginning of the NATO decision to militarily destroy the Assad regime.” Instead, Syria decided to broker a deal for an alternative route that would run a pipeline from Iran through Iraq and on to Syria thereby leaving Qatar and Turkey out in the cold. In July of 2012, the three countries of Iran, Iraq, and Syria signed a Memorandum of Understanding, which officially outlined the proposed pipeline sometimes called the “Shi’ite Pipeline”. Besides bringing great riches to Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, should Assad be defeated and the pipeline built, the war had at least three main goals. According to geopolitical analyst Dmitry Minin, they were:

1) Break Russia’s gas monopoly in Europe. (Russia currently supplies around 40% to the EU market…not a complete monopoly but clearly the largest seller)

2) Free Turkey from its dependence on Iranian gas.

3) Give Israel the chance to export its gas to Europe by land at less cost.

As I’ve pointed out in my past articles on the Para-Political Journal, Israel has definite geopolitical goals in the Middle East, which contribute greatly to its chaotic conditions as well as the Muslim world’s hatred of the US for being their primary unconditional ally. But, just what are Israel’s long-term geopolitical goals in the Middle East? One of the best sources for understanding those goals comes from Christopher Bollyn’s book The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle EastIt’s in that book that he discusses what’s called the “Yinon Plan” based on the work of an Israeli strategist named Oded Yinon, who wrote about the plan in a document called “A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties”. Published in Hebrew back in 1982 by the World Zionist Organization’s Department of Information, the “Yinon Plan” (as it’s commonly known as) calls for “the destruction of the armies of large Arab states and the Balkanization of their nations into ethnic mini-states.” In the English version, under the title The Zionist Plan for the Middle East, Yinon states:

“The Western front, which on the surface appears more problematic, is in fact less complicated than the Eastern front, in which most of the events that make the headlines have been taking place recently. Lebanon’s dissolution into five provinces serves as a precedent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and the Arabian Peninsula, and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi’ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach today.”

This was written when Israeli attacks against Lebanon were at their fiercest, turning cities like Beirut into a similar kind of war zone hell hole that we see in places like Syria’s Aleppo today. Millions have fled into neighboring countries and migrated as far north as Sweden in the EU. As Christopher Bollyn relates in the book, “The Zionist vision for the Middle East rests on two essential premises: To survive, Israel must become an imperial regional power, and must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states.” And, this is precisely what’s occurring in the Middle East with the US-Israeli plans to redraw the map of the Arab states according to their own geopolitical strategies, which although not exactly the same certainly dovetail together. Despite what Neocon and Neo-Liberal politicians try to tell us, the Zionist plans for the Middle East most certainly are not in our best interests. As Linda Heard in an article entitled “Is the US Waging Israel’s Wars?” tells us:

“There is one thing that we do know. Oded Yinon’s 1982 Zionist Plan for the Middle East is in large part taking shape. Is this pure coincidence? Was Yinon a gifted psychic? Perhaps! Alternatively, we in the West are victims of a long-held agenda not of our making and without doubt not in our interests.”

Finally, I’d like to address the cultural, social, and ethnic destruction of Europe due to the millions of Arabs, who have migrated into the EU due to in large part to the proxy wars being fought in the Middle East (particularly those of Libya and Syria that I’ve documented thus far). However, in spite of real refugees in certain war-torn countries, there are also greater economic, political, and social opportunities available that are drawing people to migrate to Europe that simply don’t exist in many Middle Eastern countries. European countries, many of which are still trying to recover from the devastation of the 2008 financial crash, are now having their social service systems put under even greater strain by being forced by their own governments to accept millions of Arab immigrants, most of whom aren’t interested in culturally assimilating whatsoever. European countries such as France, Germany, and Sweden that have allowed for the greatest number of Arabs to migrate in are also experiencing a huge rise in crimes (thefts, assaults, rapes, murders, etc.) committed against their domestic population, which has quite naturally led to a rise in nationalist/identity movements in spite of the mostly PC climate among the establishment that dismisses their concerns as nothing but racist “Islamophobia”.

The question that politicians like France’s Emmanuel Macron or Germany’s Angela Merkel simply refuse to answer, it would seem, is: “Does a sovereign country have the right to defend their national culture, ethnic heritage, language, religious values, and integrity against total dissolution by an outside foreign element that seeks to replace it?” If the answer is “yes”, then the EU would be wise to limit how many immigrants they allow in before a civil war erupts between the newly arrived mostly Muslim and mostly Arab immigrants and the mostly Christian and mostly white European nationals. When you look at a documentary on Sweden’s current immigrant crisis, for example, especially when reports about Swedish girls being raped by the recent transplants go unaddressed by the justice system, I think it’s high time that Europe start seriously thinking about stemming the tide of migrants flooding into their countries before they wake up one day and can’t recognize their own country anymore. Many are already saying just that. As unbelievable as it might sound, however, even the massive amount of migrants flooding into Europe from Middle Eastern countries could well be part of a social engineering program that was actually outlined in detail some 100 years ago by a man many consider to be the “father of the European Union”. This man is Count Richard Nikolas von Coudenhove-Kalergi.

As documented in the book The Killing of Uncle Sam, “Coudenhove-Kalergi became an advocate for Woodrow Wilson’s ‘Fourteen Points’ and the pacific initiatives of Karl Hiller. In 1921, he joined the Masonic lodge Humanitas, which he used as the launching pad for his Pan Europa movement. One year later, he published the Pan Europa manifesto, which captured the attention of Baron Louis de Rothschild and Max Warburg (father of Paul, the founder of the Federal Reserve), who opted to fund the movement to unify Europe with 60,000 gold marks. In his books Praktischer Idealismus and Kampf im Paneuropa, Coudenhove-Kalergi argued for the dissolution of national borders and the promotion of mass allogenic (genetically dissimilar) immigration. The result of this immigration, Coudenhove-Kalergi wrote, would be the creation of ‘the men of the future,’ whom he called mestizos. Such men would be of mixed Caucasian, Negro, and Asiatic blood and would appear ‘very similar to the ancient Egyptians’. The mongrelization of mankind, according to Coudenhove-Kalergi, would produce salubrious results, such as the dissolution of nationalism, the elimination of racism, and the eradication of disparities in levels of human intelligence. Since the mestizos would be of limited intelligence, Coudenhove-Kalergi maintained, they could be easily manipulated and controlled by ‘Jewish leaders of socialism’ (herrenmenschen), who had been singled out by divine providence to rule the world.”

So, here is Coudenhove-Kalergi talking about the dissolution of national borders via a Pan Europa superstate, mass genetically-dissimilar immigration, the creation of a mestizo racially mixed “man of the future” that looks similar to the beige color of the ancient Egyptian (albeit with very limited intelligence), and the control of such a thoroughly mixed and culturally inert population by a Jewish socialist elite, whom divine providence has made them “with their most exalted unselfishness, to erase the original sin of capitalism, to free people from injustice, violence, and subservience and to change the redeemed world into an earthly paradise”. Reading that last quote, I’m thinking, “What are you, fucking nuts?! Take a look at the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, if you want to get a sense of what Jewish injustice, violence, and subservience really looks like rather than being so deluded as to thinking they’re going to free you from it.” But, as crazy as his theories are to my mind, he was able to garner some very powerful support and backing, which again appear to be playing itself out on the world stage now.

After WWII broke out, Coudenhove-Kalergi first fled to France and then to the US after the Nazis invaded in 1940 where he came under the care of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) that has essentially dominated US foreign policy since their founding in 1921. During that time, he helped to draft the wartime strategy of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) and the postwar plans for the revitalization of Europe. Among his many disciples included such notable and powerful men as Senator William Fulbright, Allen Dulles, Thomas W. Braden, William J. Donovan, Arthur Goldberg, Jay Lovestone, and Joseph H. Retinger, who worked together to create the American Committee for a United Europe. This committee would then give rise to the European Coal and Steel Community, which was the predecessor to the European Union. This man was very well respected by some of the highest ranking men in the councils of government, as this list clearly shows and as his duties entailed, and this is only proven further when in 1950 he received the first annual Karlpreis (Charlemagne Award) for his contribution to European ideals. And, as far as Coudenhove-Kalergi is concerned, part of those “European ideals” apparently calls for the elimination of the Caucasian race and the creation of a socialist Superstate in a similar vein as to what the EU actually is today. Now, with an understanding of the writings of Coudenhove-Kalergi firmly in mind, suddenly the cultural crisis stemming from the mass migration from Arab countries aided and abetted by certain well-placed NGO’s that have a far reaching agenda for Europe, we can begin to see that it’s perhaps not such an accident after all but rather the playing out of Kalergi’s Pan Europa Plan.

 

Primary Sources

Griffin, David Ray. Bush and Cheney: How They Ruined America and the World. Olive Branch Press, 2017.

Bollyn, Christopher. The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East. 2017

Howard-Browne, Rodney and Paul L. Williams. The Killing of Uncle Sam: The Demise of the United States of America. River Publishing, 2018.

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

Inside the Sex Trafficking Cult NXIVM

Recently, the leader of what people previously associated with it have described as an “extreme cult” called NXIVM (pronounced “nex-ee-um”) was arrested in Mexico and arraigned in a Texas court, along with an inner circle recruiter and co-conspirator. The leader’s name is Keith Raniere, who also went by the futurist-sounding moniker “Vanguard” among NXIVM members, and the co-conspirator charged (along with him in sex trafficking) is Allison Mack, a former B-list actress who is perhaps best known for her starring role in the TV series “Smallville”. However, when you look at the parts she’s played in both film and TV, they are awash in mind-control symbolism as described by former women, who were former programmed sex slaves. So, for instance, Allison was in the movie “Lost in Oz” that is obviously another spin-off of the original “Wizard of Oz”, the symbolism of which is used extensively in what’s called Monarch Programming (CIA Sex Slave Programming). As I discussed in presentation I gave dealing with what I feel is the most important movie dealing with this taboo subject, Stanley Kubrick’s “Eyes Wide Shut”, even the name “Oz” is significant to the occult if you know what to look for it in Hollywood Babylon.

HOLLYWOOD, CA – AUGUST 01: Allison Mack attends Amazon Studios’ premiere for “Lost In Oz” on August 1, 2017 in Hollywood, California. (Photo by Todd Williamson/Getty Images for Amazon Studios)

Outwardly, NXIVM was a popular New Age-styled so-called “Self Help” organization that promised it could transform peoples’ lives utilizing psychological techniques and methods that, to an uninitiated observer like myself, look an awful lot like mental manipulating methods like Scientology, Neuro-Linguistic Programming, and Landmark Education. However, as behaviorally manipulative as these strategies are in separating gullible people from their hard-earned money, this was merely the outer shell of NXIVM. The inner core of Keith Raniere’s NXIVM cult was made up of very wealthy benefactors of Raniere’s business schemes and lavish lifestyle, including the most prominent (and no doubt generous) of them…Sara and Clare Bronfman. These two sisters are of course the heirs to the Canadian Seagram’s Liquor Company fortune made by Edgar Bronfman Sr., who was very well-connected and powerful in his own time. According available press reports, the Bronfman sisters spent some $150 million to bail out Raniere’s failed commodities bets in the market, another $30 million to purchase real estate in Los Angeles and around Albany, NY, and some $11 million to purchase a 22-seat personal jet.

The fact that Keith Raniere was able to fleece naive and wealthy people out of millions of dollars to take his training courses and listen to his ego-inflating seminars, along with floating his mostly failed business ventures, isn’t surprising or even all that remarkable in the grander scheme of criminal malfeasance. After all, prior to his adopting his New Age guru persona, he ran a pyramid scheme called “Consumers’ Buyline”, which was indicted in New York and several other states for financial fraud and eventually settled out of court for thousands of dollars without admitting to any wrongdoing. Shortly thereafter, around 1998, he started NXIVM that eventually grew to be one of the most influential “Self Help” cults of its kind, with billionaires like Virgin Records founder Richard Branson and millionaires like Emilio Salinas (son of former Mexican president Carlos Salinas) having taken courses. What makes Keith Raniere and NXIVM deeply disturbing is that he was using girls like Allison Mack to recruit women (including underage girls) into his personal harem for sex and (according to an ex-girlfriend) has a documented history of psychological and sexual abuse to include multiple instances of rape.

So, the logical question knowing all this is- “Why did it take so long to finally arrest him under what had been a long history of sexually abusive practices?” While it’s obvious that former members of the secret sex slave sorority within NXIVM called DOS that stands for “Domunus Obsequious Sororium” which loosely translates to “Lord/Master of the Obedient Female Companions” were intimidated in any number of ways from ever leaving the cult and discussing with authorities what took place within the inner confines of their training facilities, there is perhaps another reason why indictments were so slow in coming to fruition. My theory is that NXIVM had some very powerful allies with the kind of political clout to keep them from facing the discordant music of their making even considering that the co-founder of NXIVM was Nancy L. Salzman, a former Clinton Global Initiative member along with Sara and Clare Bronfman. To be a member, you have to be invited and pay at least $15,000 a year in contributions. Allegations from a former inner circle member of NXIVM, Kirsten Keefe, claim that an effort was made by Clare Bronfman to hack into the computer of her own father, Edgar Bronfman Sr., using a log key virus that is able to see a person’s key strokes and therefore break their e-mail passwords. Eventually, Clare was successful, and it allowed Keith Raniere the ability to read Mr. Bronfman’s private e-mails including those sent to his personal friend Hillary Clinton. Even Wiki-Leaks didn’t get all of Hillary Clinton’s e-mails sent over an unprotected server that prompted an aborted FBI probe and that many of her supporters blame for her ultimate defeat in the 2016 presidential election. That’s because she had an estimated 30,000 e-mails destroyed before the FBI could get to them and Wiki-Leaks could subsequently hack and release them. How many were between Edgar Bronfman and herself? And, what exactly was discussed? We’ll probably never know for sure. However, the fact that Edgar Bronfman was the head of the Jewish World Congress certainly bespeaks to high level political connections regarding Israel that almost always gets what it wants from the US government, especially those in the State Department.

One of the mainstays of political corruption has always been the “honey trap”, wherein a promising politician is lured into a compromising position by prostitutes, mind-controlled sex slaves, and/or minors as a form of entrapment and blackmail. And, as I documented in a previous article on Para-Political Journal, this was done routinely by known pedophile Jeffrey Epstein using his own underage girl recruiter into his extensive harem that are then trafficked to wealthy and powerful men like Hollywood director Brian Singer and of course Bill Clinton, who was a frequent flier of the “Lolita Express” jet Epstein operated and a guest at his palatial estate. Now, Bill Clinton obviously didn’t need any prodding to jump at the opportunity that he had long taken advantage of previously many times, including known instances of the rape of women like Juanita Brodderick and Kathleen Wiley. However, anything done at Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion would have been video recorded and very likely sent directly to Israeli Mossad for safekeeping and easily used as political blackmail should he ever decide to go against their interests on key policy decisions.

It’s also safe to at least assume that Edgar Bronfman Sr., who sat next to Hillary Clinton during his 75th birthday and had amassed an immense fortune from the Seagram’s Company that is alleged to have ties to the mafia, was not only connected politically to Washington but particularly and especially to the Jewish elite domestically and abroad. In that respect, his personal e-mails to heads of state (including Hillary Clinton), powerful business leaders, and personal acquaintances would have made for some interesting insights for a sex trafficking cult like NXIVM, who could certainly use that information for their own financial blackmail purposes as Israeli Mossad already were using it for political purposes.

Proof of just how sick and twisted Raniere’s NXIVM actually was comes from former members of his inner circle talking about being “branded” (the flesh of their upper thigh being cauterized in other words) with the initials “KR” and “AM”, referring to Keith Raniere and Allison Mack respectively. The idea of “branding” these girls can be seen as part of a traumatic physical and psychological mind-control tactic to enhance and enforce these girls’ sex slave attachment to Raniere as his personal property the way, for instance, a rancher brands his cattle or in this case a master brands his slaves. Those familiar with what’s known as “trauma-based mind control” will see how tactics such as this can also cause the mind of an individual to “split” into alters or what is clinically referred to as “Dissociative Identity Disorder” (DID), wherein multiple personalities are created within a person that can then be programmed for various purposes including the “Sex Slave” alter. Therefore, while it’s unknown at this time the extent to which NXIVM was employing “branding” specifically for this function, it’s certainly well within the realm of possibility that this was the case given what we know about “trauma-based mind control” going all the way back to the MK-ULTRA days of the 1950’s and 60’s.

The use of various cults like NXIVM being used by the CIA as fronts for mind-control techniques is also nothing new, as we’ve seen with articles documenting just such known connections with cults like the one Jim Jones ran in Guyana prior to its elimination. Hopefully, a lot more information will come out at the trial as Keith Raniere is extradited back to New York, and witnesses start coming forward as to the wider dark web of his operations with people and organizations that we may find are deeper than we previously imagined. High level cases involving mind-control and/or sex trafficking, however, have a way of “resolving” themselves quickly and quietly with damage control falling on “convenient scapegoats” so that the real puppet masters can maintain “plausible deniability”. And, if that doesn’t work, they can always slap a case with a state’s secrecy act due to “National Security” (which is another way of saving them from embarrassing revelations). This essentially puts the entire case under a “Sealed Indictment”, where you won’t even be allowed to read the transcripts of the trial. So, let’s hope that doesn’t happen here, but (if it does) don’t say I didn’t warn you.

 


What’s Wrong with the Kids Today? (A Study in the Social Engineering of America’s Youth)

I’ve reached an age now, unfortunately, where I’m completely “out of step” with the entire current and flow of the times. And, when I say everything, I mean the values, the culture, the ideologies, the attitudes, the music, the priorities, and pretty much everything else that defines modernity, which is (to my mind) more and more resembling some kind of hybrid Frankenstein-like monstrosity cross between George Orwell’s 1984, Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, and Mike Judge’s prescient movie “Idiocracy”. One of the central arguments to my overriding critique is that, beginning with the Millennial Generation and moving forward to their “born digital” children, this country has been systemically transformed into nation of entitled, politically-correct, hyper-sensitive, pussies, and wussies, who due to an extended (and some would argue never ending) childhood along with a heavy dose of social engineering is ushering in the transformation of society into the hands of the Trans-humanist Agenda.

Brave New World by Aldous Huxley

The philosophy of trans-humanism is based on the insidious assumption that humans should and must merge with the machines of their making becoming an essentially cybernetic organism in order to transcend the limitations of their own innate biology. The confluence of technologies being heavily funded by DARPA and other invested technocrats to bring this about involve everything from nano-technology, cryogenics, genetic manipulation of DNA, robotics, cybernetics, and of course quantum computing or AI (Artificial Intelligence). Now, much of the research and development for these convergent technologies is being done at the university level prior to either being implemented within the military (where soldiers are always the guinea pigs of mad scientists along with the traditional cannon fodder of wars) or farmed out to the corporate world and into the public domain. However, in order to get the public to accept increasing levels of techno-fascist control (let alone willfully go along with such a radical transformation of our very evolution as a species), you’ve got to get the younger generations alienated from their core self, which is one of the real functions of schooling. Afterwards, they can be transformed into obedient servants of the ruling elite, mindless consumers with no moral compass, and socially collectivized through various means. And, wouldn’t you know it? This is exactly what’s been going on.

Living in the Matrix

Now, as I’ve discussed previously, the origins of this country’s decent into a collectivized, dependent, mass -society rather than one that values individual liberty, ingenuity, self-reliance, and producing its own needs for itself goes back much further in history to right after the Civil War. If you study history, you’ll find that it was during the period of reconstruction from about the 1870’s to the 1890’s where so many of the institutions that we now take for granted really came into being. One of those was public schooling, which prior to that period didn’t exist in the form we know it as today. And yet, most people in America were still some of the most literate and educated people in the world. However, during this time, the founders of the US system of public schooling imported an idea that had started in Prussia (what is now mostly Germany) in order to create a “dumbed down” class willing to serve a corporate financial and industrial elite, who managed to consolidate their power into monopolies and later cartels of great wealth and power. So, while there was a literal machining of America’s economic power and shift from the largely rural farming and ranching life into the factory jobs of the cities, there was also a corresponding machining of the American mind as well from one of the resourceful pioneer spirit to one adaptive to being a cog in the machine of corporate industry.

Looking for Life Except on Earth

Now, as time went on and the social engineers perfected their methods, we saw the rise of what Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book Between Two Ages called the “psycho-civilized” society when kids were given Ritalin, Adderol, and Zoloft in the 1990s. This reminds me of what Aldous Huxley was talking about in Brave New World with a drug that he called “soma”, which was administered to essentially placate any anxieties you might have about your life in a coercive micro-managed society. What had changed in the civilization that schools were now being turned into psychiatric-administered prisons? Charting the shift in focus isn’t necessarily easy to pinpoint, but a good indication as to where it took shape was around the late 1960’s and early 1970’s when you saw college campuses radicalized due to Vietnam War, Civil Rights Movement, Women’s Movement, etc. It was also around that time when the US government was experimenting on unsuspecting soldiers, students, medical patients, and others during the infamous MK-ULTRA Program, which studied the effects of various chemical, electrical, and hypnotic methods of inducing different levels of mind-control. What Timothy Leary and Ken Kesey were doing in proselytizing the use of LSD actually had an decidedly un-radical effect on generations of youth, who “dropped out, turned on, and tuned out”. After all, you can’t very well affect much radical change in the systems of power killing people in Vietnam, regimenting people’s lives in corporate offices, and subjecting black people to 2nd class citizenship if your brain is fried from taking too many hits of acid doled out by hippies acting as unpaid stooges of the CIA and FBI.

And so, the Utopian promises of the Hippies and Yippies turned into the Dystopian nightmare of the Hipsters and Yuppies, where it has remained ever since. And, yet just when you thought it couldn’t possibly get any worse than that….it has. The hedonistic drug-addled days of the cocaine and disco-fueled 70’s followed by the moronic, moralistic, and greedily ego-inflated cocaine and hair band fueled 80’s weren’t what you would call high water marks in American history, but you could have some mindless fun dancing the night away blitzed out of your mind in the never ending pursuit of trying to get laid (at least until AIDS scared the shit out of people enough to think about getting married). Now, when you look at kids in their teens or even people in their 20’s, it’s like looking into a blank cypher, not even from the drugs so much as the hypnotic trance that is induced from their cell phone fetishism.

Cell Phone Suck

They’ve also often got their ear buds in and are listening to their i-Tunes or something, which (if it was put out in the last 20 years) probably sucks. Granted, this is an opinion, but it’s also one of basic musical taste that even an 8-year-old can usually distinguish. After all, as one guy said, “the 1960’s had Jimi Hendrix, whereas we got Lenny Kravitz.” The 60’s had Janus Joplin, whereas we have Miley Cyrus. Even in the realm of Hip Hop, the 80’s had RUN-DMC, Beastie Boys, Grandmaster Flash, and Public Enemy. This generation has Lil Jon, Lil Wayne, and Lil Kim. They’ve gotten so stupid, I suppose, that they can’t even be bothered to actually spell out “Little” and therefore have to abbreviate it to “Lil” for people that can’t spell anyway. If only they had that “Lil” bit of talent it takes to actually be worth listening to, I might give a rat’s ass. Sorry, all you Millennials and younger. You clearly lose out in the cultural wars by a long shot. “So what if the music is a lot worse?”, you ask. What does that have to do with anything? Let’s just say that a big part of the social conditioning that goes on in the course of “dumbing down” a population is done in the course of their music, since this particular art form (more than any other) defines the cultural tonality and attitude of an entire generation.

Modern Education

Now, that we’re living in what the media is calling a “Post-Truth” era, is it possible to see what’s going on with college-aged kids now without falling for all the “Social Justice Warrior” bullshit that is so typical in social media these days? Perhaps it is, and if you’ve got the patience to follow my line of reasoning, I hope you show how it’s comprehensible. First, you might remember that what could have turned into a actual movement but never seemed to gain any footing outside camping outside parks, bridges, and City Halls, we can see some of what I’ve described as “collectivization” during the “Occupy Wall Street” protests. Anytime a speaker would address those assembled, everybody would repeat what the speaker said immediately after it was said. Are we to conclude that people had to repeat the words just in case they didn’t hear it the first time? And, if so, why would everybody be so hard of hearing? Or, was it more likely a way of socially indoctrinating the people into “group think”, which is to say no thinking at all? I personally lean towards the later. There’s also been heavy protests around university campuses to remove Civil War era statues, particularly if the statue in question is a Confederacy figure. After all, we can’t have these statues honoring these men as they were obviously racist and blah, blah, blah. I hate to break it to these dumb ass kids, but most everyone in the South and even in the Northern states (in spite of what you may have heard) were racist back in the Civil War days. So, about the only thing they’ll accomplish in removing these statues at public expense (mind you) is that the next time they take a history exam where they’re asked who the major Confederate General was during the Civil War, they won’t have the General Lee statue to remind them of it on their test anymore. How ridiculous has it gotten when university students are now advocating for “limiting free speech” instead of expanding it? In many ways, this is actually going in reverse to the days of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) back in the 60’s, which whatever you think think of their politics at least fought to be heard among their peers rather than censoring them. When conservative speakers like Milo Yiannopoulos and Ann Coulter aren’t even allowed to give a talk on campus grounds, what does that say about freedom to explore different ideas (no matter how you might object to them) at college? Or, what kind of climate does it foretell when college professors are essentially shouted down for what a student would call a “micro affront” or “mini aggression” to use their Newspeak.

Education as Escape From Reality

And now, you’ve got high school kids walking out of their classes (not because they’ve finally come to understand how schools are giving them a 12-year lobotomy and engaging in behavioral modification) but because they feel “unsafe” in schools. Hello, retards! I mean, mentally-disabled to be politically correct about it. You do realize that life can’t be made perfectly “safe”? In fact, you’ll find out just how “unsafe” it can be when you start driving and realize that you can’t steer a car and text with the same hand. Then, you’ll end up plowing into a retainer wall on your way to work at Burger King, which is about all your diploma will be good for when you graduate. So, here we have whole swaths of kids, who are openly attacking the 2nd Amendment based on the Parkland High School shooting in Florida instead of looking at why the FBI that were given multiple warning signs never followed up or why a deputy waited outside the building for at least 4 minutes, while the shooting was taking place instead of immediately entering the school. A similar situation was reported to have occurred at the Columbine shooting, where cops waited outside for a long enough time until there were enough killed to justify more gun control legislation that is sure to follow. All that’s needed to see how these kinds of scenarios are allowed to play out is to enact a “problem” (school shootings), get the inevitable “result” (shock and outrage), and then bring in your “solution” (more gun control and psychiatric involvement in schools), which was planned all along. Limiting the 2nd Amendment only serves to further enslave the citizenry to the totalitarian goals of an unchecked police state, whereas getting kids off of mood-altering SSRI drugs and arming certain teachers and/or security guards on a school campus would help greatly in actually doing what is necessary to solve the problem. But, to do this would counter act these students’ long-time programming leading up to what Aldous Huxley envisioned in Brave New World of a society, wherein people would actually come to love their slavery and by extension their masters. It is these masters of manipulation and social engineering, who don’t so much shoot bullets as they do situations and create the Pavlovian response conditions for an obedient, dumb, and hyper-reactionary citizenry through subtle forms of conditioning.

Aldous Huxley Quote on psycho-pharma fascism

 

 

 


Pentagon’s Previously Secret Project into the Study of UFOs is Revealed

Bigelow Aerospace

It’s a brand new year, and the Para-Political Journal is here to usher it in with an interesting Exo-Political story that has been getting a lot of positive buzz lately. I speaking of course of recent revelations as revealed in the New York Times and Politico Magazine that from 2007-2012 there was a secret government funded project called the “Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program” (AATIP) whose ostensible mission was the scientific collection and analysis of UFOs. It was created by then Senator Majority Leader, Harry Reid (Nevada-D) along with Senator Daniel Inouye (Hawaii-D) and Ted Stevens (Alaska-R) under the direction of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and allocated some $22 million, which by bloated Pentagon monetary standards is tiny. However, it’s still a substantial sum given by a government that has for the last 50 years claimed that there was nothing to the UFO phenomenon, when the Air Force closed Project Blue Book down. We’ve only learned about the project from a career intelligence officer, who worked as the lead on the project named Luis Elizondo. Much of the money for the project went to Robert Bigelow, who runs a huge private aerospace company called Bigelow Aerospace and a para-normal investigatory organization called N.I.D.S. (National Institute for Discovery Science). You might remember this later organization from its fascinating investigations into the infamous “Skinwalker Ranch”, which Las Vegas news anchor and occasional host of the popular nighttime radio show Coast to Coast AM, George Knapp, has also discussed and written about.

George Knapp News Anchor

The question is- “What exactly does this ultimately mean or signify in the realm of Ufology?” So far, at least, we don’t yet fully know the answer as the voluminous reports that were supposedly composed during the course of the project’s research haven’t yet been released to the public for scrutiny, and I’m somewhat leery that it ever fully will be quite frankly. Naturally, this would be a real shame to the potential value that this scientific data represents to the field of Ufology in perhaps learning about the phenomenon outside of the usual rumor-mongering or ridicule context in which it quite often resides. However, one shouldn’t be all that surprised if that is the fate of the final reports, since even Luis Elizondo claimed he quit due largely to the excessive secrecy that government agencies have surrounded themselves with in dealing with this issue. For any serious researcher, this is real problem that isn’t going away anytime soon and it usually takes legal action to pry information out that almost always isn’t worth the time and money necessary to do it. My personal hunch about it, as some of you may have already read about in my article on the Secret Space Program Conference, is that the real action is in the private sector. In other words, if the US has indeed recovered ET craft going at least as far back as the Roswell, New Mexico crash of 1947 and Aztec, New Mexico crash of 1948 as declassified FBI documents seem to suggest, it would be well-connected and sophisticated private corporations that would ultimately be tasked with reverse engineering the technology for covert utilization and weaponization before it eventually filtered down into the public domain on a limited basis.

Aztec UFO Crash

Certainly, whether you believe Col. Philip Corso’s thesis as described in his book “The Day After Roswell” that certain high-technologies we’re familiar with today like integrated circuit chips, night vision, and fiber optics were seeded by ET technology recovered from the Roswell crash or not, were these events to have occurred…it would be the private sector with heavy contract ties to the military that would be tasked with the R&D of these technologies as that is what they’re designed to do in the first place. Interestingly enough, Bob Bigelow is reported to have specially altered and/or expanded his storage warehouses due to his possession of certain metal alloys thought to have come from UFOs. I would agree with other commentators about this story that were this indeed the case…this would clearly be the most important evidence in confirming the existence of an extraterrestrial source for the phenomenon. Before he died back in 2014, I felt that one of the most important researchers in abduction research was Dr. Roger Leir, who I had the opportunity to meet and speak with at the Bay Area UFO Conference. At the conference, he gave an excellent presentation regarding his extensive research into strange foreign objects that he had removed from people over the years that believed they had been abducted and subsequently experimented upon. Check out the talk he gave at the International UFO Congress back in 2012. These foreign objects found in the hands, feet, and other parts of the body of abductees are usually called “alien implants” and have very anomalous characteristics as Dr. Leir soon found in his research post-surgical removal. So, for instance, these metallic implants (often as tiny as a pencil lead or BB) would be surrounded by a biological membrane in an area with significant nerve tissue, thereby overriding the body’s natural tendency to create inflammation in its rejection of a foreign object. In testing the metallurgy, he determined that they often had isotopic ratios of elements not available on this Earth and was even able to pick up certain Hertz frequencies emanating from the implant. I took copious notes during his lecture, but you can also read about it in his books on the subject such as “The Aliens and the Scalpel”. Dr. Leir was a very humble and open-hearted man, and he will definitely be very hard to replace in the study of alien implants given his tireless dedication and expertise.

Dr. Roger Leir

While some people like David Jacobs sees the abduction phenomenon as an extensive hybridization program of the “Grays”, as they’re known in the alien abduction literature, others like Steven Greer see the entire phenomenon as orchestrated by a highly secret and sophisticated government agency in order to create a climate of fear within the general population so that they can eventually simulate the conditions for a false-flag alien invasion. This scenario was supposedly told to Carol Rosin, who was a close confidant to former Nazi rocket scientist Werner von Braun. Let’s not forget that it was Nazi scientists like von Braun brought over to the US under Project Paperclip, who created the Apollo V-2 rocket program that would eventually carry US astronauts to the moon in 1969. Or, so we’re told. There’s a lot of conspiratorially-minded people out there, who question whether we ever did go to the moon. Without getting into that particular controversy too deeply at least for now, I find it interesting that what few people talk about are the reports by some of the Apollo astronauts of seeing strange UFOs in their various flights and other weird alien-like structures within our own solar system even. I personally think that whatever the astronauts saw up there spooked them plenty and may explain why NASA hasn’t gone back to the moon since 1974, assuming of course they ever did in the first place, since they found out it was already occupied and they weren’t welcome. Apparently, the Russians got the same message via various incidents in their history.

Edgar Mitchell on the Moon

Without digressing too much further, we’re still left with a rather interesting footnote in Ufology with the discovery of the government funded AATIP that initially would seem to indicate that the Pentagon views UFOs as a potential threat. Certainly, UFOs being seen flying on numerous occasions over ICBM sites would have sparked an investigation even if, as Robert Salas has pointed out, they appeared to be shutting down our nuclear weapons capacity to prevent a nuclear holocaust rather than cause one. Whenever NORAD or FAA radar picks up an unidentified blip on their screen, there is a natural tendency to be both curious and fearful, especially given how fast UFOs have been known to fly. Military jets are scrambled, but they’re clearly no match in their feeble attempts to intercept. In conjunction with the recent revelations about the AATIP, an organization set up for greater UFO disclosure called “To the Stars Academy of Arts and Sciences” founded by former Blink-182 musician Tom DeLonge also released a video shot back in 2004 off the coast of San Diego of a F/A-18 that spotted an oblong-shaped UFO. It makes me wonder- “How many more videos like this one are still being suppressed from disclosure?” Fighter pilots are sworn to secrecy and security oaths by their respective branches and rarely discuss what they’ve seen even in retirement. Even commercial pilots, who have sightings, are threatened to keep quiet by the airlines, the pilots association, and shadowy individuals of unknown intelligence origins known to debrief these pilots and scare them into perpetual silence.

Fortunately, however, more witnesses and whistle-blowers are coming out about what they’ve seen as they enter the winter of their years in many cases. One of the authors of the New York Times piece, Leslie Kean, documented some of the most important of these cases in her book given that it focused on very credible airline and fighter pilots along with witnesses as high up the military chain-of-command as General. When you add to that list esteemed members of the academic and scientific community, it becomes increasingly difficult to dismiss the entire phenomenon as a misidentification of the planet Venus or flocks of birds as various debunkers have tried to do over the years. So, does this revelation of a government funded project to research and analyze the threat assessment posed by UFOs constitute “disclosure”? Not really. But, it certainly constitutes a kind of “confirmation” that there is still an interest (despite the denials) of this particular phenomenon within the Congress, unacknowledged intelligence community, and certain members in the Pentagon given that, while the funding dried up for the project in 2012, the research and analysis is on-going according to Luis Elizondo who’s gone on to join DeLonge’s circle at “To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science”.

Grey Alien Face

 


What Really Happened in the Las Vegas Shooting?

Running in Las Vegas

With Halloween already upon us, it has been a month now since the deadliest mass shooting incident in US history (we’re told killing some 58 and injuring 546 people) that took place October 1st in Las Vegas, Nevada. And yet, in spite of all that elapsed time, the “official narrative” of what happened makes virtually no plausible sense whatsoever. Also, though no surprise to me, it’s still no less disheartening to realize that the mainstream media has once again failed miserably to illuminate that day’s events with any real investigation into why a well-to-do real estate mogul with no previous history of criminal activity would decide one day to kill a bunch of people at an outdoor country western music festival called Route 91 Harvest Music Fest from the 32nd story of his room inside the Mandalay Casino Hotel. The notion that he simply “snapped” due to debts he had accrued from playing video slot machines or whatever else the media has been trying to push as a possible motive comes across as utter nonsense. Therefore, it is up to the fiercely independent media of on-line investigators, like myself. to try to make sense out of the Las Vegas mass shooting, since we’re simply never going to get the larger story from either the mainstream media or the FBI.

First, let’s begin with the man they claim was responsible…Stephen Paddock. Just who the hell is this guy? No matter what source you look at including the New York Times, absolutely nothing would indicate that Stephen Paddock fits the profile of a “lone nut” that would commit these crimes. He is described as a wealthy real estate mogul, who owns multiple homes around the world, and likes to gamble when he is in Las Vegas, which is at least once a month. His brother, Eric Paddock, listed his home address as Mesquite, Nevada, but there are various reports of him moving around a lot from house to house often looking for places that are quiet and secluded from public scrutiny. Naturally, people would become curious as to just what kinds of activities Paddock was involved in that might necessitate these kinds of measures (which I’ll get to in a moment), but there is certainly no indication that he was violent in any way.

Stephen Paddock Face

Where it gets interesting is when we learn that Steven Paddock used to work for either a government entity or a government-affiliated company. So, for instance, he worked for the US Postal Service as well as an auditor for the IRS. He also worked for a company called Morton-Thiokol, which was the company that designed the infamous O-Rings that failed leading to the Challenger Shuttle explosion. According to investigators into the 1986 Challenger Shuttle catastrophe, scientists within Morton-Thiokol tried to warn NASA about the high probability of failure of their O-Rings within the rocket boosters in cold weather, but NASA refused to postpone the launch with obviously disastrous results. It’s also been reported that Paddock used to work for the giant aerospace corporation, Lockheed Martin. A recent CIA whistle-blower into the Deep State and the Secret Government, Kevin Shipp, said that Lockheed Martin is so large and powerful that it is like a separate state within a state. So far, all we’ve proved is that Stephen Paddock held some pretty high positions within some pretty powerful corporations that, in the case of Lockheed Martin in particular, have very deep connections with US intelligence. I maintain that, if there was a proper investigation done into Paddock’s job history, these kinds of connections would have definitely put him “on the radar” so-to-speak of these same intelligence agencies for use as either a sheep-dipped undercover operative or an informant asset.

In regards to Paddock working as an intelligence agent or asset of some kind, one of the darker theories is that he was involved in a child trafficking ring using his own 2004 created Domestic LLC called Paradise Ranch 21, which although incorporated in the State of Nevada had a base of operations in the Philippines. We do know that Stephen Paddock had a pilot’s license along with multiple planes that he stored in hangers like the one in Henderson, NV and that he had visited the Philippines many times with his girlfriend, Ms. Marilou Delaney, who investigators initially named as “a person of interest” and later flew back to the US for questioning. She was in the Philippines when the shooting occurred. It’s fairly well known that the Philippines is a popular destination for “sex tourism” and “child trafficking” for that purpose. This begs the question- “Was Paddock’s company Paradise Ranch 21 being used as front for the trafficking of children including a brothel in the Philippines that he owned?” And, if indeed this is the case, what role did this have to play, if any, in the Las Vegas Shooting?

Paradise Ranch Entrance

We might also ask, “What other clues there are that would suggest Paddock wasn’t working alone?” Well, for one thing, how else could you explain how multiple bags of luggage filled with guns and ammunition were able to be hauled up to his room without triggering the curiosity of Mandalay Bay’s security and surveillance system? After all, we all know by now that casinos like Mandalay Bay have thousands of cameras everywhere in the hotel, as many as 3,000 cameras by some estimates just in that hotel/casino alone, and yet we haven’t seen any raw footage released of Steven Paddock outside or inside the hotel. Why not? Also, according to Steve Wynn (Chairman and CEO of Wynn Resorts) who owns several hotel/casinos, nobody (presumably Paddock included) would normally have access to a service elevator at the hotel unless accompanied by security personnel. So, if Stephen Paddock was able to haul up so many bags filled with guns and ammo to his 32nd story room without attracting suspicion because he was using the “service elevator” of the hotel, who gave him access to this elevator and why? There are also witnesses that claim someone else was using the electronic key to the room where Paddock was claimed to be staying and bringing up several bags. Who was this person and what was their role in the shooting that occurred?

Steve Wynn

Looking at the room service receipt, it’s clear to me that there were at least two people in the room ordering food, and yet there doesn’t seem to be any interest into trying to find out just who this second person was, let alone why they were there in the first place. What’s also pretty clear to me, when you look at just how stressed out and anxious Sheriff Joseph Lombardo is during press conferences, is that the Las Vegas Police Department isn’t being allowed to conduct a proper investigation into what happened that day, since the FBI is running the show…i.e. cover-up. And yet, Sheriff Lombardo still let it slip that Stephen Paddock must have had help to pull it all off, which naturally implies a wider conspiracy afoot. The more you investigate the Las Vegas Shooting, the more it appears that Stephen Paddock was likely working as an intelligence asset on behalf of the ATF and/or FBI to run guns to individual(s) unknown as part of an entrapment scheme or even perhaps as part of an arms deal gone bad. I’ll leave it to you to decide which side of the fence you want to place this operation in, since we’ll probably never have all the facts as to what really took place. However, there is certainly ample precedent with the FBI’s notorious “Fast and Furious” program that funneled heavy weaponry into the hands of known Mexican drug cartels. We’re told that it was part of an investigation to find out where they ended up, but through a Congressional inquiry into the operation…this has proved to be a farce. Well, we know where they ended up! What we don’t know is why the DEA, ATF, and FBI needed to run guns to the Mexican cartels in the first place, particularly when you consider that no major arrests were made after the fact, and they’ve continued to stonewall investigations ever since.

Las Vegas Sheriff

So, if indeed Stephen Paddock was acting as a go-between front man in an arms deal being run by the FBI, then, of course, the FBI certainly wouldn’t want the public to know anything about their involvement in the operation after it blew up in their face. And, no matter what his involvement may ultimately have been, it would be much easier for the ATF/FBI’s image if Stephen Paddock is the dead “fall guy” for the entire thing and not reveal that there were a number of different shooters seen and heard that day, who might have realized that Paddock was working as an informant and decided then and there to take their bloody revenge on innocent bystanders, not to mention Paddock himself. After all, admitting that there were multiple shooters would blow what’s left of the official narrative right out of the water, and yet this is exactly what several witnesses claim they heard and saw that night, including video from a cab driver indicating shots being fired from the 4th floor of the Mandalay Bay as well from a different trajectory.

One on-line investigator makes a very cogent case that Paddock’s strange movements in flying out to Phoenix, where the ATF has a major base of operations, and driving back into Las Vegas is indicative of a gun-running operation being run by ATF and/or FBI. If Paddock was operating as the front man for these buy operations, it would make complete logical sense to do them inside a Las Vegas Casino Hotel, where any dirty money being transacted could be easily laundered through the casino poker chips and once exchanged after playing a few hands of Blackjack come out clean. Interestingly enough, there’s even reason to believe that the CEO of MGM Resorts International, James Murren, that also owns Mandalay Bay knew this was going on and had reason to believe that it was going to backfire soon, when you consider how much stock in MGM Resorts International he sold in the weeks prior to the Las Vegas Shooting. What did this guy know at the time that the rest of us didn’t? This is yet another possible avenue of inquiry in attempting to discover just who the real gun buyers, and hence likely culprits of the violence that erupted that day, were, especially when you consider how much money the Saudis have invested in Las Vegas casinos like the MGM Grand, Luxor, Tropicana, Bellagio, and Mandalay Bay.

Mandalay Bay Hotel and Casino

Another big tip off that this entire “investigation” is merely window dressing for the FBI stage managing a massive cover-up in order to cover their ass is the strange case of the so-called Mandalay Bay security officer, Jesus Campos. If you remember correctly, authorities initially claimed that security guard Campos was shot right around 9:59 p.m., as he approached Paddock’s door right as the first shots were being fired. Later, this was changed to Campos being shot later at around 10:07 p.m., since he claimed that he was unable to breach a barricaded door until then. What I find even more curious than the changing time-line of Jesus Campos is why Stephen Paddock only fired for 10 minutes sometime shortly after 10 p.m., but LVPD SWAT wasn’t able to breach his suite until 11:20 p.m. that night! However, right around the time when reporters were trying to put Jesus Campos on every national TV news program in the country to get the full story as to what happened, Campos disappeared from public view. Then, inexplicably, when he came back into public view…he gave what would be his one and only interview with longtime celebrity sycophant talk show host, Ellen DeGeneres, who unsurprisingly simply praised him as a hero. She also failed to ask the hard questions as to the ever changing time-line of that night or why he fled to Mexico instead of a hospital after he was supposedly shot in the leg only to return to the US a week later. Given that Ellen has paid endorsement deals with MGM Resorts International Inc., the parent company of Mandalay Bay, it would appear, on the surface, that the casino (in addition to the FBI and ATF) is also trying to cover their asses in making sure that they aren’t held financially liable for the dead and injured for their role in this major massacre.

Jesus Campos on Ellen

Granted, I certainly don’t claim to have all the answers or even most of them. But, what I do have (that most of the mainstream media apparently do not with any real conviction) are important questions that have not been answered with any degree of satisfaction as to what really occurred in Las Vegas on the night of October 1st, 2017. Therefore, what I’ve tried to show in this article is that the official narrative as to what happened that night simply doesn’t add up in any way, shape, or form and that an alternative scenario (such as an ATF/FBI gunrunning entrapment scheme gone bad) is therefore necessary. Naturally, you’re free to choose whatever scenario that makes the most sense to you, as nothing is nailed down for sure in this highly strange case of continually changing and competing narratives. From what I’ve been hearing, there are at least 5 major alternative theories as to what happened thus far, and I wouldn’t be surprised if this number continues to grow, as is usually the case when so many pressing questions continue to persist without any reasonable answers from officialdom.


Was Princess Diana’s Death an Accident or Assassination?

People's Princess

This country celebrated a rare solar eclipse on August 21st, 2017, and especially in a line moving midday from Oregon to South Carolina in what is known as the “path of totality” the sun is (for a few minutes at least) completely obscured by the moon. However, 20 years ago, a different bright and shining light was not only veiled in temporary shadow but completely snuffed out forever. I’m speaking, of course, of the Princess of Wales, Diana, who died in Paris on August 31st, 1997 after a horrific car crash. Unfortunately, after one French inquest and three more British inquests, there are still serious questions that remain in any serious researcher’s mind about what really happened that fateful night. And, when these questions aren’t satisfactorily answered by these “official” inquests and investigations and/or not made available to the public, then we turn to see whether there was in fact a conspiracy to kill Diana and start asking things like, “Who had the means, motive, and opportunity to assassinate Diana and why would she have been targeted?” I don’t presume to know all or even most of the answers, and (even if I did) this case is far too complex and large in scope to encapsulate it in a small article. To really understand the ins and outs takes years of study and research that would presumably be laid out in a book or series of books. This was done in a series of nine books by New Zealand researcher, John Morgan. But, we can at least ask a few questions that don’t add up and look at where they might lead should we follow up.

Most mainstream media accounts, including all the TV specials running lately on Diana, would have us believe that Dodi al Fayed’s personal driver, Henri Paul, was drunk when he left the Ritz Carlton to go to Dodi’s apartment with Diana. However, this scenario is seriously flawed in my view. Why? First, take a look at the video of Henri Paul shortly before the entourage left the Ritz Hotel. He doesn’t look the least bit drunk. If his BAC (Blood Alcohol Content) was really as high as over three times the French legal limit the coroner said it was not to mention the very high level of carbon monoxide found in his blood, he would have had a hard time even walking upright let alone be able to drive a car. And, were he really that drunk, is it plausible to think that Dodi al Fayed, Diana, and Dodi’s bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones, who was the only surviver in the car that night, would have all allowed Henri Paul to drive them that night? It simply makes no sense whatsoever, and gives Dodi’s father Mohamed al Fayed justification in questioning whether the blood that was tested by a British pathologist was really that of Henri Paul to begin with or whether it was switched out with someone else.

Diana and Entourage at the Ritz Carlton

Now, we know from the official story that once everyone had decided to leave out the back entrance to try to avoid the paparazzi camped out front to snap a picture of Diana and Dodi together, there were at least a few savvy photographers that saw through the ruse of parking the bait car in the front while exiting out the rear. It was supposedly these paparazzi that gave chase on motorcycle that were blamed for the high speed chase down the Place de Concorde and through the Pont d’Alma tunnel, which led to the Mercedes losing control near the entrance and plowing into the 13th pillar. This is where the story gets very dicey in terms of knowing exactly what happened right before the moment of impact precisely because there is evidence of a massive cover-up by the French police and later by the British investigators like Scotland Yard in order to make sure that the public never learns the truth. So, while we know that Henri Paul was taking a circuitous route back to his apartment rather than the quickest route (we’re told) in order to confuse and lose whatever paparazzi that might still be following them, we’ll never know how the Mercedes came to smash into the 13th pillar inside the Pont d’Alma tunnel given that all 17 CCTV security cameras leading towards the tunnel went suspiciously “off line” right before the crash occurred or so we’re told by French authorities. Needless to say, this seems so utterly beyond any coincidence as to make me conclude that the French were, at minimum, co-conspirators in Diana’s death.

Final Journey of Diana

Also, after 2 years of a massive French inquest into the crash producing some 6,000 pages of the French Public Prosecutor’s investigation, nobody outside the top brass of the French police and Department of Justice are allowed to look at the report. Even the “Executive Summary” of the report fails to answer some basic questions and must therefore be seen in the same light as previous investigations we’re all familiar with in this country like the Warren Commission Report and the 9/11 Commission Report, which were both huge whitewashes. This begs the question, “What exactly are the French hiding?” Well, for one thing, Mohamed al Fayed was able to determine that the NSA had been monitoring Diana and is holding onto to more than 1,000 still classified documents about Princess Diana. However, the French Public Prosecutor made no attempt to discover what the NSA knew and when they knew it. And, nowhere in the 6,000 pages of the French investigation did they attempt to explain how Henri Paul (whose personal salary was £20,000) manage to have 1.2 million francs in 13 different bank accounts or where exactly the money had come from. This could be explained, however, had Henri Paul been working in part with French and British intelligence as some researchers have claimed. And finally, the French police also failed to question several witnesses that could have provided key testimony of those crucial few minutes right before the crash.

Another tract of the investigation that ought to be taken into Diana’s death was a) Why would she have been targeted to be killed? and (if she was instead of it merely being an accident) b) Who are the likely culprits of such a high level hit? Answering the first question gets us a long way toward answering the second, in my humble estimation. While Diana’s marriage to Prince Charles in 1981 was billed as the “Wedding of the Century”, her separation from Charles 15 years later was, like most divorces, bitter, sad, and emotionally devastating for those involved. Royal insiders, however, will tell you that it was no secret that Prince Charles was never really in love with Diana but simply needed to get married and have children to fulfill what can be understood as a bloodline oath to the Crown. In other words, the British Monarchy sees it as part of your “royal duty” to father an heir to the Crown in order to continue the Windsor bloodline, which if you listen to David Icke isn’t even entirely human. And while it isn’t necessary to go there, you can’t help but wonder if there isn’t some truth to the Queen’s reptilian heritage in how she reacted to the sudden shocking death of Diana waiting a full five days before she even addressed the nation in her usual cold manner. It was left to then British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, to address the British people pouring their hearts out at Kensington Palace, while the Royals were sequestered in their summer palace ostensibly to protect the children. Yeah right!

Charles and Diana Schism

When Diana gave birth to Prince William (heir to the throne) and later Harry (who might not even be Charles’ son at all), she was no longer useful to the Royal Family as a breeder for the Windsor bloodline. But, when she officially separated from Prince Charles so that he could be with Camilla Parker-Bowles (whom he later did in fact marry), and she could date whomever she wanted to, I believe she was considered to be expendable at that point. The final straw very likely came when she began seriously seeing Dodi al Fayed, an Egyptian Muslim, and then gasp was very likely going to be engaged to marry Dodi, since there is evidence that he had bought her an engagement ring in Paris at a high-end jewelry store and was going to propose to her that weekend. Can you imagine how profoundly incensed the Royals would have been at the prospect of Diana, still beloved the world over and considered the “People’s Princess” a symbol of British Anglophile supremacy, married to an Arab, who would become the stepfather of the heir to the British throne?!

Let’s also not forget that Princess Diana was a powerful force for change in her own right and was instrumental in shining her light into some very dark corners of the world such as the Bosnian war, where she successfully lobbied for a global ban on land mines. According to one woman who worked as an MI-5 agent, she was even talking about taking on the plight of the Palestinians and their bid for statehood. Had she pushed for this, as she had the land mine issue before the U.N., I have no doubt that Israeli Mossad would have seen her as a national security threat and taken steps against her in a plot for her assassination. However, the evidence for this simply isn’t in yet for us to make a solid determination, but it’s interesting to consider nonetheless. Given the “knowns” of her relationship with Dodi, their likely upcoming nuptials, and her possible pregnancy or at least soon to be pregnancy with Arab Dodi al Fayed’s child, I surmise that those most likely tasked with carrying out the hit on Diana, making it look like an accident, and subsequently covering it up with the help of the French would have been British MI-6 working alongside a hit team of British SAS. And, the order would have come from either Prince Philip or Queen Elizabeth II, either of which could have reasonably given it once Diana had run afoul of Royal favor.

In fact, there is now a former MI-5 man, David Shayler, who has come out and said as much on global television. There’s even been speculation as to how it was done. Leaving out the question of just who Henri Paul and bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones were really working for within the alphabet soup of intelligence agencies that is bad enough, a man with MI-6 or SAS on a motorcycle or in a car could have drove up to either the passenger or driver’s side window and flashed an intensely bright light into the eyes of Henri Paul as a way of temporarily blinding him just long enough for him to miss a sharp turn at Pont d’Alma tunnel entrance. We do know that in addition to this scenario described by a former MI-6 man…the Mercedes was definitely hit by a white Fiat Uno prior to hitting the pillar inside the tunnel, which was later found by detectives working for Mohamed al Fayed and therefore was very likely a part of the actual hit squad itself. The Fiat Uno was traced to a photographer by the name of James Anderson, who was known to have worked for MI-6. He was also known to have been in Paris the day of the crash and flew out the following day to Cosica. Unfortunately, we’ll never know the extent of his involvement as two years after the crash James Anderson was found dead with two gunshot wounds ruled a suicide by the police.

We’re also told in “official accounts” that when the ambulance arrived Diana was still alive in the Mercedes. The driver Henri Paul was dead, Dodi was dead, Trevor Rees-Jones was alive and survived the crash, and Princess Diana was still alive and breathing. But, we are also told that the ambulance stayed inside the tunnel for well over an hour (a full 81 minutes). When it finally left with Diana (having supposedly been worked on life support by EMS in their vehicle for over an hour) it took the ambulance about 30 more minutes just to reach the hospital driving at 12 MPH that was only a few minutes away. Shortly thereafter, she was pronounced dead. My only question is- “Why in the hell did it take them so goddamn long to get to the hospital?” Apologists for the accident theory claim that the French have a completely different way of treating patients in that they prefer to treat someone at the scene of the accident rather than rush them to the hospital. Again, even by French standards, this makes no logical sense. Any EMS personnel will tell you that when seconds can make the difference between someone living and dying, a person suffering from severe trauma and blood loss from a car crash has to get to the emergency room of a hospital as quickly as possible, since you can’t perform extensive surgery in an ambulance. So, a defibrillator can get your heart started, and the EMS people can get you on some oxygen and an I.V. to help get you breathing and hydrated. But, they’re usually just trying to stabilize you long enough so that you don’t go into shock and die of blood loss. The anesthesiologist administration of pain killers, stitches, surgery to remove any foreign objects, and blood transfusions that have to be given to replace the pints you lost in a crash of this magnitude are done inside a hospital and not in the back of an ambulance.

Crashed Mercedes from Diana Death

So, this notion that it’s done completely different in France than it’s done in the US from an emergency situation just doesn’t add up with me. It looked to me like it was being stalled intentionally, until she eventually died of blood loss. The real question given what we know about how it was stalled is- “Who gave the order to stall the ambulance reaching the hospital, and who does that person work for?” Answer that question, and you’ve practically solved the murder mystery. Perhaps, though, we can answer a different question that leads us into the cover-up a key postmortem autopsy. Tellingly, Princess Diana’s body was embalmed and no autopsy was ever performed. However, if we can show that the autopsy results of the high levels of carbon monoxide, anti-depressants, and alcohol in the blood of the driver, Henri Paul, was essentially falsified and manufactured so as to make it appear that he was completely incompetent to drive that night- then finding out who the coroner worked for would also lead us towards the culprits in the crime. And, wouldn’t you know it, all fingers point back to Buckingham Palace, when we learn that the man responsible was Dr. John Burton, who was the Royal Coroner. His role, along with the examining pathologist, in this case are key in the ensuing cover-up of Diana’s death. Furthermore, and even more damning, he called the inquests into Dodi and Diana’s deaths a “waste of time and public money.” He was later replaced by Mr. Michael Burgess.

Make no mistake about it, it is the British Aristocracy and the price of upholding their obscene opulent elitism that is the true waste of time and money. But, for a brief while, Diana’s story was one of living out the fairy tale of practically every little girl only to have reality come crashing in, in this case quite literally some 20 years ago. She was indeed loved precisely because of her compassionate humanity and ability to relate to the everyday suffering of regular people the world over. And, although her memory has not been well served by the elite powers of evil that prevent the true cause of her death from being widely known, the legacy of her inspirational life will continue to enrich those for whom she touched over her brief years on the planet.

 

 


How the Israel Lobby Controls US Foreign Policy in the Middle East

Palestinian Child Murdered by Israelis

Last night on C-SPAN 3 at 1 a.m., I saw a very little seen hour-long documentary called “The Palestinian People Do Have Rights”. It was produced by the United Nations back in 1979 and was remarkable for focusing on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from a Palestinian viewpoint, which almost never happens in the US given how entirely one-sided our media is for the State of Israel. However, this isn’t the case necessarily with the rest of the world even among some of our European allies, who have a more nuanced perspective in the Middle East. But, unfortunately for this country, the entirety of what I’ll call the “Israeli Lobby” prevents any meaningful debate from taking place not only within the insular and historically-warped perspective of MSM propaganda but also within the White House, Congress, and the bulk of US academia as well. And, it is this fact which ought to (particularly a so-called open democratic Republic as ours) spur Americans to question the legitimacy of the very involvement of any US authority figure in the Israeli occupation of Palestine.

Beyond the question of legitimacy of America’s role in mediating the conflict through the years, it behooves us to understand how and why Israel has been able to get pretty much everything they want in terms of expanding illegal settlements, billions in US foreign aid money, the wanton killing of Palestinian civilians for alleged “self-defense”, and the overall continued genocidal Apartheid occupation of a brutalized population in the prison-like ghettos of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. In other words, the situation as it exists in the occupied territories is neither good for the US or Israel. Unfortunately, the Palestinian people are prevented from achieving self-determination under a sovereign state of their own, while remaining in a constant state of anxiety and terror from Israeli air strikes in a homeland they are treated worse than diseased cattle in.

Palestinian Land Loss

A good place to start to gain some degree of political perspective as to just how powerful the Israeli Lobby actually is in this country, as well as the ways in which it exercises its considerable power within the Washington beltway and beyond is The Washington Report. This alternative media source sponsored their annual conference this year at the National Press Club on March 24th, 2017 that was well attended but of course not discussed in mainstream discourse. Speakers included such luminaries as Grant F. Smith, Prof. John Mearsheimer (who co-wrote The Israel Lobby along with Stephen Walt), Hanan Ashrawi, filmmaker Tom Hayes, former Congressmen Jim Moran (D-VA) and Nick Rahall (D-WV), and many others. I’d like to highlight some of speakers more salient points given during their respective talks, which have all been posted for free on YouTube.

First, you might be wondering- “What exactly is the Israel Lobby?” It is actually more than AIPAC. Based on the research the Grant Smith did for his book Big Israel, he says:

“I reveal a $3.7 billion nonprofit ecosystem on track to reach $6.3 billion by 2020. With 14,000 employees, 350,000 volunteers, but a paying membership of approximately 774,000, it is this nonprofit lobby along with overlapping campaign-finance infrastructure- whether it is large individual donors, stealth political action committees- that provide Israel with the US support that it would otherwise not have.”

Octopus Stranglehold of the Israel Lobby

Now, when you add to that formidable force organizations like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), B’nai B’rith, Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), think tanks like the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and American Enterprise Institute (AEI), and the many other Jewish NGO’s and Israeli-connected companies in this country especially within media empires, it becomes abundantly clear just how powerful the Israel Lobby really is and how it can wield such disproportionate influence on American foreign policy in the Middle East. And, the US taxpayer pays for it all to the tune of at least $254 billion in known foreign aid money to Israel, more than any other country in the world.

All this free foreign aid money that is sent to Israel with no strings attached along with appropriations for the latest in American technology and military weaponry not only comes at a hefty price, in terms of what it could have been spent on in this country, but it’s also a heavy price paid in the blood of the Palestinian people, which naturally greatly weakens our moral standing in the eyes of the rest of the world. In fact, in a great many quarters, Israel is seen as even more racist than Apartheid South Africa. So, for instance, as Prof. John Mearsheimer relates in his speech:

“Speaking of South Africa, there are a number of individuals who were well acquainted with the situation in that racist state before it collapsed who believe that the situation in Israel is worse. John Dugard, the eminent South African law professor, says that the crimes against the Palestinians are, to quote, ‘infinitely worse than those committed by the apartheid regime in South Africa’. He is hardly the lone voice in that regard. For anyone who doubts how bad life can be for the Palestinians living under Israeli control, one only has to consider what happened in Israel’s three major assaults against Gaza over the past decade: Operation Cast Lead, Operation Pillar of Defense, and Operation Protective Edge. Because of time constraints, I will focus exclusively on the first of those operations, Cast Lead, which took place in the weeks before President Obama was inaugurated in 2009. Israel forces killed about 1,400 Palestinians, of whom roughly 1,200 were civilians; 350 of those civilians were children. In contrast, 13 Israelis were killed. The ratio of Palestinians to Israelis killed in that operation is 108:1. That’s not a war in my lexicon- that’s a massacre. I might add that 6,300 Palestinian homes were destroyed, contributing to the 600,000 tons of rubble that littered Gaza when the shooting ended. The U.N. commissioned an investigation in the wake of that conflict which was headed by the distinguished South African jurist Richard Goldstone. The final report, sometimes referred to as the Goldstone Report, concluded that Israel had engaged in ‘a deliberately disproportionate attack designed to punish, humiliate and terrorize a civilian population.’ It went on to accuse Israel of committing war crimes and possible crimes against humanity.”

Children Victims of Operation Cast Lead

Now, ask yourself how much of this assault you even heard about on CNN, MS-NBC, FOX, ABC, CBS, etc.? I’m willing to bet that most of the news was still fawning and deifying the “Cult of Personality” portrait they had painted for Barrack Obama, which has been completely reversed for the Trump administration. Attitudes towards celebrity presidents notwithstanding, what doesn’t change between various administrations is America’s unwavering commitment to Israel’s unilateral “right of self-defense”, which is to say that it can use any excuse it wants to justify slaughtering as many Palestinians they want. And, regardless of how bad it appears before the U.N. Security Council, the US will always veto any resolution that seeks a just and equitable peace. So, even though it’s been 100 years since the Balfour Declaration, practically 70 years since the creation of the State of Israel by the U.N., and 50 years since the 6-Day War of 1967, when an American communications vessel, the U.S.S. Liberty, was deliberately attacked in international waters by Israeli aircraft fighter jets and submarines with the sick connivance of President LBJ, as I’ve written about previously. The “special relationship” with Zionist Israel remains the same no matter who becomes president or what the political makeup of Congress may be. After all, in the lead up to the 2016 election, both Hillary Clinton and Donald J. Trump both spoke in gushing and glowing terms of their commitment to Israel at the AIPAC convention, and the only question was how much more in love they were with Israel than their opponent. So, under those circumstances, does anyone seriously think that things will change with our fundamental relationship with Israel under a Trump administration? Go watch his address to AIPAC and see for yourself.

Trump Speaks at AIPAC

Obviously, this can be a very complex and hotly contested issue, especially when you start focusing on the details of such things as border security, Israeli settlements on Palestinian land, political Zionism as a form of colonialism, ethnic cleansing, and all the the other myriad issues that surround this conflict. But, when you simply focus on how and why the US has remained so steadfast over the years in complete support of Israel to the ultimate detriment of the Palestinians in brokering a lasting peace, the matter (I think) isn’t nearly as complex as it first seems. With huge resources and practically unlimited capital, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) tracks every single politician’s vote on every single bill that even remotely affects Israel and scores politicians accordingly. Those that score high get campaign money and support. Those that score low get tagged as “Anti-Semitic” by their media moles and propaganda hacks, and their political opponents suddenly find themselves much better funded than before.

AIPAC Logo

If it’s considered important enough to oust a suspected enemy of the State of Israel, orchestrated programs can involve any number of dirty tricks to include black mail, bribery, frame jobs, cyber attacks and, of course, threats to one’s character, livelihood, and even life. Again, it’s all a question of severity and how much of a threat (or rather perceived threat) someone in an established powerful position is to what Israel views as their national interests, i.e. Machiavellian dominance. You can bet that what works well for CIA goes double for Mossad. It’s not surprising, therefore, that both countries (no matter how friendly they are with one another) spy on each other all the time. But, what should be shocking, when you delve into the matter, is that the US is giving Israel something around $6 billion a year in part to do just that.

 

 


The Real Conspiracy to Kill Dr. Martin Luther King

Recently, the anniversary of the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. assassination occurred, and come 2018…it will be the 50 year anniversary of that tragic day on April 4th, 1968 when King was shot dead standing on the balcony of the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee. In spite of the “official” news account that pinned the assassination on a poor white petty criminal named James Earl Ray, the real story of how, why, and what actually occurred to America’s favorite Civil Rights leader isn’t nearly as simple as the story of a racist “lone nut” that sought to silence King’s dream forever. The real tragedy goes beyond the death of one influential man, however, and it is more than a little telling that we are as a nation still living the bitterness, resentments, and occasional violent flare ups of racial division as the events of Ferguson and others prove all too often these days as the enmity between the police and black America continues to grow with no end in sight. Therefore, I would argue that the lessons of the Civil Rights movement have yet to be fully learned on all sides of the racial divide, and there is much work to be done in order to achieve anything close to a peace that comes from true justice being served.

With that in mind, let’s explore the real conspiracy of the MLK assassination from several different angles in order to get a better grasp on this crucial period and personage in history. We can certainly demolish the myth of that day and the so-called “shooter”, James Earl Ray, as it is now clearer than ever that he was the patsy set to be the “fall guy” for the murder. Just who was James Earl Ray anyway? I recently finished reading a book called Truth at Last that was written in part by John Larry Ray, James’ brother, about the rather checkered history of the Ray family, its run-ins with the mob, and the subsequent railroading of James for the King assassination that even the surviving King family doesn’t think he committed.

Truth at Last book cover

Unfortunately, at the time, he admitted to the murder on the recommendation of his then attorney Percy Foreman, since he told his brother that he felt “boxed in”. By that, I mean that he knew the government knew of his shooting a black soldier named Washington back when he was an Army MP during WWII. At the time, it was his job to arrest soldiers for misconduct such as going AWOL, but apparently the Washington shooting that left him paralyzed for the rest of his life really haunted Ray till the day he died. The severe guilt and trauma that resulted from the Washington shooting likely targeted him as hypnosis candidate and was later exploited into what appears to be a full fledged mind-control program directed against him. There were numerous occasions when James was “experimented” upon by what he called “bug” doctors, i.e. psychiatrists of various stripes. As John Larry Ray reports in Truth at Last:

“According to George McMillan’s book, The Making of an Assassin, U.S. Army records (no longer in existence) show that the army gave James two lumbar punctures (spinal taps)- one in the spring, on March 25, shortly before or around the time his army serial number changed, and the second at about the time James claimed he was sick and missed his shift…Lumbar punctures can be used to administer drugs. Why did the army claim James was ‘drunk’ when he had just had a spinal tap? Did the first spinal procedure have anything to do with the Washington shooting?

James Earl Ray Mugshot

Lyndon Barsten [co-author of the book Truth at Last] suggested to me for the first time that the meaning of the Washington shooting might have been an early mind-control experiment- that this is what haunted James. I have seen FBI documents that show Jimmy later saw two hypnotists in LA, one of whom had been an army intelligence officer during the war. It wouldn’t be like James to tell me he saw these ‘bug’ doctors. But he did tell me that he thought the feds were messing with his mind.”

MK-Ultra Project

Even though most of the documents were ordered destroyed by Richard Helms, thousands of documents were saved from the shredder of the notorious CIA MK-ULTRA program that began shortly after the recruitment of Nazi scientists, spies, and psychiatric doctors into the US National Security State through Operation Paperclip. This is now a very well documented part of history and was even partially investigated by the US Congress in the Church Committee or House Select Committee on Assassinations that looked at the MLK and JFK assassinations. I say “partially” because the driving force behind the Senate investigations into CIA and FBI malfeasance and skulduggery, Mark Lane, quickly came to the conclusion that they weren’t going to amount to much and that the committee was hijacked shortly after it was convened.

Mark Lane, who is famous for writing the first book questioning the Warren Commission findings into the JFK assassination entitled Rush to Judgment, also co-authored a book on the MLK assassination with conspiracy-minded comic, Dick Gregory, called Code Name “Zorro”. You can hear Mark Lane and Hosea Williams, a close confidant of King’s, talking about the conspiracy to kill King on an old Morton Downey Jr. Show that relates the following story. Both Lane and Gregory met with Walter Fauntroy, who was a member of the committee, as did John Larry Ray. According to John, he “said to me many times that he knew the FBI and the CIA were behind the murder of Dr. King.” However, he was “afraid to say it publicly, but Fauntroy, like most black people, instinctively knew the truth.” Much later on, Dick Gregory would show people a video of a Rev. Samuel “Billy” Kyles speaking about his meeting with Dr. King shortly before he is murdered, who makes a Freudian slip in front of TV news cameras by admitting that he “moved out of the way so that he could have a clear shot”. This is a clear demonstration of how the FBI not only had informants but apparently co-conspirators inside of Dr. King’s organization prior to his assassination.

Code Name Zorro Book Cover

One of the programs that HSCA investigated was the FBI Cointelpro Programs orchestrated suspected communists, New Left subversives, and “black nationalists” like the Nation of Islam and the Black Panther Party. Along with more “radical” and “revolutionary” groups, however, the FBI also had King’s Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) heavily infiltrated and offices bugged. FBI Chief, J. Edgar Hoover, had a particular loathing for Dr. King and was able to convince then Attorney General, Robert Kennedy, that the SCLC had people in it that were members of the Communist Party. I’ve yet to see any evidence that King’s closest associates were communists (although it’s possible a couple might have attended a few harmless meetings). The FBI, though, didn’t so much investigate the so-called communist infiltrators as they did King himself, who J. Edgar Hoover was attempting to completely discredit in the minds of the public. At one point, the FBI even went so far as to send him a letter along with sending his wife tapes of him supposedly having an affair with another woman recommending that he commit suicide as the only “honorable” way out.

It is perhaps no small irony that RFK would also be assassinated shortly after King in another orchestrated conspiracy that involved a mind-controlled patsy named Sirhan Sirhan. But, I’ll save that story for another day. Let’s go back to Ray’s narco-hypnotic programming. James Earl Ray made several trips to Montreal, Canada in the 1960’s where he was hypnotically programmed by MK-ULTRA Dr. Ewen Cameron, who worked at Allen Memorial Hospital out of McGill University. In Truth at Last, we read how “James met CIA asset Jules Ron ‘Ricco’ Kimble. According to what Kimble told a BBC team working on a special about the King assassination in 1989, Kimble took James to an identities specialist at the Central Intelligence Agency, who gave James the cover identity of ‘Eric S. Galt’. There was a real Canadian named Eric S. Galt who had a security clearance, and that could have helped the future patsy to walk away from any sticky situations.”

Kimble is currently serving a double life sentence in Texas for murder and is a notorious racist, which is the kind of person the feds want associating with Ray even though there’s nothing in his past that indicates he was a racist despite rumors to the contrary. Anyway, according to Lyndon Barston who spoke with him by phone, “he and James were both directed to a new Holiday Inn, built for the Expo ’67″…where “an older man came out from McGill University’s Allen Memorial Institute to hypnotize” both James and Kimble. Turns out that at this same time, “Allen Memorial Institute at McGill’s housed Subproject 68 of the CIA’s notorious MK-Ultra mind control program. The agency had data from way back in 1948 that James could be controlled. They called on Allen Memorial Institute boss, Dr. Ewen Cameron, to ensure that James was indeed a proper patsy.” Continuing, he says that a FOIA “request to the CIA revealed that Cameron’s security clearance at the agency was bumped up a couple of notches as the machinery of the King murder plot began to turn. Cameron wouldn’t live more than a matter of days after James left Canada in 1967. He died of a reported heart attack up in the mountains.” It’s well known (as the HSCA showed with the poison dart gun) that the CIA is notorious for being able to kill people through chemically-induced heart attacks along with any number of methods of killing and making it appear to be “natural causes”.

Senator Frank Church

As everyone knows, Dr. King was in Memphis to support a sanitation worker’s strike, but Ray was maneuvered into the Memphis boarding house by a man that he called “Raoul” or “Raul”, who had Ray involved in a gun smuggling operation into Mexico. This was the man that was discovered to be Ray’s handler and made sure he was in place at the right time so that he could be the convenient patsy for the assassination after a rifle with Ray’s prints was thrown down at the scene, which ballistics could never match with the actual gun and caliber bullet that actually killed King. All of these inconsistencies and details would have come out had there been a trial that Ray fought for and was denied to the end of his life until William Pepper, who was James’ last attorney, and wrote three books on the MLK assassination would finally do the next best thing and have a trial in the case of The King Family et al vs. Loyd Jowers and Other Unknown Co-Conspirators in 1999. The jury would find James Earl Ray innocent of the King assassination (that was the result of a conspiracy), and the King family was so satisfied with both the trial and verdict that they even posted the entire transcript of the trial on their website. To this day, the mainstream media has completely ignored this historic and groundbreaking piece of jurisprudence history and continues to promote the lies of their typically moronic and myopic “lone nut” theories that have, by now, been resoundingly and convincingly refuted. Case closed.

Martin Luther King Legacy


How Donald Trump Can Restore the Republic in Just 5 Steps

constitution

As you’ve probably noticed by now, even though President Donald Trump has only been in office for about a month…the Neo-Liberals are still in virtual hysterics about his administration, and there appears to be something of a soft coup happening within the GOP establishment itself as his cabinet nominees face heavy opposition by both the Democrats and his own party. Of course, the mainstream media continues its own verbal assault on the airwaves of the Trump administration as people like Michael Flynn becomes the latest casualty of political warfare when he was supposedly less than forthcoming about his links with Russia while up for Secretary of National Security. So, while I’m not a huge advocate of Trump, it seems the height of absurdity to be as hyperbolically hating as the Left has been of late, particularly when you consider that he’s made a few positive moves and has barely been in office.

What kinds of people does the mainstream media (or as Donald Trump quite rightly calls them “the fake news”) go to for information about Trump and his particular brand of populist politics? One guy that I saw pop up twice in the span of a week was the Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations, Richard Haas. First, he was on the Charlie Rose Show, and then he made an appearance on Real Time with Bill Maher. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) has been the primary pool from which the State Department and White House has stacked the deck in favor of “New World Order” globalists, who have pushed for American interventionism abroad and erasure of national sovereignty at home. In tracing the lineage of the CFR, we can see that it was a US offshoot of the British Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), which itself was a branch of the British elitist Cecil Rhodes’ Round Table Group that sought, through secretive means, to usher in a one world government with Great Britain at its head. After WWII and the devastation wrought by the Nazis, Britain’s military power was no longer the dominant player in the world largely via its superior naval fleet, and the United States became the dominate military superpower that could be employed by elites in the City of London and bankers in Basel, Switzerland to do the dirty work of policing the world on behalf of the cabal.

We can guess with some fair degree of certainty that (like her husband Bill) had Hillary Clinton won the presidency, she would have stacked her cabinet positions with members of the CFR and pushed for greater military action against Russia, which could have very well spiraled out of control into a WWIII scenario. But, instead of being thankful that we dodged that horrible bullet, smug self-righteous “neo-liberals” like Bill Maher whines and screams about Trump’s insanity, as if he’s about to press the nuclear button any day now if the leader of foreign country so much as Tweets an insult about him. It’s enough to make you vomit, quite frankly, and that’s why I wanted to wanted to write an article of sanity and cautious faith about how Trump could theoretically help restore this nation’s Republic to its constitutional underpinnings and go a long way toward ending what some have referred to as the “Secret Government” that acts as a state within a state in this country. So here, in no particular order, are my prescriptions for ending our long national nightmare in unconstitutional government that has held the Republic hostage since the time of the Civil War.

1. Abolish the Federal Reserve System 

The Federal Reserve Banking System isn’t owned by the US government, i.e. it isn’t federal at all. It is actually a private banking cartel made up of 12 international banks, the predominate controlling interest of which is the Bank of England that’s controlled by the Rothschild Family, and it in turn completely controls this nation’s money and monetary policy. According to the US Constitution, only the US government has the right to issue the nation’s currency and determine the legal tender thereof. After all, the founding fathers were well aware of the economic disasters that would befall this country were that power to fall into private banker’s hands. However, as G. Edward Griffin wrote about in his magnum opus, The Creature From Jekyll Island, that is exactly what did happen when some the world’s richest industrialists and financiers like J.P. Morgan and Paul Warburg met off the coast of Georgia on a private island in complete secrecy. Within three short years of this meeting, the Col. Mandel House controlled President Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act into law while most congressmen were on their Christmas vacation break none the wiser in 1913, and the international bankers have controlled this country ever since.

colonel-edward-mandell-house

Now, instead of the US being able to print and coin its own money based on the intrinsic value of gold and silver, it must borrow fiat Federal Reserve Notes with interest that can never be paid back in full but for which the American people become perpetually indebted and in a sense feudal slaves to the same bankers, who gave them worthless pieces of paper backed by nothing but faith that it can continue to be an instrument of legal tender for all goods and services. Naturally, inflation is the byproduct of such a system, and crashes (like that of 1929) can be engineered by the Fed constriction of the money supply, which is exactly what happened.

Unfortunately, we can still see the heavy influence of Goldman Sachs even in the Trump administration, as we did in previous ones with former Goldman Sachs man, Steven Mnuchin, becoming the Secretary of the Treasury. And, we all know by now that the 2008 crash was largely the result of the toxic mortgage securities that Goldman Sachs was peddling on the global financial market as AAA rated when they were anything but. It has also come to light through the investigative work of Rolling Stone reporter, Matt Taibbi, that Goldman Sachs even made a killing “shorting” those same securities that they knew were worthless. In other words, they bet that the securities would tank, and they of course did. That along with the trillions in derivatives being traded brought the financial system to its knees, but the US government allowed themselves to be held hostage to the financial fraud and bailed out the “Too Big To Fail” banks to the tune of billions at tax payer expense, while the Fed kept interest rates extremely low and pumped 40 billion a month into bloated banks to keep them solvent.

All this is to say that Trump and the Congress with him should abolish the Federal Reserve System by revoking its charter, back the currency with gold and silver again, wipe out all debts to the parasitic bankers destroying peoples’ lives through predatory lending practices and negative amortization interest rates, and throw the white collar criminals that wreck financial havoc in the world in prison the way that Iceland did. Then, the American people should move back to small local branch banks that stay out of Wall Street casino-like schemes and Credit Unions that offer low interest loans to small businesses, which is ostensibly what the middle of America that voted for Trump need more than just about anything…(i.e. access to capital).

2.  Eliminate the War on Drugs

Despite the near constant propaganda that we’re fed from early primary school onward, the so-called “War on Drugs” is really just a “War on People”, particularly people of color who are trying to escape their miserable lives by getting high. And while I fully recognize that this form of escapism only leads to greater addiction, social problems, job instability, and health issues- it is merely symptomatic of the much greater societal ills plaguing impoverished communities that would largely go away were they to be addressed properly. People can become addicted to damn near anything, if they’re in enough pain and are psychologically predisposed to substance abuse. So, for instance, we’ve seen plenty of examples of people that are addicted to food, porn, shopping, television, etc. And yet, you don’t see the criminalization of people, who are addicted to maxing out their husband’s credit card on the Home Shopping Network while they scarf down boxes of powered donuts and smoke packs of Newport cigarettes even though these things are far worse health wise than doing a couple of weed bong hits.

Besides, if the government really cared about peoples’ health, it wouldn’t be dropping depleted uranium bombs, spraying chemtrails that contain toxic substances, injecting its own soldiers with vaccines that contain toxic adjuncts, allowing Aspartame, MSG, GMOs, Nitrites, etc. into the food supply and so on. Obviously, illicit drug use is a health problem, but the “War on Drugs” treats it as a criminal offense by locking people up in prison for draconian sentences that ruin their lives even worse than before. Think about this for a minute. The US makes up only 5% of the world’s population, and yet it locks far more people than any other country (many of whom we would consider to be totalitarian). There are some 2.2 million people incarcerated in this country, and about 70% are there for non-violent offenses such as mere possession of a Schedule I narcotic like cocaine, heroin, PCP, and even marijuana.

Alcohol Prohibition should have taught this country a very valuable lesson when it comes to the criminalization of any drugs and the realization that people won’t stop using a substance just because the government deems it immoral. There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that drug criminalization is used to target disenfranchised minority populations in this country, particularly black people, as a means to neutralize their ability to organize and prosper on the one hand and funnel them into a for profit prison-industrial-slave-system on the other. You can learn a lot more about how this is done even in the music industry by reading John Potash’s excellent book Drugs as Weapons Used Against Us. The British targeted Chinese wealth by addicting them to opium and the CIA did the same thing in the 1960’s to the counterculture movement using LSD in order to neutralize and finally criminalize the hippies and various musical icons of the era that burned themselves out and died prematurely. The Black Panther Party were hit especially hard during that time with the FBI Cointelpro Program to eliminate their efforts of creating self-sustainable communities within black neighborhoods and turn them into dependent wards of the state, which is largely what happened.

afro-american-solidarity

The strategy therefore was to dope them into utter poverty, stupidity, and dependency on the one hand and then criminalize them for becoming addicted to drugs on the other hand that were intentionally introduced into the communities for the purposes of neutralizing a potential threat of their radicalization to the status quo of the powers that be. Unfortunately, I don’t see Trump tackling this one any time soon. He has made some strong comments very much in favor of strong “law and order” policing, after the rioting that erupted on the streets of Ferguson and elsewhere, and the GOP is known to be strict when it comes to enforcing the absurd drug laws. However, Trump is likely smart enough to recognize a losing proposition when he sees one from the standpoint of the business term, “Return on Investment” (ROI). And, by any calculus, the bogus “War on Drugs” has been an abysmal failure in that regard. Meanwhile, states like Colorado and Washington are proving what a boon that marijuana legalization can have on their local economies, since these marijuana dispensaries create good paying jobs in a huge emerging market, help alleviate suffering among people with various medical conditions, and allow for greater taxation to support local infrastructure and services. In other words, it’s a win-win for everyone involved, except those handful of corrupt people like the drug cartels and private prison system administrators that profit from its criminalization. In the case of legalized pharmaceuticals that kill far more people every year than illicit drugs to the tune of about 100,000 per year, the hypocrisy of the “Drug War” is glaringly obvious as well, and I think Trump knows it. He recently appointed longtime vaccine critic, Robert Kennedy Jr., as the lead investigator of a committee investigating vaccine safety issues having met with Dr. Andrew Wakefield and others who seriously studied the dangerous links between the MMR vaccine and the huge rise in childhood autism rates. This, at least, is a very positive sign.

3. Completely Dismantle the CIA

A goodly portion of why #2 is as big of problem as it is can be directly attributed to the CIA, which is by far the world’s largest narcotics trafficker in the world. There is voluminous evidence of this from many whistle-blowers in the know, many of whom were former CIA and DEA agents themselves. So, for instance, during the Vietnam War (itself an Agency counterinsurgency war) the CIA ran their own proprietary planes called Air America with opium that was produced in the Golden Triangle area of Southeast Asia between Burma, Cambodia, and Laos. Even the bodies of returning dead US soldiers were reported to have played a part in the operation of heroin trafficking, when certain body bags were designated and filled with heroin loaded onto C-130 cargo planes bound for the US. Returning vets from Vietnam were often already addicted to heroin, and it became a scourge for much of the 1970s.

In the 1980’s, while the CIA was training Central and South American dictators in the finer points of torture at the School of the Americas that would create many of the death squads that plagued El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Columbia among others, the CIA-trained Contras were fighting the Marxist Sandinistas with weapons given to them by the CIA. During the Iran-Contra era, arms were being flown into Central America via Panama and cocaine flown out into the US by CIA contract pilots like Barry Seal. However, narcotics trafficking is just one of the ways the agency raises black money to fight its dirty wars and undermine democratically elected officials abroad for reasons that are largely to do with keeping them tied to the hip with certain US multinational corporations and in fealty to so-called US geopolitical interests.

operation-mockingbird-programming-on-tv

As Douglas Valentine recently stated in a new book that he wrote about the agency, “The CIA is not primarily an information collection agency but is rather primarily engaged in covert action.” What is meant by the term, covert action? It means things like training foreign mercenaries, undermining elections, orchestrating coup d’etats, industrial and/or corporate sabotage, and assassination of foreign leaders. In addition to these dubious acts that aren’t necessarily in our best interests, the CIA finds time to conduct mind-control experiments on US citizens such as during MK-ULTRA, infiltrate most of the major media via Operation Mockingbird, and recruit former Nazis into its inner most ranks during the Allen Dulles initiated Operation Paperclip. And, we also shouldn’t forget that it was John F. Kennedy who attempted to “smash the CIA into a thousand pieces” and scatter it to the winds that likely was the final straw that got JFK killed by hit men either a part of the agency or recruited directly by them. However, Allen Dulles’ appointment to the Warren Commission assured that the truth about CIA involvement in the JFK assassination would never be revealed, and those that did know too much, like the late Dorothy Kilgallen, were eliminated from digging any further.

Much has been made about how the CIA doesn’t trust Donald Trump with presidential national security briefings, but I think Trump is at least savvy enough to recognize how these daily reports can be manipulated and cooked however they want to get a desired result and action. Having witnessed the bogus assumptions of Iraq having WMD’s from a distance, Trump is no doubt leery of their accuracy now that the intelligence agencies have decided to target Vladamir Putin’s Russia. The CIA represents nothing less than a rogue criminal and very dangerous fascist-oriented company, who operate in utter secrecy on behalf of a handful of elite business, political, financial, and criminal interests that runs counter to everything a free and sovereign Republic stands for. Philosophically, it is a Machiavellian death cult aligned with Nazis and members of Skull and Bones with more blood on its hands than it can ever hope to atone for and works against our true national security interests, since it is impervious to accountability and executive control. For these reasons and a whole lot more, the CIA should be completely dismantled in favor of a genuine intelligence gathering agency with executive, judicial, and congressional oversight, which could be decided upon after a lengthy moratorium and “Truth and Reconciliation” commission deliberated so as to prevent it from ever happening again. Were Trump to ever be as bold, brazen, and brave as to break apart the CIA, though, I would first recommend him as a national hero and then recommend he beef up his security detail.

4. Cut All Ties to the Saudis and the State of Israel

George Washington once admonished this newly formed country to trade with all but have foreign entanglements with none. Unfortunately, the US trades with some (and yet maintains a huge trade deficit as cheap Chinese goods flood into the country but few US manufactured goods flow the other way) and remains heavily entangled in foreign conflicts abroad. And yet, of all the foreign entanglements that the US has, none has been more disastrous for this nation than its undying allegiance to the prospering of the State of Israel. Much of our current problems in the Middle East would resolve themselves if we were to do two crucial things.

We should first eliminate our dependency on Saudi oil. The Saudis are of course Sunni Muslim, and they are also the primary funders for the most radical fundamentalist brand of Islam known as Wahabism, which is fueling groups like Al-Nusra, Al-Qaeda, and ISIS. However, we claim that these are enemy terrorist groups that need to be wiped out. So, much of the money that goes to buy weapons and fund radical Islamic groups intent on Western destruction comes from Saudi Arabia and the billionaire Sheiks that rule that country like their own brutal fiefdom, and yet the US continues to protect and shield them from prosecution for crimes against humanity because they have the largest known oil reserves in the world. The US oil companies have found many untapped oil reserves in Alaska and the northern shelf including in things like shale rock, but they can’t tap them. Of course, I’m of the belief that we could completely switch over to renewable and even free energy sources were the oil industry and their likely CIA counterparts to take their boots off the necks of various inventors, but the point is (regardless of whether you believe in these alternative technologies or only in traditional forms)…there’s absolutely no reason we should be beholden to OPEC and Saudi oil.

And yet, as bad as that is, the Israelis are controlling the US even more horribly from the inside. Israel continues to build illegal settlements in the West Bank, bulldoze Palestinian houses, erect huge concrete razer wire walls, kill innocent men, women, and children in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, and conduct major espionage operations within the US that steal classified information from our major intelligence agencies all without penalty whatsoever. Far from being lone operators like Jonathon Pollard, there are massive spy rings like the one the DEA discovered in the lead up to 9/11 that I discussed in a previous article. The Israeli spy ring made up what were likely Israeli Mossad agents posing as art students and were seen infiltrating major military installations around Washington D.C. and other government facilities of strategic interest. Some were even found to be watching the Twin Towers collapse and cheering along with filming the event. And yet, the FBI grilled some of the more suspicious members and then let them go. Why? I maintain that they likely had diplomatic immunity from prosecution due to the very “special” relationship that the US has had with Israel, since its founding. And, it is widely known that Mossad and CIA work together on operations all the time, the inside job of 9/11 being the most notorious one to date but by no means exclusive of their longtime cooperation with one another.

israeli-control-of-america

As the late former Rep. James Trafficant revealed several times to no avail, the Israeli Lobby on the Hill known as AIPAC exercises near total control over the US Congress when it comes to every piece of legislation that is passed which concerns Israel. Congressmen and women that proffer their undying loyalty to Israel through word and deed are rewarded with heavy campaign contributions and media praise, while those that utter the slightest criticism usually suffer a combination of heavy character assassination and defeat at the polls in the next election cycle. Virtually everybody is so afraid of being labeled an anti-Semite that they don’t dare question the legitimacy of Israel’s bloody crimes against the Palestinian people, whose land they stole and lives they continue to destroy in their utterly racist Apartheid country.

So, when we learn of how the US gives Israel some $40 Billion a year in foreign aid money plus many millions worth in the newest armaments, it’s no wonder that it becomes an obvious sore spot to the entire Middle East that we aren’t a true neutral party to peace in the region when every action or non-action taken by the US shows it to be heavily one-sided in favor of Israel. Dumping Israel will be no easy task, since he would likely have the entire Congress up in arms along with the largely Jewish-owned major media that hates him anyway. Donald Trump’s speech before AIPAC during his campaign was extremely laudatory towards the Israelis, and he appeared to be very much a staunch ally and advocate of Israel and by extension the Zionists that run it. However, on the positive side Trump has already made a move that would appear to at least limit AIPAC’s influence in the US Congress when he passed an Executive Order that Eliminates Foreign Nation Lobbying. Time will tell if it’s ever enforced however, since the only foreign power lobby that has the ability to steer US foreign policy against even real US national interests is AIPAC as far as I can see. If his speech before AIPAC was simply political theater to garner Zionist support that he knew he’d need to win, Trump will have temporarily at least outsmarted the Israelis. However, I have my doubts that this is the case, especially given the Zionist Jewish control of much of the NYC business and political establishment and Trump’s great success within that very milieu that I doubt would have happened were he antagonistic to their interests. In the case of 911, he seems intent on targeting the Saudis and leaving the Israelis out of it.

5. Control the Border Allowing for Legal Immigration Only

The last step to restoring the Republic seems like a “no brainer”, and yet our southern border with Mexico has remained porous for as long as I can remember. There never seemed to be the political will to want to seriously address the issue the way that Trump did in his campaign, which I believe was a big reason for his grassroots popularity with conservative Americans in the Midwest and South and just as likely a big reason for the vitriol coming from the liberals on the East and West Coasts. For the latter group, his promises to build a wall and have Mexico pay for it sounded both absurd and racist. After all, it’s absurd to think that we could build a wall that long, and yet there already are walls in many places. If China could build a huge wall to keep out Mongol invaders in the 13th Century, why couldn’t the US build one in the 21st?

And yet, I maintain that an actual physical wall is largely unnecessary given all the high-tech surveillance equipment that the US employs these days to spy and control the average citizen. So, why not just point these electronic fences, cameras, and motion detectors out instead of pointing them inward towards us? The reason the Democrats never wanted to fix the border problem was because Hispanics were likely to vote Democratic in future elections as the DNC builds its platform on supposedly caring about the poor, indigent, victimized, people of color. And, the reason why the GOP never fixed the problem was because they’re the party of big business, tax cuts for the rich, and deregulation. And while I don’t expect those traditional Republican aspects to fundamentally change under the Trump administration (he is after all a wealthy white business man), Trump was supported largely because he promised to care about the interests of the common, largely working-class poor, and disgruntled white man pissed off about our open border policy that strains social services, creates crime and dissension within communities, and depresses wages when illegal immigrants are allowed to flood across the border with impunity. But, most Republican politicians would rather help their rich business cronies exploit cheap labor than address the issue of border security directly. After all, it’s not even considered politically correct according to the national pollsters…right? Wrong!

Turns out, millions of Americans were sick and tired of being sick and tired, and when the chance arrived to finally address the issue of the open southern border…they leaped at the chance from someone that at least verbally took it on rather than sugar coated the issue with political double-speak. Again, I firmly believe that in the case of good old American knowhow, where there’s a will, there’s a way. Previously, there wasn’t the political will, whereas now (at least so far as president Trump is concerned) there is. So, I hope for our sake, including all those immigrants who actually went through the long, arduous, and costly investment of coming to this country “legally”, the problem of our porous border gets fixed once and for all. After all, can anyone imagine a country that has national boundaries remaining a sovereign nation for very long with integrity, when anyone can simply come in regardless of their ideology, background, abilities, and criminal record?

Or, conversely, imagine if you wanted to immigrate to (by worldly standards) a prosperous and beautiful country like Sweden, for instance. Would you be allowed to stay there without a work or student VISA, get a driver’s license, enroll in their public school with a specially assigned Swedish as a Second Language Teacher, get free medical care and other social welfare programs meant for the Swedish people, etc.? Of course not. So, why does this country criminalize actual citizens for such ridiculous superficial pablum as smoking in bars, drinking a beer outside, and jaywalking but allows illegal immigration to tear the social fabric of neighborhoods apart until nothing much of value remains?

When you consider the social engineering at play here, it becomes fairly obvious that it was allowed to happen so as to bring the US down to a level of relative parity with other Third World countries to slowly chip away at its strong civic, cultural, and economic foundations and eventually merge it with transnational governmental organizations like what would be called the North American Union (NAU) just as Europe did with the European Union (EU). These regional so-called unions or blocks could then be administered through an unaccountable corporate bureaucratic elite that would eliminate the last vestiges of what remains of our Constitutional Republic so that it becomes just another province of the One World Government run by an international cartel of transnational corporate socialists, technocrats, and fascists. The good news, from my point of view, is that Donald Trump signed an Executive Order canceling the US involvement with the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) and fully recognizes the disaster of our open border policy with Mexico and economic damage wrought by the passage of NAFTA, GATT, and the FTAA that the TPP was a continuation of in Southeast Asia. Despite the severe push back from the controlled media, I certainly hope he continues to make good on his many campaign promises and begins the very tough but absolutely necessary promise to “Drain the Washington Swamp”. These 5 Steps to Restoring the Republic would, I believe, go a very long way toward doing that very thing.


Beyond Pizzagate: Elite Pedophilia, Sex Trafficking Rings and MSM Denial

(Warning! This article contains research into some very disturbing subject matter of a perversely sexual nature accompanied by some graphic imagery that should not be read or viewed by anyone under the age of 18 years-old or anyone, who has been the victim of trauma-based mind control. Parental advisory is strongly encouraged here. Again, should you be under 18 or faint of heart and/or mind, I would ask that you not read the following article. Should you decide to proceed regardless, understand that you have been warned.)

 

 

A lot has occurred in the more than month and a half since I last posted an article on the Para-Political Journal, not the least of which the rather surprising win of president elect, Donald Trump, over establishment arch-criminal, Hillary Clinton. While I’m not necessarily as hopeful as all the pro-Trump voters out there that he will be the political panacea to America’s ills that he claims he will be, I was absolutely certain that Hillary Clinton would have been an unmitigated disaster for this country on practically every conceivable level, especially when you consider her extremely corrupt past that I’ve documented in part as well as her very hawkish position regarding Vladimir Putin’s Russia. So, while I’m not a supporter of the GOP, at least with Donald Trump in the White House we could have very well staved off a WWIII against Russia ironically enough.

Beyond that, however, I believe that the Clinton’s (both Bill and Hillary) are connected through their various close personal friends and associates to what I would describe as an occult international elite pedophile ring in Washington D.C. In fact, there have been many pedophile networks over the years that have operated under “official” legal impunity for decades now, becoming more sophisticated and technologically savvy through their sex trafficking of young boys and girls around the world. However, thanks to the courageous and painstaking work of some on-line researchers that first started to break through Reddit, we now know a lot more about a elite pedophile network headquartered in Washington D.C. that has become known as the “Pizzagate Scandal”.

masonic-multiple-personality-mindcontrol-art

Before we delve into “Pizzagate” that is being viciously attacked by the MSM media as “fake news”, let’s take a look at some of the more famous sex-trafficking pedophile networks in recent US history and perhaps learn why it is that these kinds of stories get so suppressed by the mainstream media in the first place. The first pedophile network in recent memory that barely registered in the MSM was the “Franklin Scandal” first documented by Senator John DeCamp and later Nick Bryant in their respective books. Briefly, what Sen. DeCamp discovered during the course of his research was that within the upper echelon ranks of Omaha and Lincoln, Nebraska were a group of sick pedophiles, who used children from the renown orphanage there called Boys Town to satisfy their twisted sexual perversions. A fast rising member of the GOP establishment and owner of a local S&L in Nebraska called Franklin Community Federal Credit Union that later went bankrupt, Lawrence King, was one of the main pedophiles in this particular network as was the senior editor of the largest newspaper in the area, which would certainly help explain why it wasn’t investigated by the local media. Eventually, however, through subsequent trials it did start to slowly leak out and, besides DeCamp himself, a British film crew decided to do a documentary about the Franklin Scandal and were commissioned by the Discovery Channel, which was to air the documentary on prime-time television in May 1994. Unfortunately, the documentary not only never aired but was actually destroyed and thrown in the trash can after powerful Congressmen applied pressure that it be pulled. Later, the film was fished out of the trash, and most of it has been spliced back together through the work of a heroic individual, who thankfully saved it (literally) from the dustbin of history. You can now watch the documentary called “Conspiracy of Silence” on YouTube for free, and I recommend that you do so if you have not seen it already.

the-franklin-coverup-book-cover

Around the same time that the Franklin Scandal and cover-up was going on in the early 1980s, sex trafficking and prostitution of young boys and girls was going on in massive proportions in Houston, TX. The Houston Police Department were well aware of the problem but due to either apathy or departmental pedophilia corruption within their own ranks nothing was really done about it. A virtually unknown documentary called “Boys for Sale” that was released on Austin Public Access TV back in 1981 has surfaced on-line specifically addressing the sex slavery and child prostitution problem in Texas, which I highly recommend you watch. The tepid response to child sex trafficking is even a problem within the FBI itself, since they are the agency primarily tasked with investigating inter-state sex trafficking whereas Interpol is tasked with tracking it internationally. And finally, as if that weren’t enough, let’s not forget how the FBI, Tallahassee Police Department, and media completely buried the scandalous story of the “Finder’s Cult”. According to documented police records, two adults and six disheveled children were taken into custody by the Tallahassee, Florida law enforcement officers back in 1987, where they eventually discovered to their utter shock the remnants of a sophisticated child sex trafficking ring with nude pictures of children and contact info. on unsecured computers. After a write-up about the “Finder’s Cult” that was peddling children for traumatic sexual abuse to high-profile clients around the world in the Washington Post, nothing more was said or heard about the group again except for one follow up in US News and World Report. Why? Alternative investigators such as Norio Hayakawa and Peter Lavenda have discussed the mysterious “Finder’s Cult” case, but that’s about it.

At the end of the aforementioned documentary “Conspiracy of Silence” (which itself was silenced by cable television), there is shot of the Washington D.C. capitol dome with background narration saying that the Franklin Scandal doesn’t stop at Nebraska but rather involves an elite pedophile ring with tentacles that reach all the way to some of the most powerful people in Washington. This is the real reason I believe the documentary was so suppressed and why the latest Pizzagate Scandal is so important in unraveling this dark and occult web within the inner circle of powerful Washington insiders, who are trafficking in child sex slaves and abusing them in various satanic rituals such as what’s called “Spirit Cooking”. That weird term is as good as any a entry point into this terrifying and twisted pedophile labyrinth. So, let’s start there. Recently, Wiki-Leaks released what is known as the Podesta e-mails several months ago in a massive dump that they acquired, and it would shine one of the only lights available to the uninitiated into the dark corridors of power and (it would seem) elite pedophilia as well. In one of the emails, Marina Abramovic asks:

“Dear Tony, I am so looking forward to the Spirit Cooking dinner at my place. Do you think you will be able to let me know if your brother is joining? All my love, Marina”

The Tony in question is Tony Podesta, who is the brother of John Podesta. So, just to give a little perspective about this particular email, here we have a known satanic occultist and performance artist (who poses with dead goat heads and performs Crowleyian blood and sex-magic rituals in her home) asking one of the most powerful and wealthy Washington D.C. lobbyists that she’s looking forward to a “spirit cooking dinner” and inquiring whether his brother John Podesta is going to come as well. Of course, John Podesta is well known in Washington. He was the former Chief-of-Staff under Bill Clinton and a close political advisor/councilor to Barrack Obama as well as the chairman of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign for president. But I digress. Returning to the email, just what does a “spirit cooking dinner” involve? According to a Wiki-pedia entry on the “Cake of Light” (a kind of Thelema magic Eucharist described by Aleister Crowley), it involves making a wafer with oil, honey, blood, and sperm. This is presumably done in a Gnostic Mass ritual fashion with black magic style invocations and prayers to whatever spirits and/or demons you wish to summon prior to eating the wafers. Gee, that sounds swell. Can I come? I suppose the question asked would be- “Can you cum…on my wafer?” I’m not mocking people investigating this decidedly disgusting ritual, but you really have to laugh at some of this sick shit to keep from throwing up quite frankly.

marina-abramovic-and-child

Marina Abramovic is quite popular among some of the more deranged Washington, LA, and New York art world set and sycophant celebrity crowd like Lady Gaga unsurprisingly. You can even view her describing aspects of her rituals by painting instructions in what I’m assuming is pig’s blood on the wall of one of her so-called art performances. One caption reads- “With a sharp knife cut deeply into the middle finger of your left hand. Eat the pain.” Interesting enough, in one particular photo of John Podesta…he’s got a band-aid on his middle finger. I guess he was able to attend that “spirit cooking dinner” after all. His brother, Tony Podesta, is considered one of the world’s premiere patrons of the arts, but his tastes in art can be described as favoring work that (by any reasonable calculus) would be considered “torturous”, “dissociative”, and “pedophilic” in nature. So, for instance, he has a huge golden metallic statue suspended from the ceiling of one of his mansions of a headless man arching backwards in a pose eerily reminiscent of one of the victims of serial cannibalistic killer, Jeffrey Dalmer. Other paintings he has hanging prominently on his bedroom wall are of nude children and some are clearly held in bondage. “Ah”, as the media would proclaim- “He’s just got unusual and eccentric artistic tastes, that’s all.” Surely, it doesn’t reveal a single thing about the inner psyche of the man, right? Or, does it?

tony-podesta-art-inspiration

One of the more curious blank spots in the dates of the Podesta Wiki-Leaks emails might provide the biggest clue about the perverted pederast tastes of both Tony and John Podesta. The blank spot in question was during a time period when the two brothers were thought to be in Portugal. It was during this time that a little girl by the name of Madeleine McCann went missing and a feverish search for the girl ensued by the police that was subsequently splashed all over the media there. In one of the known police sketches of the two wanted suspects in the case of the kidnapped girl, the forensic sketches are an absolute dead give away of both John and his brother Tony Podesta right down to a mole above Tony’s eyebrow and an indentation on the bridge of the nose that John has from wearing glasses. Apparently, Portugal is a hot spot for pedophiles around the world, since the age of consent in Portugal is only 14. UK’s Scotland Yard investigated the kidnapping case and said that they know who abducted Madeleine but can’t say. Gee, I wonder why?

police-sketch-of-men-wanted-in-abduction-of-madeleine-mccann

In another to John Podesta email from Herb Sandler, it reads:

“Mary and John,

I think you should give notice when changing strategies which have been long in place. I immediately realized something was different by the shape of the box and I contemplated who would be sending me something in the square shaped box.

Lo and behold, instead of pasta and wonderful sauces, it was a lovely, tempting assortment of cheeses, Yummy. I am awaiting the return of my children and grandchildren from their holiday travels so that we can demolish them. Thank you so much. I hope you and your gang are well. I miss you both.

Best wishes fro a merry Christmas and Happy New Year. Herb

P.S- Do you think I’ll do better playing dominos on cheese than on pasta?”

Two things immediately stand out in this email that signify there’s a secretive code being used. The first, if a figure of speech, makes no sense. He writes that he’s awaiting the “return of my children and grandchildren from their holiday travels so that we can demolish them”. Demolish? In what way? Of course, if written by a pedophile, it could signify any number of sexually abusive tortures and/or murder. The last curiosity is in the post-script when he asks- “Do you think I’ll do better playing dominos on cheese than on pasta?” This makes no literal sense whatsoever and therefore (unless he’s merely speaking gibberish) must be a specific code for something else. The pedophilic code “playing dominos” probably means something to the effect of “the game (playing) of sado-masochistic domination (domino)” whereas “cheese” is code for “little girl” and pasta is code for “little boy” in pedo-speak. In popular urban slang, playing dominoes is also called “throwing bones”, and this (of course) very close to slang for having sex as in “boning”. Might this also put an entirely different, though revealing spin, on the major delivery chain…Dominoes Pizza? After all, the logo has the face of a domino with two dots (female=2 holes) and then one dot (male=1 hole). The hooker in the obviously coded Kubrick film, Eyes Wide Shut, was named “Domino”, which might be a clue as well as to what “Domino” is code for. John and Tony Podesta are, of course, close friends with the focus on the lead establishment in this particular pedophile ring, Comet Ping Pong and its owner James Achilles Alefantis.

james-and-tony

The major research that Reddit posters are focused on in the Pizzagate Scandal is the pizzeria, Comet Ping Pong, and the strangely telling pictures posted by its owner, James Alefantis, to his personal Instagram account prior to it being switched to “Private”. Unfortunately, the primary Reddit Forum was shut down by the CEO of Reddit in a move that forced the forum to seek refuge elsewhere on the web, which they have done at Voat.com. Fortunately, many of the pictures and comments made by James Alefantis on his Instagram were cached and saved to multiple places on the web despite the virulent smear campaign of the MSM regarding Pizzagate by going after Twitter, Reddit, Facebook, and YouTube accounts. In one picture, for instance, he has taped the hands of a little girl down on a table. Another picture that he posted is of a man at a gay nightclub wearing a tee-shirt that reads- “J’adore l’enfants” (a French sentence proclaiming “I love children”). He has also commissioned the artwork of people like Kim Noble, whose art clearly depicts various obvious acts of pedophilia taking place and is likely a victim herself suffering from dissociative identity disorder. So, while Alefantis vehemently denies any wrongdoing, much like Tony Podesta (whom I spoke about earlier)…his tastes in art and various pics from his Instagram account are decidedly pedophilic in nature.

taped-down-girl

pedohile-pizzeria

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Even the bands that have played at Comet Ping Pong have made mention of it in their live appearances. And, as I’ve discussed, there is coded language being used and embedded within the iconography of the restaurant itself. So, for instance, the Ping Pong logo as seen on his menus has a double and perhaps even triple meaning. On the surface or literal level, you see the cross paddles and think of the game of “Ping Pong”. However, on a pedo-speak level, it symbolizes S&M paddles used by a dominatrix on the submissive, in this case children. And, on a deeper meta or twilight language level, the cross paddles resemble the butterfly that is symbolic of Monarch mind-control programming to create mind-controlled sex slaves. Again, it’s quite subtle, but that doesn’t mean that it’s not there. One merely needs to be “symbol literate” to be able to read it correctly. Even if you can’t see that one, you’re given plenty more opportunities within not only Comet Pizza but another pizzeria next door in the same neighborhood called Bestas, which means “beast” in Portuguese.

child-love-logo-exposed

pizzagate-pedophile-logos

besta-pizza-logo

If you look carefully at the logo, you’ll see that it’s not only a flying pizza but a triangle within a larger triangle. According to an official document of the FBI also released by Wiki-Leaks, this symbol of a spiraling triangle within a triangle is pedo-code for man/boy love. The FBI, in investigating very secretive pedophile rings on-line and elsewhere, learned about these particular symbols along with various cyphers, meta-language, and codes as they must in order to track, indict, and convict pedophiles as they did when they were able to seize their server and finally hack their tight security protocol in order to learn the I.P. addresses of pedophiles and child sex traffickers using the cover of the Dark Web to hide their activities. Unfortunately, people like James Alefantis, whose parent company Big Cheese LLC owns Comet Ping Pong and Buck’s Fishing and Camping, is listed as the 49th most powerful person in Washington D.C. by GQ Magazine, and the FBI isn’t seriously investigating this elite pedophile ring that appears to involve various proprietors of businesses within a ten block radius of the same street and high profile politicos like the Podesta brothers, the Clinton’s (as we’ve already seen with Bill Clinton’s close personal known child sex trafficker and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein), and even Barrack Obama, who was mentioned in one of the Strator leaked emails of 2009 as “ordering $65,000 worth of pizza and hot dogs from Chicago”. Again, this makes absolutely no sense if read literally, especially when you consider the price tag and the fact that the White House won’t allow food deliveries for security reasons. The White House makes everything in house as they easily can do. If read in pedo-speak, it makes perfect sense if Pizza=Girl and Hot Dog=Boy.

This country’s supposed watchdogs, the MSM, are in such a state of ignorance, suppression, and denial as to be essentially “worthless” as the 4th estate, unless they start doing their job and expose these pederasts for who and what they truly are. And, local police, sheriffs departments, FBI, and the state and federal judiciary had better start investigating and prosecuting these sick vultures and abusers of children instead of leaving all this to the efforts on-line researchers and the community of hackers like Anonymous and myself in order for real justice to prevail. Otherwise, we’re essentially becoming (if we’re not already) a “Pedophocracy”. Stand up, speak out, and fight back for the innocent victims of child sex abuse!

hillary-clinton-letter-to-james-alefantis

comet-pizza-scandal

comet-ping-pong-pedophilia