Author Archives: fiercetruth4u

Vaccinations and the Pharmaceutical Cartel: A Chronology of the Silent Holocaust (1948-1975) Part 2

The following is the long-awaited second part to the chronology of the sordid and deadly history of vaccinations and medical malfeasance. Given how long this history is and the importance of being able to digest recent historical events in particular, I’ve decided to make this a 3 part series. As I mentioned in Part 1, this particular chronology of events was taken from an Appendix of the book, Atlantis, Alien Visitation, and Genetic Manipulation by Michael Tsarion, who in turn took it from the Leading Edge International Research Group at http://trufax.org/. I’ve selected key events from the full chronology that highlight the role that the pharmaceutical cartel has played in conjunction with their government cronies at the FDA, CDC, AMA, ACS, HHS, WHO, and even the Dept. of Defense, who have weaponized vaccinations against Third World populations abroad and marginalized groups domestically. And, while I won’t be talking about the Atlantis or Alien Visitation part of his book, mass vaccinations definitely touch upon Genetic Manipulation. As Joshua Lederberg mentions within the chronology of the text below, “live viruses (as in vaccines) are genetic messages used for the purpose of programming human cells” and “we already practice biological engineering on a rather large scale by use of live viruses in mass immunization campaigns.” After all, there are viral, bacteriological, chemical, and even foreign heavy metal debris in various vaccinations being administered to people of all ages including infants, who are the most susceptible to adverse and potentially life-long effects from vaccinations. So, for instance, we’ve already seen a tremendously troubling explosion of childhood autism rates that have skyrocketed in the past 25 years and continue to climb every year. Most doctors, however, trained as they are to be paid pharmaceutical drug pushers are at a loss to explain what causes autism, and any suggestion that certain vaccines might have something to do with it is met with either stubborn disbelief or callous indifference. And yet, clearly there ought to be grave concerns regarding most of the ingredients in the MMR, Pertussis, Influenza, Polio, DPT, and every other vaccine being injected in ever growing numbers into people at ever earlier ages.

1948 Randolph K. Byers and Frederick C. Moll of the Harvard Medical School publish an article describing children who had suffered brain damage after receiving Pertussis vaccine. The findings provided the first clear evidence that the vaccine caused serious neurological complications in children.

1948 Randolph Byers and Frederick Moll of Harvard Medical School validate that severe neurological disorders follow the administration of DPT vaccine. The research was performed at Children’s Hospital in Boston and published in Pediatrics magazine. Nothing was done by physicians to halt the use of DPT vaccine.

1948 A study of Pertussis vaccine reaction is done by Randolph K. Byers and Frederick C. Moll of the Harvard Medical School. They examine 15 children who had reacted violently within 72 hours of a Pertussis vaccination. All the children were normal before the shot. None had ever had a convulsion before. One of the children became blind, deaf, spastic, and helpless after being given the Pertussis shot. Out of the 15 children, two died and suffered from damage to their nervous system.

1948 England bans smallpox vaccine.

1948 Louis Sauer makes an interesting observation at an AMA meeting where Pertussis vaccination was discussed. Louis Sauer points out that “the neurological damage caused by Pertussis vaccine is the same as the damage caused by Pertussis (whooping cough).” This is logical because they use the bacteria in the vaccine. According to Sauer, “a customary prophylactic dose of Pertussis vaccine seems to illicit a chain of nervous system reactions and in some cases irreversible pathological changes in the brain. These findings resemble those encountered in cases of severe whooping cough (Pertussis).” In other words, the vaccine is causing the disease condition.

1949 AMA Council of Pharmacy and Chemistry goes on record to deny that dietary changes could have anything to do with prevention or treatment of cancer.

1949 U.S. Public Health Service Division of Biologics Standards establish a national potency test for Pertussis vaccine, and modify it in 1953 to establish potency limits. Despite this, the Pertussis vaccine that is pronounced “safe” still causes minimal brain damage (MBD) in humans.

1950 Professor Pierre LePine, noted scientist at the Pasteur Institute in Paris, is reported in the March 30, 1950 edition of the New York Times as saying “no more than one injection in 2,000 really prevents polio.”

1951 Theiler wins Nobel Prize for work on yellow fever vaccine.

1952 Albert Lasker, who manages the ACS, dies. Mary Lasker lobbies Congress for funds “to fight cancer,” and the National Cancer Institute Budget goes from $18 million per year to $110 million per year- half involved with the chemotherapy paradigm.

1952 Formulation of the polio vaccine begins. Tens of millions of doses of polio vaccines produced from virus grown in monkey cells infected with SV-40 (Simian Virus #40). Scientists perform experiments in laboratories to determine the correct doses of antigen and supplementary chemicals to use in the polio vaccine. (Ironically, since the scientific premise of the vaccination is faulty, a “correct dose of the antigen and chemicals” does not exist).

1953 In the United States, Senator Charles Tobey begins a Senate investigation into the cancer industry. U.S. Justice Department attorney Ben Fitzgerald is hired as special council. Fitzgerald’s report concluded that “the AMA, in direct collaboration with the National Cancer Institute and the FDA, entered into a conspiracy to suppress alternative, effective cancer treatments.” Said Fitzgerald, “if radiation, surgery and drugs are the complete answer, then the greatest hoax of the age is being perpetrated upon the people by the continued appeal for funds for further research.” Senator Tobey is dispatched with a “convenient heart attack” as has happened to others who threaten the cancer industry. Tobey’s replacement, Senator John Bricker, orders Fitzgerald to stop the investigation. Fitzgerald refuses and is fired. The investigation is halted and buried.

1953 At the University of Zurich, Dr. S.Kong of the Pediatric Clinic compiles a list of 82 cases of Pertussis vaccine damage from world literature.

1953 Pertussis vaccinations in France, Chile, Austria, Holland and the Scandinavian countries are positively correlated with cases of autism. U.S. ignores data.

1953 The Swedish conduct a study on the Pertussis vaccine. Anna L. Annell, a Swedish researcher, writes a major work on Pertussis which indicates that “pertussis vaccine may be associated with the most varying kinds of cerebral complications which may be cortical, subcordical, or peripheral.” Encephalitis after vaccination is known to produce the same range of disabilities and impairment. Annell also wrote, “during the past few decades certain of the epidemic children’s disease, measles in particular, have shown an increased tendency to attack the central nervous system. After the 1920’s a large number of cases involving CNS damage were reported.

1954 Salk vaccine begins to be given to school children in Philadelphia.

1954 Parke-Davis pharmaceutical company combines the DPT shot with Polio vaccine. The new combination of four vaccines is called Quadrigen.

1954 Nobel prize to Enders and Robbins for work on polio virus.

1954 General vaccination programs against Polio begin in the United States.

1958 World literature now contains 107 cases of severe reaction to Pertussis vaccine (93 of those cases were in the U.S.). At the Fountain Hospital in London, Dr. J.M. Berg analyzed the 107 cases and found that 31 of them showed signs of permanent brain damage. Berg calls attention to the danger of mental retardation as an effect of the Pertussis vaccine and emphasizes that “any suggestion of a neurological reaction to a Pertussis vaccination should be an absolute contraindication to further inoculation.” The United States medical establishment ignores and suppresses the data. American physicians maintain that the damage caused is small compared to the “lack of ‘serious’ reactions in children vaccinated.” No data has been found to justify a basis for this conclusion.

1958 Verdict of $147,000 rendered against Cutter Laboratories in California for the crippling of two children with the Salk polio vaccine. Cutter Labs was the only vaccine manufacturer not part of the Rockefeller Trust.

1958 Survey of 13,000 adolescent boys in Philadelphia who had been vaccinated, 7.5% were associated with crime.

1958 Outgoing President of the Gerontological Society, Dr. A. Lansing, muses “finding a cure for cancer and heart disease would be a major financial disaster which would bankrupt the social security system and the insurance companies.”

1959 The United States never conducts its own clinical trials on Pertussis vaccine, but instead relies (as it still does today) on data collected by Britain’s Medical Research Council in clinical trials in England in the 1950’s for “proof of vaccine safety and effectiveness in newborns and children.” Interestingly, Britain’s trials on 50,000 British children were performed on children more than 14 months old. None were newborns.

1959 National Institutes of Health (NIH) approves licensing of Quadrigen vaccine for children, containing Pertussis, Diphtheria, Tetanus, and Polio vaccines. The new combination vaccine was found to be highly reactive and was withdrawn from the market in 1968 after parents started filing lawsuits against Parke-Davis for vaccine damaged children.

1959 Dr. Albert Sabin develops oral live virus polio vaccine.

1959 Pertussis vaccine found to have allergenic effect on animals.

1960 British Medical Journal publishes an article by Swedish vaccine researcher, Justus Strom, who stated that the neurological complications from the disease Pertussis are less than that in the Pertussis vaccine. Strom also pointed out that “whooping cough (Pertussis) had changed and had become a milder disease, making it questionable whether universal vaccination against it is justified.”

1960 General vaccination program for measles begins in the US.

1960 It is estimated in 1960 that over 1,000,000 children have vaccine-caused disabilities, including learning difficulties and school behavioral problems. They also have allergies, speech difficulties, visual problems, and difficulties in adjustment and coping.

1961 A senior school medical officer in northern England, J.M. Hooper, finds that parents are beginning to refuse to bring children for a Pertussis booster shot, based on earlier violent reactions to the vaccination. Children were suffering from collapse, vomiting, and uncontrollable screaming. No one paid attention to these warnings.

1961 Sabin polio vaccine immunization campaign.

1967 The FDA stops the use of an experimental cancer vaccine which was producing significant results. Developed by James Rand and Ernest Ayre, a recognized cancer specialist. The Rand vaccine produced significant improvement in terminal patients in over 30% of patients. It cured tumors and breast cancer in four to six months without radiation, surgery, or chemotherapy. The FDA Commissioner was James L. Goddard, the same man who persecuted the use of DMSO. Goddard used the DMSO issue in 1966 in an attempt to foster a medical dictatorship in the U.S. in collusion with the medical and pharmaceutical industries and remove viable treatments from public access.

1967 At the Bland-Sutton Institute of Middlesex Hospital in London, George Dick writes, “it has been long known that increasing the number of Pertussis bacteria per dose of vaccine increases the frequency of reactions. It would be surprising if decreasing the size of the infants receiving a particular vaccine did not also increase the reactions.” A violation of a standard axiom in medicine, which matches the size and weight to an amount of substance. (Why are newborns getting the same dosage as an adult?)

1967 Justus Strom writes that his earlier article about Pertussis reaction in a 1960 issue of the British Medical Journal had aroused considerable attention and criticism, noting, “the vaccination reactions may be regarded chiefly as manifestations of a toxic effect- an individual predisposition of some significance.” Strom reports on 167 cases of severe reactions to the DPT shot in Sweden.

1967 Dr. Vincent Fulginiti, M.D., former chairman of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases, asserts that inactivated measles vaccine should no longer be administered.

1967 Killed measles vaccine is discontinued in the United States.

1967 General vaccination program for Mumps begins in US.

1967 Science Magazine (10/20/67) features article on Joshua Lederberg of the Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine. Lederberg notifies the scientific world that “live viruses (as in vaccines) are genetic messages used for the purpose of programming human cells” and “we already practice biological engineering on a rather scale by use of live viruses in mass immunization campaigns.”

1969 Federal inspectors hold back 130,000 cattle carcasses for removal of carcinomas and cancer of the eye.

1969 Mary Lasker initiates “the War on Cancer”, eventually resulting in Nixon signing it into law in 1971. It would provide vast taxpayer dollars to the NCI and derivative benefits to the ACS.

1969 Dr. Harlan Jones, professor of medical physics and physiology at the University of California, states that according to carefully researched statistics, cancer patients who did not receive surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation had a greater life expectancy than the ones who did receive “treatment” by about four times.

1969 Diphtheria outbreak in Chicago. The Chicago Board of Health reports that 37.5% of the Diphtheria cases had been fully vaccinated or showed immunity.

1969 Neurologically defective 4 and 5 year old children begin to appear.

1969 A Congressional study reveals that 37 of 49 top officials of the FDA who left the agency moved into high positions within the pharmaceutical companies they had regulated. (See 1975)

1969 Melchior describes 22 children in which there was a close temporal connection between various vaccinations, especially Pertussis, and infantile spasms.

1969 U.S. Department of Defense sought funds from Congress to create a synthetic biological agent that does not normally exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired. Funds granted in 1970 Appropriations.

1969 Richard Nixon orders a “ban” on chemical and biological weapons. After the ban, the Army Biological Warfare Laboratory at Fort Detrick is renamed “The Frederick Cancer Research Institute” and was turned over to the National Cancer Institute for civilian use. The military section is later renamed the “U.S. Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Disease” (U.S.AMRIID), which is “restricted to defensive research.”

1970 G.A. Rosenberg writes, “an autoimmune allergic mechanism has been postulated as the cause of the occurrence of post-vaccination encephalitis, possibly with an initial invasion of the nervous system by a virus, with subsequent antigen-antibody reaction.”

1970 Due to the increasingly mild nature of whooping cough (Pertussis), infant deaths cease from naturally acquired Pertussis in Sweden. Deaths associated with vaccines continue. Sweden stops Pertussis vaccination in 1970.

1970 U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) reports “as much as 26% of children receiving Rubella (German measles) vaccination in national testing programs developed arthralgia and arthritis. Many had to seek medical attention, and some were hospitalized.”

1970 A study by Pittman reveals Pertussis vaccine can induce hypoglycemia due to increased production of insulin. Study is corroborated in 1978 by Hannick and Cohen and by Hennessen and Quast in West Germany. Result: Pertussis and DPT vaccines can cause diabetes.

1970 FDA Commissioner Dr. Herbert Ley blows the whistle on the FDA and its corrupt relationship with the medical and pharmaceutical cartels. It is ignored by an intimidated government. Ley is forced out and replaced.

1970 Carl A. Larson publishes an article, “Ethnic Weapons,” in Military Review, 11/70.

1971 A study by Stella and Chess reveals that children with congenital rubella frequently display classic autistic features, including impaired ability to relate new stimuli to remembered experience.

1971 The CIA infects pigs in Cuba with African Swine Fever, a deadly disease. The entire swine population of Cuba is slaughtered to protect humans. A second such epidemic in 1980 in Cuba, with equally devastating consequences, was of unknown but suspicious origins.

1972 A mysterious epidemic of dengue hemorrhagic fever hits Cuba and affects 300,000 Cubans. More than 150 die, including over 100 children. Evidence exists that the CIA released dengue-infected mosquitoes on the island. Court testimony in 1984 by Cuban counter-revolutionary terrorists supports this conclusion.

1972 United States Agency for International Development (USAID) makes contact with the old Sterilization League of America, now called the “Association for Voluntary Surgical Contraception”, which is paid by the U.S. government to sterilize non-whites in foreign countries.

1972 Dr. Dean Burk of the National Cancer Institute declares in a letter to a member of Congress that high officials of the FDA, AMA, ACS, and US Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare (now HHS) were deliberately falsifying data and information, lying, committing unconstitutional acts and in other ways thwarting potential cures to which they were opposed. (Letter to Congressman Louis Frey Jr. also dealt with the issue of laetrile, a non-patentable natural product opposed by the California Medical Association, who only sanctions the use of dangerous or toxic treatment for cancer).

1972 WHO Bulletin No. 47 refers to creation of an immune virus (see 1969) and suggests that a useful way to study effects would be “to put it into a vaccination program and observe the results.” It is theorized that WHO used the smallpox vaccination program in Central Africa for this study, since the spread of HIV infection coincides precisely with the most intense and recent smallpox vaccination campaigns. Information on the Central African countries most infected with HIV precisely matches WHO figures indicating the number of people vaccinated in these areas. The virus requested would selectively destroy the T-cell system. (1972 Federation Proceedings of WHO).

1972 British Journal of Psychiatry #120 reveals that “psychotic disorders may be caused by viral infections.” (Ref: viruses induced by vaccines).

1975 A 1975 military manual predicts the development of “ethnic chemical weapons which would be designed to exploit naturally occurring differences in vulnerability among specific population groups.” (Ref: “Biological Weapons and Third World Targets,” Science for the People, July-August. 1981, pp. 16-20).

1975 The British medical journal Lancet reports on a study which compared the effect on cancer patients of chemotherapy or no treatment at all. No treatment proved significantly better policy for patient survival and quality of life.

1975 Federal Drug Administration Bureau of Biologics concludes that Diphtheria toxoid (vaccine) is “not as effective an immunizing agent as might be anticipated.” They admit that Diphtheria may occur in vaccinated people, and not that “the permanence of immunity induced by the toxoid is open to question.”

1975 Japan stops using Pertussis vaccine following publicity about vaccine-related deaths.

 

 

 

Advertisements

Vaccination and the Pharmaceutical Cartel: A Chronology of the Silent Holocaust, Part 1 (1667- 1947)

Vaccination is Changing the Genetic Code

I maintain that the widespread use of vaccines by the pharmaceutical cartel and the medical-associated governmental agencies that back and support it is the most insidious and indeed one of the deadliest frauds ever to be foisted onto a trusting public. Study after study has consistently shown that vaccines are far more dangerous to a person’s prospective health, particularly children and the elderly, than any so-called immunity that they’re reported to confer. In fact, comparative analysis between various vaccinated and unvaccinated populations, when viral infections of one kind or another occur, often reveal no real improvement among the vaccinated population. Quite often, those that are vaccinated develop the very infectious disease that they were supposed to prevent due to the live and dead viruses in the serum contaminating the host.

Additionally, the adjuvants (including aluminum hydroxide, formaldehyde, and thimerosal) used as preservatives are also highly toxic to the immune system and can cause a variety of illnesses and auto-immune disorders, including what we’re seeing so much of now with the entire Autism Spectrum Disorder in our youth following their childhood vaccinations.

The following chronology is a small piece of much larger chronology that was originally compiled by Valdamar Valerion of the Leading Edge Research Group, whose website can be found at (http://www.trufax.org). It was later used by Michael Tsarion in his book Atlantis, Alien Visitation, and Genetic Manipulation. As Michael Tsarion puts it in his introduction: “This superb and needed chronology clearly exposes how the ‘Serpent Brotherhood’ have been preying on humankind, while working on their main agendas of rebuilding their technological hardware and vacating the planet. The document particularly highlights the devastation to human health, the insinuations of the addictive dangers of sugar, coffee, and tobacco, and how vaccinations, addictions, and war have led to millions of ritual deaths.”

Obviously, I’ve chosen to focus exclusively on the devastation to human health wrought by vaccinations in this article. I’ve also chosen to go from the earliest times on record in the use of vaccines up to 1947, which is when the National Security Act was signed that started a new era of post-WWII bio-warfare against “enemies of the state” both foreign and domestic. I’ll pick it up there and bring it up to date in Part 2.

Another Child Hamred by Deadly Vaccine Eugenics
1667 The apparent danger of using animals serums foreign to human beings and animal serums foreign to other animals is reported in medical literature in when lambs blood was unsuccessfully used as a human blood transfusion. (Sir Graham Wilson, The Hazards of Immunization, London 1967, Athlone Press).

1667 Epidemics of smallpox, dysentery begin.

1668 Merck begins an apothecary shop in Darmstadt, Germany.

1669 Outbreak of cholera in China.

1670 Measles and tertian fever epidemics displace cholera.

1672 Dysentery becomes mild and some smallpox occurs.

1673 Inoculation against smallpox appears in Denmark. (See 1778).

1674 First mention of diabetes mellitus in British Pharmaceutice Rationalis, by Thomas Willis, member of the Royal College of Physicians.

1675 Malaria epidemic in England and discovery of “Peruvian bark” (quinine).

1712 First record of vaccinations for smallpox in France.

1717 Inoculation against smallpox instituted in England by Lady Mary Montague after she returns from Turkey, where it was in a popular experimental stage at the time

1719 Outbreak of the plague in Marseilles, France through 1720.

1721 In the United States, a clergyman named Cotton Mather attempts to introduce a crude form of smallpox vaccination by smearing smallpox pus into scratches in healthy people. Over 220 people are treated during the first six months of experimentation. Only six had no apparent reaction. Mather was bitterly attacked for recommending this practice in Boston, Massachusetts.

1722 In Wales, a Dr. Wright refers to inoculation against smallpox in the British Isles as “an ancient practice.” A citizen of Wales, 99 years old, states that inoculation had been known and used during his entire lifetime, and that his mother stated it was common during her life, and that she got smallpox through her “inoculation.”

1723 First record of smallpox immunization in Ireland, when a doctor in Dublin inoculates 25 people. Three died, and the custom was briefly abandoned.

1724 First record of vaccination for smallpox in Germany. It soon fell into disfavor due to the number of deaths. Years later, doctors were able to reintroduce it.

1754 Inoculation for smallpox is introduced in Rome. The practice was soon stopped because of the number of deaths it caused. Later, the medical profession would successfully reintroduce it.

1763 Epidemic of smallpox in France wipes out a large part of the population. It was immediately attributed to inoculation, and the practice was prohibited by the French government for five years.

1763 The first recorded episode of biological warfare in the United States occurs when white colonial settlers give smallpox-infected blankets to Native Americans who sought friendly relations. Also a significant case of genocide.

1768 The medical profession in France is successful in re-instituting vaccination for smallpox.

1778 Danish physicians move to open two major vaccination houses in Denmark by order of the King.

1778 In Italy, infants were inoculated by Neapolitan nurses without the knowledge of parents.

1790 Edward Jenner buys a medical degree from St. Andrews University for £15.

1791 Edward Jenner vaccinates his 18 month old son with swine-pox. In 1798, he vaccinates his son with cow-pox. His son will die of TB at the age of 21.

1798 General vaccine programs against cowpox instituted in the U.S.

1801 First widespread experimentation with vaccines begins.

1802 The British government gives Edward Jenner £10,000 for continued experimentation with “smallpox vaccine.” The paradigm that vaccines provide “lifetime immunity” is abandoned, and the concept of “re-vaccination” is sanctioned.

1809 Massachusetts encourages its towns to make provision for the vaccination of inhabitants with cow pox vaccine.

1810 The London Medical Observer (Vol.VI, 1810) publishes particulars of “535 cases of smallpox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases of smallpox after vaccination, and 150 cases of serious injury from vaccination, ten of whom were medical men.”

1822 The British government advances Edward Jenner another £20,000 for “smallpox vaccine” experimentation. Jenner suppresses reports which indicate his concept his causing more death than saving lives.

1831 Smallpox epidemic in Wurtemberg, Germany, where 995 vaccinated people succumb to the disease.

1831 In Marseilles, France, 2,000 vaccinated people are stricken with smallpox.

1838 Smallpox epidemic in England.

1847 American Medical Association (AMA) organized in the U.S.

1848 Rockefeller interests establish prime goal of control of U.S. medical system.

1853 In England, the Compulsory Vaccination Act. From 1853 to 1860, vaccination reached 75% of the live births and more than 90% of the population.

1855 Compulsory nature of Massachusetts vaccination statute is firm, and a pre- condition for school admittance. Statutes created in the belief it would “protect children from smallpox.”

1857 Vaccination in England is enforced by fines. Smallpox epidemic begins in England that lasts until 1859. Over 14,000 die.

1858 England experiences a 7 year epidemic of Pertussis (ending in 1865) in which 120,000 die.

1860 Introduction of antibiotics and immunization into the U.S. (Through 1896).

1860 Encyclopedia Britannica (8th Edition) states “nothing is more likely to prove hurtful to the cause of vaccination and render the public careless of securing to themselves its benefits, than the belief that they would require to submit to re-vaccination every 10 to 15 years.” Later, in the 11th edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, the policy would change: “it is desirable that vaccination should be repeated at the age of 7 to 10 years, and thereafter at intervals during life.”

1867 Vaccination Act of 1867 in England begins to elicit protest from the population and increase in the number of anti-vaccination groups. It compelled the vaccination of a baby within the first 90 days of its life. Those who objected would be continually badgered by magistrates and fined until the child turned 14. The law was passed on the assurance of medical officials that smallpox vaccinations were safe.

1867 Nonpayment of fines for skipping smallpox vaccination result in harsh penalties.

1870 Third major smallpox epidemic in England begins and lasts until 1872. Over 44,800 die.

1871 In Birmingham, England, from 1871 to 1874, there were 7,706 cases of smallpox. Out of these, 6,795 had been vaccinated.

1871 In Bavaria, Germany, vaccination is compulsory and re-vaccination is commonplace. Out of 30,472 cases of smallpox, 29,429 had been vaccinated.

1871 Worldwide epidemic of smallpox begins. It claims 8 million people worldwide.

1871 Select committee of the Privy Council convened to inquire into the Vaccination Act of 1867 (England), as 97.5% of the people who died from smallpox were vaccinated for it.

1872 Japan institutes compulsory smallpox vaccination. Within 20 years 165,000 smallpox cases manifest themselves.

1884 In England, Dr. Charles Creighton is asked to write an article for the Encyclopedia Britannica on vaccination. After much research internationally, he concludes that vaccination constituted “a gross superstition.” Later, Creighton writes two books, “Cowpox and Vaccinal Syphilis” and “Jenner and Vaccination.”

1884 In England, more than 1700 children vaccinated for smallpox die of syphilis.

1884 Dr. Sobatta of the German Army reports on the results of vaccination to the German Vaccination Commission, which subsequently publishes data proving that re-vaccination does not work. Deaths from vaccination are routinely covered up by physicians.

1886 A seven year period begins in Japan where 25,474,370 vaccinations and re-vaccinations are performed in Japan, representing 66% of the entire population of Japan. During that period, there are 165,774 cases of smallpox with 28,979 deaths. (See 1955).

1887 In England, Dr. Edgar M. Crookshank, professor of pathology and bacteriology at Kings College, is asked by the British government to investigate the cowpox outbreak in Wiltshire. The result of the investigation was contained in two volumes of “The History and Pathology of Vaccination,” in which he states that “the credit given to vaccination belongs to sanitation.”

1888 Bacteriological Institute in Odessa, Russia, tries its hand at a vaccine for anthrax. Over 4,500 sheep are vaccinated; 3,700 of them die from the vaccination.

1889 In England, a royal commission is appointed to inquire into certain aspects of the vaccination question. The committee would be in session for 7 years and would issue 6 reports, with the final report in 1896. The result of the final report was the Vaccination Act of 1898.

1895 Diphtheria vaccination program begins. Over the period lasting until 1907, 63,249 cases of diphtheria were treated with anti-toxin. Over 8,900 died, giving a fatality rate of 14%. Over the same period, 11,716 cases were not treated with anti-toxin, of which 703 died, giving a fatality rate of 6%.

1896 Carlo Ruta, a professor at the University of Perugia in Italy, states that “vaccination is a worldwide delusion and an unscientific practice, with consequences measured today with tears and sorrow without end.”

1898 Rockefeller interests prime goal of control of medical education in U.S.A.

1902 The Chicago Health Department develops its “vaccination creed,” which states that “true vaccination repeated until it ‘no longer takes’ always prevents smallpox. Nothing else does.” The policy is immediately taken up by the U.S. military.

1904 Carnegie Institution of Washington establishes a biological experiment station at Cold Spring Harbor, New York. Eugenicist Charles B. Davenport is assigned to be director.

1905 Eleven states in the U.S. have compulsory vaccination laws; 34 states do not. No states physically force injections on citizens. Vaccination was made compulsory without state legislation providing for analysis of its history.

1907 England passes the Vaccination Act of 1907, after the newly elected government comes to power. The act allowed a statutory objection from a parent relative to a child vaccination before the child was four months old.

1907 Indiana passes the world’s first compulsory sterilization law for “all confirmed criminals, idiots, rapists and imbeciles” who were confined in state institutions. By 1908, 30 states passed similar laws.

1909 New York Press, January 26, 1909, publishes a report by W.B. Clark which states, “cancer was practically unknown until cowpox vaccination began to be introduced. I have seen 200 cases of cancer, and I never saw a case of cancer in an unvaccinated person.” Scientific evidence begins to mount that where human lymph is employed in a vaccine, syphilis, leprosy and TB soon follow. Where calf lymph is employed in the creation of a vaccine, TB and cancer soon follow. (Cancer and Vaccination by Esculapius).

1911 General vaccination programs against typhoid begin in the United States.

1912 First whooping cough (Pertussis) vaccine created by two French bacteriologists, Jules Bordet and Octave Gengou, who wanted to use it in Tunisia. After they grew Pertussis bacteria in large pots, they killed it with heat, mixed it with formaldehyde (used to embalm bodies) and injected it into children.

1917 Wagner von Jauregg treats syphilitic paralysis by injecting malaria.

1918 Great influenza epidemic attributed to widespread use of vaccines.

1919 Diptheria vaccinations injure 60 and kill 10 in Texas.

1921 BCG tuberculosis vaccine developed.

1922 A study by Samuel Torrey Orton connects emotional disturbance with neurological problems. This insight was lost after World War II when psychology, psychiatry, and psychoanalysis became popular, breaking the connection. The emotional disturbances caused by vaccines then became financial fodder for the new psych-industries. With the causes suppressed, a new industry was born.

1924 Diphtheria vaccinations kill 25 in Bridgewater, CT and 20 in Concord, NH.

1924 Diphtheria vaccinations kill 6 in Baden, Austria.

1925 Danish researcher Thorvald Madsen tries a modified Pertussis vaccine during an epidemic in the Faroe Islands. It did not prevent Pertussis. (See 1933).

1925 Doctors at the Paris Academy of Medicine discuss deaths occurring shortly after vaccination in Holland and other European countries.

1925 In England, less than 50% of infants are vaccinated for smallpox. 6 deaths occur. (See 1872).

1925 General vaccine programs against tuberculosis began in the United States.

1927 Diphtheria vaccinations injure 37 and kill 5 people in China.

1927 British government appoints a committee to inquire into “vaccine lymph,” as it is noticed that the “glycerinated calf lymph” used in vaccinations causes deaths from “sleepy sickness.” Two London professors bring notice of the problem to the government in 1922. It takes 5 years before the government responds.

1927 Smallpox in England dwindles almost to the vanishing point. Fatality of the unvaccinated cases is less than half of the vaccinated cases.

1928 Cases of post-vaccination encephalitis force creation of two Committees of Investigation in Britain.

1930 Max Theiler develops a yellow fever vaccine.

1930 Diptheria vaccinations injure 32 and kill 16 in Columbia.

1931 Cornelius Rhoads, a North American pathologist at the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Investigations in Puerto Rico, carries out an experiment on Puerto Ricans deliberately infecting them with cancer. Thirteen die. In a letter leaked to the Puerto Rican Nationalist Party, Rhoads wrote, “the Puerto Ricans (sic) are lazy and degenerate. What the island needs is something to exterminate the entire population. I have done my best to further the extermination.” The president of the PRNP brings the case to the press, and a legal investigation is initiated. The prosecutor exonerates Rhoads, calling him “a mentally ill person or a man with few scruples.” Rhoads goes on in later years to direct the establishment of U.S. Army chemical warfare labs in Maryland, Utah, and Panama, for which he was awarded the Legion of Merit in 1945. (See 1945, Rhoads).

1931 Roosevelt endorses polio “immune serum,” precursor to vaccines in 1950’s.

1932 The U.S. Public Health Service initiates a study in Tuskegee, Alabama, where black men are given syphilis. Four hundred men were unwittingly given the disease. No medical care was offered. The study ended when it was discovered in 1972, after 40 years. The office supervising this study was the predecessor of the Center for Disease Control unit now in charge of the AIDS program.

1932 Diphtheria vaccines injure 171 and kill 1 in Charolles, France.

1932 Research (Young) indicates that neuritis is commonly precipitated following vaccination with anti-tetanus, anti-pneumococcal, and anti-meningitis serums.

1933 Danish researcher Thorvald Madsen discovers the Pertussis vaccines ability to kill infants without warning (SID). He reports that two babies vaccinated immediately after birth died in a few minutes.

1933 American researchers report that children react to Pertussis vaccine with fever, convulsions, and collapse.

1933 Vaccination programs against Yellow Fever begin in the United States.

1933 Compulsory immunization instituted in Geneva.

1933 Diphtheria cases decline in Britain over the period of a year.

1936 Pertussis vaccine is introduced in the United States. Autism begins to appear in children shortly thereafter.

1938 Fifty-eight British physicians sign a mandate against compulsory immunization in Guernsey point to the virtual disappearance of Diphtheria in Sweden, a country without Diphtheria vaccination.

1938 The idea of “booster shots” arose as a “solution” to poor antibody response in infants and newborns. These become customary in the 1940’s.

1938 Compulsory immunization instituted in Hungary. Diphtheria cases rise 35% by 1940.

1939 Compulsory vaccination in Germany raises diphtheria cases to 150,000.

1940 Germany orders compulsory mass immunization for children. As a result, by 1945, Germany’s Diphtheria cases increase from 40,000 to 250,000.

1941 Louis Sauer of Evanston, Illinois, an avid supporter of mass vaccination, reports that only 27% of a group of 89 babies developed “protective antibodies” when vaccinated at three months of age or less.” Sauer urges that Pertussis vaccination “begin no earlier than seven months” because “most of these infants did not yet possess the power to develop adequate immunity when they were injected so early in life.”

1942 University of Columbia issues a report on St. Louis Encephalitis. Professor of Neurology at Columbia University Josephine B. Neal writes that “pertussis encephalitis in early childhood was likely to leave individuals crippled with motor and personality handicaps.”

1943 American vaccine researcher Pearl Kendrick reports that adding a metallic salt seemed to heighten the capacity of the Pertussis vaccine to produce anti-bodies. (Metal salt is an “adjuvant” in this way). Some metallic salts used are those of aluminum (alum). Pearl Kendrick is the researcher that urged that Pertussis vaccine be combined with Diphtheria vaccine. Later the Tetanus vaccine was added, producing the nefarious DPT Vaccine.

1943 General vaccine program against influenza begins in the U.S.

1943 Infantile paralysis epidemic kills 1200 and cripples more in U.S.

1943 Child psychologist Leo Kanner observes a new illness appearing in U.S. children, “inborn autistic disturbance of affective contact.” The problem became known as “infantile autism” or simply “autism.” Outstanding features of this new problem: self-absorbed alienation, inability to relate in the ordinary way to people and situations from the very beginning of life, detachment, nervous hostility with strangers, emotional bluntness and isolation, impaired relationships, and reading with little or no comprehension and inability to process experience. As a result of this process, gaining wisdom and learning from experience becomes impossible.

1943 Diphtheria cases in Nazi occupied France rise to 47,000 after Germans force compulsory vaccination. In nearby Norway, which refused vaccinations, there were 50 cases of Diphtheria.

1944 Asperger in Vienna describes the first cases of adult “autism” to appear.

1944 Health Practitioners Journal, June 1944, reports Dr. S. S. Goldwater, the New York Commissioner of Hospitals states “as a result of the drugs, vaccines, and other suppressive treatments used to check diseases, chronic diseases are growing at such a rate that America may become a nation of invalids.”

1945 A survey of 10,000 boys in the U.S. having had the smallpox vaccination also notes that 6% were associated with crime.

1945 Japan surrenders twice, followed by U.S. bombing of Hiroshima/Nagasaki and a third and final surrender. The Allies mandate compulsory vaccination in Japan. The first cases of autism follow pertussis vaccine introduction.

1946 U.S. Government Pertussis vaccine expert Margaret Pittman and FDA’s Charles Kendrick decide to test Pertussis vaccine by injecting it into the brains of mice and see how many survive.

1946 Werne and Garrow describe the deaths of identical twins within 24 hours of their second Pertussis shot.

1946 Dr. Gerson demonstrates medical proof of complete remissions of cancer in over 33% of his patients before the Pepper-Neeley Congressional Sub-Committee for Hearings on S1875, a bill to authorize the president to wage war on cancer. Lobbying forces for surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy defeat the bill by four votes. The bill supported research into dietary means for preventing and reversing cancer. Gerson’s publications were black-listed and he lost his license to practice medicine in New York.

1947 Matthew Brody at the Brooklyn Hospital gives detailed descriptions of two cases of brain damage leading to death in children receiving Pertussis shots.

1947 National Security Act established in the United States in order to permit the extension and continuation of Nazi efforts in the United States under cover of “national security,” setting the stage for chemical, biological, and electronic sensitization of the population for the remainder of the 20th century. Efforts begin to convince the American public that their “enemy” is Communism, not fascism, setting the stage for the upcoming McCarthy period and the sham known as “the cold war” which would extend and continue the military industrial/pharmaceutical complex.

1947 Charles Posner of the Harvard Medical School Department of Neurology writes, “almost any vaccination can lead to noninfectious inflammatory reaction involving the nervous system. The common denominator consists of vascularity that is often associated with demyelination.” (demyelination is the stripping of the insulation away from the nerves).

1947 The British Medical Research Council begins testing 50,000 children in Britain with the Pertussis vaccine. All children tested are more than 14 months old (not newborns). Eight infants had convulsions within 72 hours of the shot, 34 had convulsions within 28 days of the shot. British doctors denied a connection between the vaccine and the convulsions, declaring the tests a success and began administering it to all British children. Despite the Fact that none of the tests were conducted on children under 14 months old (newborns and babies), the United States holds the tests in evidence that the vaccine is safe for newborns as young as 6 weeks of age. The testing would continue until 1957.

 


The Roots of Europe’s Destruction and the Chaos in the Middle East

The roots of the European migrant crisis, which of course is directly tied to the proxy wars and chaos in the Middle East (particularly in places like Libya and Syria), run through foreign policy objectives implemented by Washington and Tel Aviv. This article will address them both, since that’s the only way you’ll be able to grasp what’s really going on as opposed to the constant media spin and propaganda we’re subjected to on a daily basis. First, let’s look at the US and NATO’s role in the attack on Libya and the underlying reasons for Gaddafi’s killing that naturally led to Libya becoming a completely failed state and breeding ground for terrorists.

Back in 2003, probably fearing that the Bush-Cheney regime would use his previous funding of certain groups the US designates as “terrorists” as justification to lump him in with the “Axis of Evil” list, Gaddafi renounced radical Muslim jihadists and handed over all his weapons of mass destruction (WMD’s) in a move that even Time magazine recognized by writing “Now Gaddafi’s a Good Guy”. He then established full diplomatic relations with the US shortly afterwards. Unfortunately, it wouldn’t last, since he’s wasn’t privy to a secret US military plan within the Pentagon hierarchy to take out 7 countries in 5 years including Libya. This plan was specifically told to Wesley Clark, who had been the Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, by a 3-Star general in the Pentagon late in 2001. The countries that this general mentioned the Pentagon was going to take out were: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finally ending with Iran. Later on in 2008, neocon Douglas Feith (under-secretary of defense for policy at the time) said that Donald Rumsfeld had sent a letter to President Bush on September 30th, 2001 that the US should seek to establish “new regimes” in the seven countries I’ve just enumerated.

After 9/11, the Neocons that came to power under the Bush-Cheney White House had previously written what their geopolitical playbook would be with “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” under the aegis of a Neocon think tank known as Project for the New American Century (PNAC), wherein they advocated that the US use its military might to project its power abroad to protect its “national interests” (i.e. US multinationals like Exxon-Mobile) and prevent any other country from becoming a legitimate rival to US hegemony now that the Soviet Union had dissolved as a major super power in the world. Another somewhat more covert (though no less important) aspect of US foreign policy as it pertains to the Middle East is its unequivocal support, both economically and politically, for the State of Israel that includes its illegal territorial ambitions in the region. We’ll deal with that later; for now let’s go back to Libya.

Prior to the French and US led NATO attack back in 2011, on behalf of radical Islamic jihadists in the Benghazi region, Libya was a flourishing and prosperous country. Gaddafi shared his country’s oil profits with his citizenry, had developed the largest agricultural irrigation project in the world helping to green the country for farmers, would advance $20,000 to newly married couples, and had the highest standard of living out of any African country. Where he made a fatal mistake, however, in terms of so-called US as well as French “national interests” is when he began to advocate for what he called a “Pan-African Union”. A major part of this philosophy was an economic system to fund their own development projects outside the control of the predatory IMF/World Bank system and the French domination of Francophone countries that would be backed in part by the Libyan Dinar, which was subsequently backed by gold and silver. This would not be tolerated by the IMF/World Bank nor France, who have always sought to plunder Africa’s rich mineral, oil, and precious metal resources on the one hand, while keeping the countries of Africa exploited and enslaved to debt on the other hand.

Disrupting that scenario, as Gaddafi did, is what triggered the coup d’etat of Western-backed rebel jihadists, who would take over the country only with the massive aerial bombing support by NATO fighter jets. So, even though the vast majority of the Libyan people were pro-Gaddafi, you had a handful of radical jihadists (including Al-Qaeda of North Africa and the Al-Nusra Front), who began an insurrection against him. Naturally, Gaddafi launched a counter-offensive, where he had practically wiped out these radical jihadists with very little bloodshed. The only stronghold left that they still controlled was in the city of Benghazi. At one point, he told the “rebels” to throw down their weapons, and they wouldn’t be harmed. However, it is at this stage in the campaign that the US State Department under Secretary Hillary Clinton pressed for attacking Gaddafi under the assumption that to do nothing would lead to a “bloodbath” of the civilian population in Benghazi. International human rights organizations like Amnesty International knew that it was an absurd claim, given that there was no indication that Gaddafi would risk being ostracized by the world community by committing such atrocities against his own people. But, as usual, lies and BS hysterics won out, and NATO launched a major bombing campaign against the Libyan army to aid the rebels in taking over the country, where it very quickly descended into civil war and chaos.

It is now known that military intervention into Libya by NATO wasn’t anything to do with humanitarian reasons. Even then Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta admitted in his memoirs that, “our goal in Libya was regime change.” As documented by David Ray Griffin in his excellent book, Bush and Cheney: How They Ruined America and the World, when Gaddafi’s own son, Saif, along with other high-ranking members of the Libyan regime tried to negotiate a resolution, Hillary Clinton told a general at the Pentagon to refuse to take the calls, since as an intelligence asset working with the Joint Chiefs of Staff told Saif, “Secretary Clinton does not want to negotiate at all.” So, if anyone was out for blood, it was then Secretary Hillary Clinton. After Gaddafi’s beaten, bruised, bloodied, and bayoneted dead body was shown in a video by the Benghazi jihadists, who would later kill US Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other staff members- Hillary Clinton crowed, “We came, we saw, he died.” By 2016, at least 100,000 Libyans left for Europe adding substantially to the refugee crisis there that continues to push their social service systems to the brink of collapse. And, after Gaddafi was taken out, his enormous weapons arsenal ended up in the hands of Al-Qaeda, Al-Nusra, and ISIS terrorists around the world, including Syria, where many went to fight a proxy war on behalf of what has become the US-Israel-Qatar-Saudi Arabian nexus against Syria’s Assad regime.

In fact, as I’ve discussed in a previous article about Libya, US Ambassador Christopher Stevens was helping the CIA and Pentagon under General David Petraeus run weapons out to radical jihadist groups that would later pop up in Syria and attempt to topple Assad. The consulate was little more than a convenient cover for this to take place. According to famed investigative reporter, Seymour Hersh, in an article published in the London Review of Books entitled “The Red Line and the Rat Line”:

“In January, the Senate Intelligence Committee released a report on the assault by a local militia in September 2012 on the American consulate and a nearby undercover CIA facility in Benghazi, which resulted in the death of the US ambassador, Christopher Stevens, and three others. The report’s criticism of the State Department for not providing adequate security at the consulate, and of the intelligence community for not alerting the US military to the presence of a CIA outpost in the area, received front-page coverage and revived animosities in Washington, with Republicans accusing Obama and Hillary Clinton of a cover-up. A highly classified annex to the report, not made public, described a secret agreement reached in early 2012 between the Obama and Erdoğan administrations. It pertained to the rat line. By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria. A number of front companies were set up in Libya, some under the cover of Australian entities. Retired American soldiers, who didn’t always know who was really employing them, were hired to manage procurement and shipping. The operation was run by David Petraeus, the CIA director who would soon resign when it became known he was having an affair with his biographer.”

 

While Clinton claimed that she knew nothing about the weapons transfer taking place during the congressional hearings into the Benghazi scandal, Judicial Watch and Wiki-Leaks were able to show definitely that she was not only aware, she was actively pushing for weapons to be sent to “jihadists within Syria, including ISIS.”

Moving onto Syria, we learn that there are hidden motives, forces, and players at work, should we care to look below the surface of what is clearly one of the worst humanitarian crises on the planet right now. As I stated previously, Syria was on the list of 7 countries that the Pentagon wanted to orchestrate regime change against, but the $64,000 question is, “Why do they want to topple Syria’s Bashar al Assad?” Fundamentally speaking, the war is about the control of pipelines. According to long-time energy and geopolitical researcher, F. William Engdahl, “it became clear to some geopolitical Washington strategists that Qatar could play a strategic role in pushing Russia out of the EU natural gas game and put a US-controlled supplier, Qatar, in the dominant role.” That’s why back in 2009 the Emir of Qatar, who owns the largest gas fields in the world, went to Damascus to make a proposition to Syrian President Bashar al Assad. He proposed the construction of a natural gas pipeline that would begin in Qatar, cross over into Saudi Arabia and Syria, and finally end in Turkey, where the gas would be sold to the lucrative EU markets.

Assad, however, declined the offer, saying that he wanted to “protect the interests of [his] Russian ally, which is Europe’s top supplier of natural gas.” As Engdahl says, “This was the beginning of the NATO decision to militarily destroy the Assad regime.” Instead, Syria decided to broker a deal for an alternative route that would run a pipeline from Iran through Iraq and on to Syria thereby leaving Qatar and Turkey out in the cold. In July of 2012, the three countries of Iran, Iraq, and Syria signed a Memorandum of Understanding, which officially outlined the proposed pipeline sometimes called the “Shi’ite Pipeline”. Besides bringing great riches to Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey, should Assad be defeated and the pipeline built, the war had at least three main goals. According to geopolitical analyst Dmitry Minin, they were:

1) Break Russia’s gas monopoly in Europe. (Russia currently supplies around 40% to the EU market…not a complete monopoly but clearly the largest seller)

2) Free Turkey from its dependence on Iranian gas.

3) Give Israel the chance to export its gas to Europe by land at less cost.

As I’ve pointed out in my past articles on the Para-Political Journal, Israel has definite geopolitical goals in the Middle East, which contribute greatly to its chaotic conditions as well as the Muslim world’s hatred of the US for being their primary unconditional ally. But, just what are Israel’s long-term geopolitical goals in the Middle East? One of the best sources for understanding those goals comes from Christopher Bollyn’s book The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle EastIt’s in that book that he discusses what’s called the “Yinon Plan” based on the work of an Israeli strategist named Oded Yinon, who wrote about the plan in a document called “A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties”. Published in Hebrew back in 1982 by the World Zionist Organization’s Department of Information, the “Yinon Plan” (as it’s commonly known as) calls for “the destruction of the armies of large Arab states and the Balkanization of their nations into ethnic mini-states.” In the English version, under the title The Zionist Plan for the Middle East, Yinon states:

“The Western front, which on the surface appears more problematic, is in fact less complicated than the Eastern front, in which most of the events that make the headlines have been taking place recently. Lebanon’s dissolution into five provinces serves as a precedent for the entire Arab world including Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and the Arabian Peninsula, and is already following that track. The dissolution of Syria and Iraq later on into ethnically or religiously unique areas such as in Lebanon, is Israel’s primary target on the Eastern front in the long run, while the dissolution of the military power of those states serves as the primary short term target. Syria will fall apart, in accordance with its ethnic and religious structure, into several states such as in present day Lebanon, so that there will be a Shi’ite Alawi state along its coast, a Sunni state in the Aleppo area, another Sunni state in Damascus hostile to its northern neighbor, and the Druzes who will set up a state, maybe even in our Golan, and certainly in the Hauran and in northern Jordan. This state of affairs will be the guarantee for peace and security in the area in the long run, and that aim is already within our reach today.”

This was written when Israeli attacks against Lebanon were at their fiercest, turning cities like Beirut into a similar kind of war zone hell hole that we see in places like Syria’s Aleppo today. Millions have fled into neighboring countries and migrated as far north as Sweden in the EU. As Christopher Bollyn relates in the book, “The Zionist vision for the Middle East rests on two essential premises: To survive, Israel must become an imperial regional power, and must effect the division of the whole area into small states by the dissolution of all existing Arab states.” And, this is precisely what’s occurring in the Middle East with the US-Israeli plans to redraw the map of the Arab states according to their own geopolitical strategies, which although not exactly the same certainly dovetail together. Despite what Neocon and Neo-Liberal politicians try to tell us, the Zionist plans for the Middle East most certainly are not in our best interests. As Linda Heard in an article entitled “Is the US Waging Israel’s Wars?” tells us:

“There is one thing that we do know. Oded Yinon’s 1982 Zionist Plan for the Middle East is in large part taking shape. Is this pure coincidence? Was Yinon a gifted psychic? Perhaps! Alternatively, we in the West are victims of a long-held agenda not of our making and without doubt not in our interests.”

Finally, I’d like to address the cultural, social, and ethnic destruction of Europe due to the millions of Arabs, who have migrated into the EU due to in large part to the proxy wars being fought in the Middle East (particularly those of Libya and Syria that I’ve documented thus far). However, in spite of real refugees in certain war-torn countries, there are also greater economic, political, and social opportunities available that are drawing people to migrate to Europe that simply don’t exist in many Middle Eastern countries. European countries, many of which are still trying to recover from the devastation of the 2008 financial crash, are now having their social service systems put under even greater strain by being forced by their own governments to accept millions of Arab immigrants, most of whom aren’t interested in culturally assimilating whatsoever. European countries such as France, Germany, and Sweden that have allowed for the greatest number of Arabs to migrate in are also experiencing a huge rise in crimes (thefts, assaults, rapes, murders, etc.) committed against their domestic population, which has quite naturally led to a rise in nationalist/identity movements in spite of the mostly PC climate among the establishment that dismisses their concerns as nothing but racist “Islamophobia”.

The question that politicians like France’s Emmanuel Macron or Germany’s Angela Merkel simply refuse to answer, it would seem, is: “Does a sovereign country have the right to defend their national culture, ethnic heritage, language, religious values, and integrity against total dissolution by an outside foreign element that seeks to replace it?” If the answer is “yes”, then the EU would be wise to limit how many immigrants they allow in before a civil war erupts between the newly arrived mostly Muslim and mostly Arab immigrants and the mostly Christian and mostly white European nationals. When you look at a documentary on Sweden’s current immigrant crisis, for example, especially when reports about Swedish girls being raped by the recent transplants go unaddressed by the justice system, I think it’s high time that Europe start seriously thinking about stemming the tide of migrants flooding into their countries before they wake up one day and can’t recognize their own country anymore. Many are already saying just that. As unbelievable as it might sound, however, even the massive amount of migrants flooding into Europe from Middle Eastern countries could well be part of a social engineering program that was actually outlined in detail some 100 years ago by a man many consider to be the “father of the European Union”. This man is Count Richard Nikolas von Coudenhove-Kalergi.

As documented in the book The Killing of Uncle Sam, “Coudenhove-Kalergi became an advocate for Woodrow Wilson’s ‘Fourteen Points’ and the pacific initiatives of Karl Hiller. In 1921, he joined the Masonic lodge Humanitas, which he used as the launching pad for his Pan Europa movement. One year later, he published the Pan Europa manifesto, which captured the attention of Baron Louis de Rothschild and Max Warburg (father of Paul, the founder of the Federal Reserve), who opted to fund the movement to unify Europe with 60,000 gold marks. In his books Praktischer Idealismus and Kampf im Paneuropa, Coudenhove-Kalergi argued for the dissolution of national borders and the promotion of mass allogenic (genetically dissimilar) immigration. The result of this immigration, Coudenhove-Kalergi wrote, would be the creation of ‘the men of the future,’ whom he called mestizos. Such men would be of mixed Caucasian, Negro, and Asiatic blood and would appear ‘very similar to the ancient Egyptians’. The mongrelization of mankind, according to Coudenhove-Kalergi, would produce salubrious results, such as the dissolution of nationalism, the elimination of racism, and the eradication of disparities in levels of human intelligence. Since the mestizos would be of limited intelligence, Coudenhove-Kalergi maintained, they could be easily manipulated and controlled by ‘Jewish leaders of socialism’ (herrenmenschen), who had been singled out by divine providence to rule the world.”

So, here is Coudenhove-Kalergi talking about the dissolution of national borders via a Pan Europa superstate, mass genetically-dissimilar immigration, the creation of a mestizo racially mixed “man of the future” that looks similar to the beige color of the ancient Egyptian (albeit with very limited intelligence), and the control of such a thoroughly mixed and culturally inert population by a Jewish socialist elite, whom divine providence has made them “with their most exalted unselfishness, to erase the original sin of capitalism, to free people from injustice, violence, and subservience and to change the redeemed world into an earthly paradise”. Reading that last quote, I’m thinking, “What are you, fucking nuts?! Take a look at the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, if you want to get a sense of what Jewish injustice, violence, and subservience really looks like rather than being so deluded as to thinking they’re going to free you from it.” But, as crazy as his theories are to my mind, he was able to garner some very powerful support and backing, which again appear to be playing itself out on the world stage now.

After WWII broke out, Coudenhove-Kalergi first fled to France and then to the US after the Nazis invaded in 1940 where he came under the care of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) that has essentially dominated US foreign policy since their founding in 1921. During that time, he helped to draft the wartime strategy of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) and the postwar plans for the revitalization of Europe. Among his many disciples included such notable and powerful men as Senator William Fulbright, Allen Dulles, Thomas W. Braden, William J. Donovan, Arthur Goldberg, Jay Lovestone, and Joseph H. Retinger, who worked together to create the American Committee for a United Europe. This committee would then give rise to the European Coal and Steel Community, which was the predecessor to the European Union. This man was very well respected by some of the highest ranking men in the councils of government, as this list clearly shows and as his duties entailed, and this is only proven further when in 1950 he received the first annual Karlpreis (Charlemagne Award) for his contribution to European ideals. And, as far as Coudenhove-Kalergi is concerned, part of those “European ideals” apparently calls for the elimination of the Caucasian race and the creation of a socialist Superstate in a similar vein as to what the EU actually is today. Now, with an understanding of the writings of Coudenhove-Kalergi firmly in mind, suddenly the cultural crisis stemming from the mass migration from Arab countries aided and abetted by certain well-placed NGO’s that have a far reaching agenda for Europe, we can begin to see that it’s perhaps not such an accident after all but rather the playing out of Kalergi’s Pan Europa Plan.

 

Primary Sources

Griffin, David Ray. Bush and Cheney: How They Ruined America and the World. Olive Branch Press, 2017.

Bollyn, Christopher. The War on Terror: The Plot to Rule the Middle East. 2017

Howard-Browne, Rodney and Paul L. Williams. The Killing of Uncle Sam: The Demise of the United States of America. River Publishing, 2018.

 

 

 

 


Inside the Sex Trafficking Cult NXIVM

Recently, the leader of what people previously associated with it have described as an “extreme cult” called NXIVM (pronounced “nex-ee-um”) was arrested in Mexico and arraigned in a Texas court, along with an inner circle recruiter and co-conspirator. The leader’s name is Keith Raniere, who also went by the futurist-sounding moniker “Vanguard” among NXIVM members, and the co-conspirator charged (along with him in sex trafficking) is Allison Mack, a former B-list actress who is perhaps best known for her starring role in the TV series “Smallville”. However, when you look at the parts she’s played in both film and TV, they are awash in mind-control symbolism as described by former women, who were former programmed sex slaves. So, for instance, Allison was in the movie “Lost in Oz” that is obviously another spin-off of the original “Wizard of Oz”, the symbolism of which is used extensively in what’s called Monarch Programming (CIA Sex Slave Programming). As I discussed in presentation I gave dealing with what I feel is the most important movie dealing with this taboo subject, Stanley Kubrick’s “Eyes Wide Shut”, even the name “Oz” is significant to the occult if you know what to look for it in Hollywood Babylon.

HOLLYWOOD, CA – AUGUST 01: Allison Mack attends Amazon Studios’ premiere for “Lost In Oz” on August 1, 2017 in Hollywood, California. (Photo by Todd Williamson/Getty Images for Amazon Studios)

Outwardly, NXIVM was a popular New Age-styled so-called “Self Help” organization that promised it could transform peoples’ lives utilizing psychological techniques and methods that, to an uninitiated observer like myself, look an awful lot like mental manipulating methods like Scientology, Neuro-Linguistic Programming, and Landmark Education. However, as behaviorally manipulative as these strategies are in separating gullible people from their hard-earned money, this was merely the outer shell of NXIVM. The inner core of Keith Raniere’s NXIVM cult was made up of very wealthy benefactors of Raniere’s business schemes and lavish lifestyle, including the most prominent (and no doubt generous) of them…Sara and Clare Bronfman. These two sisters are of course the heirs to the Canadian Seagram’s Liquor Company fortune made by Edgar Bronfman Sr., who was very well-connected and powerful in his own time. According available press reports, the Bronfman sisters spent some $150 million to bail out Raniere’s failed commodities bets in the market, another $30 million to purchase real estate in Los Angeles and around Albany, NY, and some $11 million to purchase a 22-seat personal jet.

The fact that Keith Raniere was able to fleece naive and wealthy people out of millions of dollars to take his training courses and listen to his ego-inflating seminars, along with floating his mostly failed business ventures, isn’t surprising or even all that remarkable in the grander scheme of criminal malfeasance. After all, prior to his adopting his New Age guru persona, he ran a pyramid scheme called “Consumers’ Buyline”, which was indicted in New York and several other states for financial fraud and eventually settled out of court for thousands of dollars without admitting to any wrongdoing. Shortly thereafter, around 1998, he started NXIVM that eventually grew to be one of the most influential “Self Help” cults of its kind, with billionaires like Virgin Records founder Richard Branson and millionaires like Emilio Salinas (son of former Mexican president Carlos Salinas) having taken courses. What makes Keith Raniere and NXIVM deeply disturbing is that he was using girls like Allison Mack to recruit women (including underage girls) into his personal harem for sex and (according to an ex-girlfriend) has a documented history of psychological and sexual abuse to include multiple instances of rape.

So, the logical question knowing all this is- “Why did it take so long to finally arrest him under what had been a long history of sexually abusive practices?” While it’s obvious that former members of the secret sex slave sorority within NXIVM called DOS that stands for “Domunus Obsequious Sororium” which loosely translates to “Lord/Master of the Obedient Female Companions” were intimidated in any number of ways from ever leaving the cult and discussing with authorities what took place within the inner confines of their training facilities, there is perhaps another reason why indictments were so slow in coming to fruition. My theory is that NXIVM had some very powerful allies with the kind of political clout to keep them from facing the discordant music of their making even considering that the co-founder of NXIVM was Nancy L. Salzman, a former Clinton Global Initiative member along with Sara and Clare Bronfman. To be a member, you have to be invited and pay at least $15,000 a year in contributions. Allegations from a former inner circle member of NXIVM, Kirsten Keefe, claim that an effort was made by Clare Bronfman to hack into the computer of her own father, Edgar Bronfman Sr., using a log key virus that is able to see a person’s key strokes and therefore break their e-mail passwords. Eventually, Clare was successful, and it allowed Keith Raniere the ability to read Mr. Bronfman’s private e-mails including those sent to his personal friend Hillary Clinton. Even Wiki-Leaks didn’t get all of Hillary Clinton’s e-mails sent over an unprotected server that prompted an aborted FBI probe and that many of her supporters blame for her ultimate defeat in the 2016 presidential election. That’s because she had an estimated 30,000 e-mails destroyed before the FBI could get to them and Wiki-Leaks could subsequently hack and release them. How many were between Edgar Bronfman and herself? And, what exactly was discussed? We’ll probably never know for sure. However, the fact that Edgar Bronfman was the head of the Jewish World Congress certainly bespeaks to high level political connections regarding Israel that almost always gets what it wants from the US government, especially those in the State Department.

One of the mainstays of political corruption has always been the “honey trap”, wherein a promising politician is lured into a compromising position by prostitutes, mind-controlled sex slaves, and/or minors as a form of entrapment and blackmail. And, as I documented in a previous article on Para-Political Journal, this was done routinely by known pedophile Jeffrey Epstein using his own underage girl recruiter into his extensive harem that are then trafficked to wealthy and powerful men like Hollywood director Brian Singer and of course Bill Clinton, who was a frequent flier of the “Lolita Express” jet Epstein operated and a guest at his palatial estate. Now, Bill Clinton obviously didn’t need any prodding to jump at the opportunity that he had long taken advantage of previously many times, including known instances of the rape of women like Juanita Brodderick and Kathleen Wiley. However, anything done at Jeffrey Epstein’s mansion would have been video recorded and very likely sent directly to Israeli Mossad for safekeeping and easily used as political blackmail should he ever decide to go against their interests on key policy decisions.

It’s also safe to at least assume that Edgar Bronfman Sr., who sat next to Hillary Clinton during his 75th birthday and had amassed an immense fortune from the Seagram’s Company that is alleged to have ties to the mafia, was not only connected politically to Washington but particularly and especially to the Jewish elite domestically and abroad. In that respect, his personal e-mails to heads of state (including Hillary Clinton), powerful business leaders, and personal acquaintances would have made for some interesting insights for a sex trafficking cult like NXIVM, who could certainly use that information for their own financial blackmail purposes as Israeli Mossad already were using it for political purposes.

Proof of just how sick and twisted Raniere’s NXIVM actually was comes from former members of his inner circle talking about being “branded” (the flesh of their upper thigh being cauterized in other words) with the initials “KR” and “AM”, referring to Keith Raniere and Allison Mack respectively. The idea of “branding” these girls can be seen as part of a traumatic physical and psychological mind-control tactic to enhance and enforce these girls’ sex slave attachment to Raniere as his personal property the way, for instance, a rancher brands his cattle or in this case a master brands his slaves. Those familiar with what’s known as “trauma-based mind control” will see how tactics such as this can also cause the mind of an individual to “split” into alters or what is clinically referred to as “Dissociative Identity Disorder” (DID), wherein multiple personalities are created within a person that can then be programmed for various purposes including the “Sex Slave” alter. Therefore, while it’s unknown at this time the extent to which NXIVM was employing “branding” specifically for this function, it’s certainly well within the realm of possibility that this was the case given what we know about “trauma-based mind control” going all the way back to the MK-ULTRA days of the 1950’s and 60’s.

The use of various cults like NXIVM being used by the CIA as fronts for mind-control techniques is also nothing new, as we’ve seen with articles documenting just such known connections with cults like the one Jim Jones ran in Guyana prior to its elimination. Hopefully, a lot more information will come out at the trial as Keith Raniere is extradited back to New York, and witnesses start coming forward as to the wider dark web of his operations with people and organizations that we may find are deeper than we previously imagined. High level cases involving mind-control and/or sex trafficking, however, have a way of “resolving” themselves quickly and quietly with damage control falling on “convenient scapegoats” so that the real puppet masters can maintain “plausible deniability”. And, if that doesn’t work, they can always slap a case with a state’s secrecy act due to “National Security” (which is another way of saving them from embarrassing revelations). This essentially puts the entire case under a “Sealed Indictment”, where you won’t even be allowed to read the transcripts of the trial. So, let’s hope that doesn’t happen here, but (if it does) don’t say I didn’t warn you.

 


What’s Wrong with the Kids Today? (A Study in the Social Engineering of America’s Youth)

I’ve reached an age now, unfortunately, where I’m completely “out of step” with the entire current and flow of the times. And, when I say everything, I mean the values, the culture, the ideologies, the attitudes, the music, the priorities, and pretty much everything else that defines modernity, which is (to my mind) more and more resembling some kind of hybrid Frankenstein-like monstrosity cross between George Orwell’s 1984, Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, and Mike Judge’s prescient movie “Idiocracy”. One of the central arguments to my overriding critique is that, beginning with the Millennial Generation and moving forward to their “born digital” children, this country has been systemically transformed into nation of entitled, politically-correct, hyper-sensitive, pussies, and wussies, who due to an extended (and some would argue never ending) childhood along with a heavy dose of social engineering is ushering in the transformation of society into the hands of the Trans-humanist Agenda.

Brave New World by Aldous Huxley

The philosophy of trans-humanism is based on the insidious assumption that humans should and must merge with the machines of their making becoming an essentially cybernetic organism in order to transcend the limitations of their own innate biology. The confluence of technologies being heavily funded by DARPA and other invested technocrats to bring this about involve everything from nano-technology, cryogenics, genetic manipulation of DNA, robotics, cybernetics, and of course quantum computing or AI (Artificial Intelligence). Now, much of the research and development for these convergent technologies is being done at the university level prior to either being implemented within the military (where soldiers are always the guinea pigs of mad scientists along with the traditional cannon fodder of wars) or farmed out to the corporate world and into the public domain. However, in order to get the public to accept increasing levels of techno-fascist control (let alone willfully go along with such a radical transformation of our very evolution as a species), you’ve got to get the younger generations alienated from their core self, which is one of the real functions of schooling. Afterwards, they can be transformed into obedient servants of the ruling elite, mindless consumers with no moral compass, and socially collectivized through various means. And, wouldn’t you know it? This is exactly what’s been going on.

Living in the Matrix

Now, as I’ve discussed previously, the origins of this country’s decent into a collectivized, dependent, mass -society rather than one that values individual liberty, ingenuity, self-reliance, and producing its own needs for itself goes back much further in history to right after the Civil War. If you study history, you’ll find that it was during the period of reconstruction from about the 1870’s to the 1890’s where so many of the institutions that we now take for granted really came into being. One of those was public schooling, which prior to that period didn’t exist in the form we know it as today. And yet, most people in America were still some of the most literate and educated people in the world. However, during this time, the founders of the US system of public schooling imported an idea that had started in Prussia (what is now mostly Germany) in order to create a “dumbed down” class willing to serve a corporate financial and industrial elite, who managed to consolidate their power into monopolies and later cartels of great wealth and power. So, while there was a literal machining of America’s economic power and shift from the largely rural farming and ranching life into the factory jobs of the cities, there was also a corresponding machining of the American mind as well from one of the resourceful pioneer spirit to one adaptive to being a cog in the machine of corporate industry.

Looking for Life Except on Earth

Now, as time went on and the social engineers perfected their methods, we saw the rise of what Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book Between Two Ages called the “psycho-civilized” society when kids were given Ritalin, Adderol, and Zoloft in the 1990s. This reminds me of what Aldous Huxley was talking about in Brave New World with a drug that he called “soma”, which was administered to essentially placate any anxieties you might have about your life in a coercive micro-managed society. What had changed in the civilization that schools were now being turned into psychiatric-administered prisons? Charting the shift in focus isn’t necessarily easy to pinpoint, but a good indication as to where it took shape was around the late 1960’s and early 1970’s when you saw college campuses radicalized due to Vietnam War, Civil Rights Movement, Women’s Movement, etc. It was also around that time when the US government was experimenting on unsuspecting soldiers, students, medical patients, and others during the infamous MK-ULTRA Program, which studied the effects of various chemical, electrical, and hypnotic methods of inducing different levels of mind-control. What Timothy Leary and Ken Kesey were doing in proselytizing the use of LSD actually had an decidedly un-radical effect on generations of youth, who “dropped out, turned on, and tuned out”. After all, you can’t very well affect much radical change in the systems of power killing people in Vietnam, regimenting people’s lives in corporate offices, and subjecting black people to 2nd class citizenship if your brain is fried from taking too many hits of acid doled out by hippies acting as unpaid stooges of the CIA and FBI.

And so, the Utopian promises of the Hippies and Yippies turned into the Dystopian nightmare of the Hipsters and Yuppies, where it has remained ever since. And, yet just when you thought it couldn’t possibly get any worse than that….it has. The hedonistic drug-addled days of the cocaine and disco-fueled 70’s followed by the moronic, moralistic, and greedily ego-inflated cocaine and hair band fueled 80’s weren’t what you would call high water marks in American history, but you could have some mindless fun dancing the night away blitzed out of your mind in the never ending pursuit of trying to get laid (at least until AIDS scared the shit out of people enough to think about getting married). Now, when you look at kids in their teens or even people in their 20’s, it’s like looking into a blank cypher, not even from the drugs so much as the hypnotic trance that is induced from their cell phone fetishism.

Cell Phone Suck

They’ve also often got their ear buds in and are listening to their i-Tunes or something, which (if it was put out in the last 20 years) probably sucks. Granted, this is an opinion, but it’s also one of basic musical taste that even an 8-year-old can usually distinguish. After all, as one guy said, “the 1960’s had Jimi Hendrix, whereas we got Lenny Kravitz.” The 60’s had Janus Joplin, whereas we have Miley Cyrus. Even in the realm of Hip Hop, the 80’s had RUN-DMC, Beastie Boys, Grandmaster Flash, and Public Enemy. This generation has Lil Jon, Lil Wayne, and Lil Kim. They’ve gotten so stupid, I suppose, that they can’t even be bothered to actually spell out “Little” and therefore have to abbreviate it to “Lil” for people that can’t spell anyway. If only they had that “Lil” bit of talent it takes to actually be worth listening to, I might give a rat’s ass. Sorry, all you Millennials and younger. You clearly lose out in the cultural wars by a long shot. “So what if the music is a lot worse?”, you ask. What does that have to do with anything? Let’s just say that a big part of the social conditioning that goes on in the course of “dumbing down” a population is done in the course of their music, since this particular art form (more than any other) defines the cultural tonality and attitude of an entire generation.

Modern Education

Now, that we’re living in what the media is calling a “Post-Truth” era, is it possible to see what’s going on with college-aged kids now without falling for all the “Social Justice Warrior” bullshit that is so typical in social media these days? Perhaps it is, and if you’ve got the patience to follow my line of reasoning, I hope you show how it’s comprehensible. First, you might remember that what could have turned into a actual movement but never seemed to gain any footing outside camping outside parks, bridges, and City Halls, we can see some of what I’ve described as “collectivization” during the “Occupy Wall Street” protests. Anytime a speaker would address those assembled, everybody would repeat what the speaker said immediately after it was said. Are we to conclude that people had to repeat the words just in case they didn’t hear it the first time? And, if so, why would everybody be so hard of hearing? Or, was it more likely a way of socially indoctrinating the people into “group think”, which is to say no thinking at all? I personally lean towards the later. There’s also been heavy protests around university campuses to remove Civil War era statues, particularly if the statue in question is a Confederacy figure. After all, we can’t have these statues honoring these men as they were obviously racist and blah, blah, blah. I hate to break it to these dumb ass kids, but most everyone in the South and even in the Northern states (in spite of what you may have heard) were racist back in the Civil War days. So, about the only thing they’ll accomplish in removing these statues at public expense (mind you) is that the next time they take a history exam where they’re asked who the major Confederate General was during the Civil War, they won’t have the General Lee statue to remind them of it on their test anymore. How ridiculous has it gotten when university students are now advocating for “limiting free speech” instead of expanding it? In many ways, this is actually going in reverse to the days of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) back in the 60’s, which whatever you think think of their politics at least fought to be heard among their peers rather than censoring them. When conservative speakers like Milo Yiannopoulos and Ann Coulter aren’t even allowed to give a talk on campus grounds, what does that say about freedom to explore different ideas (no matter how you might object to them) at college? Or, what kind of climate does it foretell when college professors are essentially shouted down for what a student would call a “micro affront” or “mini aggression” to use their Newspeak.

Education as Escape From Reality

And now, you’ve got high school kids walking out of their classes (not because they’ve finally come to understand how schools are giving them a 12-year lobotomy and engaging in behavioral modification) but because they feel “unsafe” in schools. Hello, retards! I mean, mentally-disabled to be politically correct about it. You do realize that life can’t be made perfectly “safe”? In fact, you’ll find out just how “unsafe” it can be when you start driving and realize that you can’t steer a car and text with the same hand. Then, you’ll end up plowing into a retainer wall on your way to work at Burger King, which is about all your diploma will be good for when you graduate. So, here we have whole swaths of kids, who are openly attacking the 2nd Amendment based on the Parkland High School shooting in Florida instead of looking at why the FBI that were given multiple warning signs never followed up or why a deputy waited outside the building for at least 4 minutes, while the shooting was taking place instead of immediately entering the school. A similar situation was reported to have occurred at the Columbine shooting, where cops waited outside for a long enough time until there were enough killed to justify more gun control legislation that is sure to follow. All that’s needed to see how these kinds of scenarios are allowed to play out is to enact a “problem” (school shootings), get the inevitable “result” (shock and outrage), and then bring in your “solution” (more gun control and psychiatric involvement in schools), which was planned all along. Limiting the 2nd Amendment only serves to further enslave the citizenry to the totalitarian goals of an unchecked police state, whereas getting kids off of mood-altering SSRI drugs and arming certain teachers and/or security guards on a school campus would help greatly in actually doing what is necessary to solve the problem. But, to do this would counter act these students’ long-time programming leading up to what Aldous Huxley envisioned in Brave New World of a society, wherein people would actually come to love their slavery and by extension their masters. It is these masters of manipulation and social engineering, who don’t so much shoot bullets as they do situations and create the Pavlovian response conditions for an obedient, dumb, and hyper-reactionary citizenry through subtle forms of conditioning.

Aldous Huxley Quote on psycho-pharma fascism

 

 

 


Pentagon’s Previously Secret Project into the Study of UFOs is Revealed

Bigelow Aerospace

It’s a brand new year, and the Para-Political Journal is here to usher it in with an interesting Exo-Political story that has been getting a lot of positive buzz lately. I speaking of course of recent revelations as revealed in the New York Times and Politico Magazine that from 2007-2012 there was a secret government funded project called the “Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program” (AATIP) whose ostensible mission was the scientific collection and analysis of UFOs. It was created by then Senator Majority Leader, Harry Reid (Nevada-D) along with Senator Daniel Inouye (Hawaii-D) and Ted Stevens (Alaska-R) under the direction of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and allocated some $22 million, which by bloated Pentagon monetary standards is tiny. However, it’s still a substantial sum given by a government that has for the last 50 years claimed that there was nothing to the UFO phenomenon, when the Air Force closed Project Blue Book down. We’ve only learned about the project from a career intelligence officer, who worked as the lead on the project named Luis Elizondo. Much of the money for the project went to Robert Bigelow, who runs a huge private aerospace company called Bigelow Aerospace and a para-normal investigatory organization called N.I.D.S. (National Institute for Discovery Science). You might remember this later organization from its fascinating investigations into the infamous “Skinwalker Ranch”, which Las Vegas news anchor and occasional host of the popular nighttime radio show Coast to Coast AM, George Knapp, has also discussed and written about.

George Knapp News Anchor

The question is- “What exactly does this ultimately mean or signify in the realm of Ufology?” So far, at least, we don’t yet fully know the answer as the voluminous reports that were supposedly composed during the course of the project’s research haven’t yet been released to the public for scrutiny, and I’m somewhat leery that it ever fully will be quite frankly. Naturally, this would be a real shame to the potential value that this scientific data represents to the field of Ufology in perhaps learning about the phenomenon outside of the usual rumor-mongering or ridicule context in which it quite often resides. However, one shouldn’t be all that surprised if that is the fate of the final reports, since even Luis Elizondo claimed he quit due largely to the excessive secrecy that government agencies have surrounded themselves with in dealing with this issue. For any serious researcher, this is real problem that isn’t going away anytime soon and it usually takes legal action to pry information out that almost always isn’t worth the time and money necessary to do it. My personal hunch about it, as some of you may have already read about in my article on the Secret Space Program Conference, is that the real action is in the private sector. In other words, if the US has indeed recovered ET craft going at least as far back as the Roswell, New Mexico crash of 1947 and Aztec, New Mexico crash of 1948 as declassified FBI documents seem to suggest, it would be well-connected and sophisticated private corporations that would ultimately be tasked with reverse engineering the technology for covert utilization and weaponization before it eventually filtered down into the public domain on a limited basis.

Aztec UFO Crash

Certainly, whether you believe Col. Philip Corso’s thesis as described in his book “The Day After Roswell” that certain high-technologies we’re familiar with today like integrated circuit chips, night vision, and fiber optics were seeded by ET technology recovered from the Roswell crash or not, were these events to have occurred…it would be the private sector with heavy contract ties to the military that would be tasked with the R&D of these technologies as that is what they’re designed to do in the first place. Interestingly enough, Bob Bigelow is reported to have specially altered and/or expanded his storage warehouses due to his possession of certain metal alloys thought to have come from UFOs. I would agree with other commentators about this story that were this indeed the case…this would clearly be the most important evidence in confirming the existence of an extraterrestrial source for the phenomenon. Before he died back in 2014, I felt that one of the most important researchers in abduction research was Dr. Roger Leir, who I had the opportunity to meet and speak with at the Bay Area UFO Conference. At the conference, he gave an excellent presentation regarding his extensive research into strange foreign objects that he had removed from people over the years that believed they had been abducted and subsequently experimented upon. Check out the talk he gave at the International UFO Congress back in 2012. These foreign objects found in the hands, feet, and other parts of the body of abductees are usually called “alien implants” and have very anomalous characteristics as Dr. Leir soon found in his research post-surgical removal. So, for instance, these metallic implants (often as tiny as a pencil lead or BB) would be surrounded by a biological membrane in an area with significant nerve tissue, thereby overriding the body’s natural tendency to create inflammation in its rejection of a foreign object. In testing the metallurgy, he determined that they often had isotopic ratios of elements not available on this Earth and was even able to pick up certain Hertz frequencies emanating from the implant. I took copious notes during his lecture, but you can also read about it in his books on the subject such as “The Aliens and the Scalpel”. Dr. Leir was a very humble and open-hearted man, and he will definitely be very hard to replace in the study of alien implants given his tireless dedication and expertise.

Dr. Roger Leir

While some people like David Jacobs sees the abduction phenomenon as an extensive hybridization program of the “Grays”, as they’re known in the alien abduction literature, others like Steven Greer see the entire phenomenon as orchestrated by a highly secret and sophisticated government agency in order to create a climate of fear within the general population so that they can eventually simulate the conditions for a false-flag alien invasion. This scenario was supposedly told to Carol Rosin, who was a close confidant to former Nazi rocket scientist Werner von Braun. Let’s not forget that it was Nazi scientists like von Braun brought over to the US under Project Paperclip, who created the Apollo V-2 rocket program that would eventually carry US astronauts to the moon in 1969. Or, so we’re told. There’s a lot of conspiratorially-minded people out there, who question whether we ever did go to the moon. Without getting into that particular controversy too deeply at least for now, I find it interesting that what few people talk about are the reports by some of the Apollo astronauts of seeing strange UFOs in their various flights and other weird alien-like structures within our own solar system even. I personally think that whatever the astronauts saw up there spooked them plenty and may explain why NASA hasn’t gone back to the moon since 1974, assuming of course they ever did in the first place, since they found out it was already occupied and they weren’t welcome. Apparently, the Russians got the same message via various incidents in their history.

Edgar Mitchell on the Moon

Without digressing too much further, we’re still left with a rather interesting footnote in Ufology with the discovery of the government funded AATIP that initially would seem to indicate that the Pentagon views UFOs as a potential threat. Certainly, UFOs being seen flying on numerous occasions over ICBM sites would have sparked an investigation even if, as Robert Salas has pointed out, they appeared to be shutting down our nuclear weapons capacity to prevent a nuclear holocaust rather than cause one. Whenever NORAD or FAA radar picks up an unidentified blip on their screen, there is a natural tendency to be both curious and fearful, especially given how fast UFOs have been known to fly. Military jets are scrambled, but they’re clearly no match in their feeble attempts to intercept. In conjunction with the recent revelations about the AATIP, an organization set up for greater UFO disclosure called “To the Stars Academy of Arts and Sciences” founded by former Blink-182 musician Tom DeLonge also released a video shot back in 2004 off the coast of San Diego of a F/A-18 that spotted an oblong-shaped UFO. It makes me wonder- “How many more videos like this one are still being suppressed from disclosure?” Fighter pilots are sworn to secrecy and security oaths by their respective branches and rarely discuss what they’ve seen even in retirement. Even commercial pilots, who have sightings, are threatened to keep quiet by the airlines, the pilots association, and shadowy individuals of unknown intelligence origins known to debrief these pilots and scare them into perpetual silence.

Fortunately, however, more witnesses and whistle-blowers are coming out about what they’ve seen as they enter the winter of their years in many cases. One of the authors of the New York Times piece, Leslie Kean, documented some of the most important of these cases in her book given that it focused on very credible airline and fighter pilots along with witnesses as high up the military chain-of-command as General. When you add to that list esteemed members of the academic and scientific community, it becomes increasingly difficult to dismiss the entire phenomenon as a misidentification of the planet Venus or flocks of birds as various debunkers have tried to do over the years. So, does this revelation of a government funded project to research and analyze the threat assessment posed by UFOs constitute “disclosure”? Not really. But, it certainly constitutes a kind of “confirmation” that there is still an interest (despite the denials) of this particular phenomenon within the Congress, unacknowledged intelligence community, and certain members in the Pentagon given that, while the funding dried up for the project in 2012, the research and analysis is on-going according to Luis Elizondo who’s gone on to join DeLonge’s circle at “To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science”.

Grey Alien Face

 


What Really Happened in the Las Vegas Shooting?

Running in Las Vegas

With Halloween already upon us, it has been a month now since the deadliest mass shooting incident in US history (we’re told killing some 58 and injuring 546 people) that took place October 1st in Las Vegas, Nevada. And yet, in spite of all that elapsed time, the “official narrative” of what happened makes virtually no plausible sense whatsoever. Also, though no surprise to me, it’s still no less disheartening to realize that the mainstream media has once again failed miserably to illuminate that day’s events with any real investigation into why a well-to-do real estate mogul with no previous history of criminal activity would decide one day to kill a bunch of people at an outdoor country western music festival called Route 91 Harvest Music Fest from the 32nd story of his room inside the Mandalay Casino Hotel. The notion that he simply “snapped” due to debts he had accrued from playing video slot machines or whatever else the media has been trying to push as a possible motive comes across as utter nonsense. Therefore, it is up to the fiercely independent media of on-line investigators, like myself. to try to make sense out of the Las Vegas mass shooting, since we’re simply never going to get the larger story from either the mainstream media or the FBI.

First, let’s begin with the man they claim was responsible…Stephen Paddock. Just who the hell is this guy? No matter what source you look at including the New York Times, absolutely nothing would indicate that Stephen Paddock fits the profile of a “lone nut” that would commit these crimes. He is described as a wealthy real estate mogul, who owns multiple homes around the world, and likes to gamble when he is in Las Vegas, which is at least once a month. His brother, Eric Paddock, listed his home address as Mesquite, Nevada, but there are various reports of him moving around a lot from house to house often looking for places that are quiet and secluded from public scrutiny. Naturally, people would become curious as to just what kinds of activities Paddock was involved in that might necessitate these kinds of measures (which I’ll get to in a moment), but there is certainly no indication that he was violent in any way.

Stephen Paddock Face

Where it gets interesting is when we learn that Steven Paddock used to work for either a government entity or a government-affiliated company. So, for instance, he worked for the US Postal Service as well as an auditor for the IRS. He also worked for a company called Morton-Thiokol, which was the company that designed the infamous O-Rings that failed leading to the Challenger Shuttle explosion. According to investigators into the 1986 Challenger Shuttle catastrophe, scientists within Morton-Thiokol tried to warn NASA about the high probability of failure of their O-Rings within the rocket boosters in cold weather, but NASA refused to postpone the launch with obviously disastrous results. It’s also been reported that Paddock used to work for the giant aerospace corporation, Lockheed Martin. A recent CIA whistle-blower into the Deep State and the Secret Government, Kevin Shipp, said that Lockheed Martin is so large and powerful that it is like a separate state within a state. So far, all we’ve proved is that Stephen Paddock held some pretty high positions within some pretty powerful corporations that, in the case of Lockheed Martin in particular, have very deep connections with US intelligence. I maintain that, if there was a proper investigation done into Paddock’s job history, these kinds of connections would have definitely put him “on the radar” so-to-speak of these same intelligence agencies for use as either a sheep-dipped undercover operative or an informant asset.

In regards to Paddock working as an intelligence agent or asset of some kind, one of the darker theories is that he was involved in a child trafficking ring using his own 2004 created Domestic LLC called Paradise Ranch 21, which although incorporated in the State of Nevada had a base of operations in the Philippines. We do know that Stephen Paddock had a pilot’s license along with multiple planes that he stored in hangers like the one in Henderson, NV and that he had visited the Philippines many times with his girlfriend, Ms. Marilou Delaney, who investigators initially named as “a person of interest” and later flew back to the US for questioning. She was in the Philippines when the shooting occurred. It’s fairly well known that the Philippines is a popular destination for “sex tourism” and “child trafficking” for that purpose. This begs the question- “Was Paddock’s company Paradise Ranch 21 being used as front for the trafficking of children including a brothel in the Philippines that he owned?” And, if indeed this is the case, what role did this have to play, if any, in the Las Vegas Shooting?

Paradise Ranch Entrance

We might also ask, “What other clues there are that would suggest Paddock wasn’t working alone?” Well, for one thing, how else could you explain how multiple bags of luggage filled with guns and ammunition were able to be hauled up to his room without triggering the curiosity of Mandalay Bay’s security and surveillance system? After all, we all know by now that casinos like Mandalay Bay have thousands of cameras everywhere in the hotel, as many as 3,000 cameras by some estimates just in that hotel/casino alone, and yet we haven’t seen any raw footage released of Steven Paddock outside or inside the hotel. Why not? Also, according to Steve Wynn (Chairman and CEO of Wynn Resorts) who owns several hotel/casinos, nobody (presumably Paddock included) would normally have access to a service elevator at the hotel unless accompanied by security personnel. So, if Stephen Paddock was able to haul up so many bags filled with guns and ammo to his 32nd story room without attracting suspicion because he was using the “service elevator” of the hotel, who gave him access to this elevator and why? There are also witnesses that claim someone else was using the electronic key to the room where Paddock was claimed to be staying and bringing up several bags. Who was this person and what was their role in the shooting that occurred?

Steve Wynn

Looking at the room service receipt, it’s clear to me that there were at least two people in the room ordering food, and yet there doesn’t seem to be any interest into trying to find out just who this second person was, let alone why they were there in the first place. What’s also pretty clear to me, when you look at just how stressed out and anxious Sheriff Joseph Lombardo is during press conferences, is that the Las Vegas Police Department isn’t being allowed to conduct a proper investigation into what happened that day, since the FBI is running the show…i.e. cover-up. And yet, Sheriff Lombardo still let it slip that Stephen Paddock must have had help to pull it all off, which naturally implies a wider conspiracy afoot. The more you investigate the Las Vegas Shooting, the more it appears that Stephen Paddock was likely working as an intelligence asset on behalf of the ATF and/or FBI to run guns to individual(s) unknown as part of an entrapment scheme or even perhaps as part of an arms deal gone bad. I’ll leave it to you to decide which side of the fence you want to place this operation in, since we’ll probably never have all the facts as to what really took place. However, there is certainly ample precedent with the FBI’s notorious “Fast and Furious” program that funneled heavy weaponry into the hands of known Mexican drug cartels. We’re told that it was part of an investigation to find out where they ended up, but through a Congressional inquiry into the operation…this has proved to be a farce. Well, we know where they ended up! What we don’t know is why the DEA, ATF, and FBI needed to run guns to the Mexican cartels in the first place, particularly when you consider that no major arrests were made after the fact, and they’ve continued to stonewall investigations ever since.

Las Vegas Sheriff

So, if indeed Stephen Paddock was acting as a go-between front man in an arms deal being run by the FBI, then, of course, the FBI certainly wouldn’t want the public to know anything about their involvement in the operation after it blew up in their face. And, no matter what his involvement may ultimately have been, it would be much easier for the ATF/FBI’s image if Stephen Paddock is the dead “fall guy” for the entire thing and not reveal that there were a number of different shooters seen and heard that day, who might have realized that Paddock was working as an informant and decided then and there to take their bloody revenge on innocent bystanders, not to mention Paddock himself. After all, admitting that there were multiple shooters would blow what’s left of the official narrative right out of the water, and yet this is exactly what several witnesses claim they heard and saw that night, including video from a cab driver indicating shots being fired from the 4th floor of the Mandalay Bay as well from a different trajectory.

One on-line investigator makes a very cogent case that Paddock’s strange movements in flying out to Phoenix, where the ATF has a major base of operations, and driving back into Las Vegas is indicative of a gun-running operation being run by ATF and/or FBI. If Paddock was operating as the front man for these buy operations, it would make complete logical sense to do them inside a Las Vegas Casino Hotel, where any dirty money being transacted could be easily laundered through the casino poker chips and once exchanged after playing a few hands of Blackjack come out clean. Interestingly enough, there’s even reason to believe that the CEO of MGM Resorts International, James Murren, that also owns Mandalay Bay knew this was going on and had reason to believe that it was going to backfire soon, when you consider how much stock in MGM Resorts International he sold in the weeks prior to the Las Vegas Shooting. What did this guy know at the time that the rest of us didn’t? This is yet another possible avenue of inquiry in attempting to discover just who the real gun buyers, and hence likely culprits of the violence that erupted that day, were, especially when you consider how much money the Saudis have invested in Las Vegas casinos like the MGM Grand, Luxor, Tropicana, Bellagio, and Mandalay Bay.

Mandalay Bay Hotel and Casino

Another big tip off that this entire “investigation” is merely window dressing for the FBI stage managing a massive cover-up in order to cover their ass is the strange case of the so-called Mandalay Bay security officer, Jesus Campos. If you remember correctly, authorities initially claimed that security guard Campos was shot right around 9:59 p.m., as he approached Paddock’s door right as the first shots were being fired. Later, this was changed to Campos being shot later at around 10:07 p.m., since he claimed that he was unable to breach a barricaded door until then. What I find even more curious than the changing time-line of Jesus Campos is why Stephen Paddock only fired for 10 minutes sometime shortly after 10 p.m., but LVPD SWAT wasn’t able to breach his suite until 11:20 p.m. that night! However, right around the time when reporters were trying to put Jesus Campos on every national TV news program in the country to get the full story as to what happened, Campos disappeared from public view. Then, inexplicably, when he came back into public view…he gave what would be his one and only interview with longtime celebrity sycophant talk show host, Ellen DeGeneres, who unsurprisingly simply praised him as a hero. She also failed to ask the hard questions as to the ever changing time-line of that night or why he fled to Mexico instead of a hospital after he was supposedly shot in the leg only to return to the US a week later. Given that Ellen has paid endorsement deals with MGM Resorts International Inc., the parent company of Mandalay Bay, it would appear, on the surface, that the casino (in addition to the FBI and ATF) is also trying to cover their asses in making sure that they aren’t held financially liable for the dead and injured for their role in this major massacre.

Jesus Campos on Ellen

Granted, I certainly don’t claim to have all the answers or even most of them. But, what I do have (that most of the mainstream media apparently do not with any real conviction) are important questions that have not been answered with any degree of satisfaction as to what really occurred in Las Vegas on the night of October 1st, 2017. Therefore, what I’ve tried to show in this article is that the official narrative as to what happened that night simply doesn’t add up in any way, shape, or form and that an alternative scenario (such as an ATF/FBI gunrunning entrapment scheme gone bad) is therefore necessary. Naturally, you’re free to choose whatever scenario that makes the most sense to you, as nothing is nailed down for sure in this highly strange case of continually changing and competing narratives. From what I’ve been hearing, there are at least 5 major alternative theories as to what happened thus far, and I wouldn’t be surprised if this number continues to grow, as is usually the case when so many pressing questions continue to persist without any reasonable answers from officialdom.


Was Princess Diana’s Death an Accident or Assassination?

People's Princess

This country celebrated a rare solar eclipse on August 21st, 2017, and especially in a line moving midday from Oregon to South Carolina in what is known as the “path of totality” the sun is (for a few minutes at least) completely obscured by the moon. However, 20 years ago, a different bright and shining light was not only veiled in temporary shadow but completely snuffed out forever. I’m speaking, of course, of the Princess of Wales, Diana, who died in Paris on August 31st, 1997 after a horrific car crash. Unfortunately, after one French inquest and three more British inquests, there are still serious questions that remain in any serious researcher’s mind about what really happened that fateful night. And, when these questions aren’t satisfactorily answered by these “official” inquests and investigations and/or not made available to the public, then we turn to see whether there was in fact a conspiracy to kill Diana and start asking things like, “Who had the means, motive, and opportunity to assassinate Diana and why would she have been targeted?” I don’t presume to know all or even most of the answers, and (even if I did) this case is far too complex and large in scope to encapsulate it in a small article. To really understand the ins and outs takes years of study and research that would presumably be laid out in a book or series of books. This was done in a series of nine books by New Zealand researcher, John Morgan. But, we can at least ask a few questions that don’t add up and look at where they might lead should we follow up.

Most mainstream media accounts, including all the TV specials running lately on Diana, would have us believe that Dodi al Fayed’s personal driver, Henri Paul, was drunk when he left the Ritz Carlton to go to Dodi’s apartment with Diana. However, this scenario is seriously flawed in my view. Why? First, take a look at the video of Henri Paul shortly before the entourage left the Ritz Hotel. He doesn’t look the least bit drunk. If his BAC (Blood Alcohol Content) was really as high as over three times the French legal limit the coroner said it was not to mention the very high level of carbon monoxide found in his blood, he would have had a hard time even walking upright let alone be able to drive a car. And, were he really that drunk, is it plausible to think that Dodi al Fayed, Diana, and Dodi’s bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones, who was the only surviver in the car that night, would have all allowed Henri Paul to drive them that night? It simply makes no sense whatsoever, and gives Dodi’s father Mohamed al Fayed justification in questioning whether the blood that was tested by a British pathologist was really that of Henri Paul to begin with or whether it was switched out with someone else.

Diana and Entourage at the Ritz Carlton

Now, we know from the official story that once everyone had decided to leave out the back entrance to try to avoid the paparazzi camped out front to snap a picture of Diana and Dodi together, there were at least a few savvy photographers that saw through the ruse of parking the bait car in the front while exiting out the rear. It was supposedly these paparazzi that gave chase on motorcycle that were blamed for the high speed chase down the Place de Concorde and through the Pont d’Alma tunnel, which led to the Mercedes losing control near the entrance and plowing into the 13th pillar. This is where the story gets very dicey in terms of knowing exactly what happened right before the moment of impact precisely because there is evidence of a massive cover-up by the French police and later by the British investigators like Scotland Yard in order to make sure that the public never learns the truth. So, while we know that Henri Paul was taking a circuitous route back to his apartment rather than the quickest route (we’re told) in order to confuse and lose whatever paparazzi that might still be following them, we’ll never know how the Mercedes came to smash into the 13th pillar inside the Pont d’Alma tunnel given that all 17 CCTV security cameras leading towards the tunnel went suspiciously “off line” right before the crash occurred or so we’re told by French authorities. Needless to say, this seems so utterly beyond any coincidence as to make me conclude that the French were, at minimum, co-conspirators in Diana’s death.

Final Journey of Diana

Also, after 2 years of a massive French inquest into the crash producing some 6,000 pages of the French Public Prosecutor’s investigation, nobody outside the top brass of the French police and Department of Justice are allowed to look at the report. Even the “Executive Summary” of the report fails to answer some basic questions and must therefore be seen in the same light as previous investigations we’re all familiar with in this country like the Warren Commission Report and the 9/11 Commission Report, which were both huge whitewashes. This begs the question, “What exactly are the French hiding?” Well, for one thing, Mohamed al Fayed was able to determine that the NSA had been monitoring Diana and is holding onto to more than 1,000 still classified documents about Princess Diana. However, the French Public Prosecutor made no attempt to discover what the NSA knew and when they knew it. And, nowhere in the 6,000 pages of the French investigation did they attempt to explain how Henri Paul (whose personal salary was £20,000) manage to have 1.2 million francs in 13 different bank accounts or where exactly the money had come from. This could be explained, however, had Henri Paul been working in part with French and British intelligence as some researchers have claimed. And finally, the French police also failed to question several witnesses that could have provided key testimony of those crucial few minutes right before the crash.

Another tract of the investigation that ought to be taken into Diana’s death was a) Why would she have been targeted to be killed? and (if she was instead of it merely being an accident) b) Who are the likely culprits of such a high level hit? Answering the first question gets us a long way toward answering the second, in my humble estimation. While Diana’s marriage to Prince Charles in 1981 was billed as the “Wedding of the Century”, her separation from Charles 15 years later was, like most divorces, bitter, sad, and emotionally devastating for those involved. Royal insiders, however, will tell you that it was no secret that Prince Charles was never really in love with Diana but simply needed to get married and have children to fulfill what can be understood as a bloodline oath to the Crown. In other words, the British Monarchy sees it as part of your “royal duty” to father an heir to the Crown in order to continue the Windsor bloodline, which if you listen to David Icke isn’t even entirely human. And while it isn’t necessary to go there, you can’t help but wonder if there isn’t some truth to the Queen’s reptilian heritage in how she reacted to the sudden shocking death of Diana waiting a full five days before she even addressed the nation in her usual cold manner. It was left to then British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, to address the British people pouring their hearts out at Kensington Palace, while the Royals were sequestered in their summer palace ostensibly to protect the children. Yeah right!

Charles and Diana Schism

When Diana gave birth to Prince William (heir to the throne) and later Harry (who might not even be Charles’ son at all), she was no longer useful to the Royal Family as a breeder for the Windsor bloodline. But, when she officially separated from Prince Charles so that he could be with Camilla Parker-Bowles (whom he later did in fact marry), and she could date whomever she wanted to, I believe she was considered to be expendable at that point. The final straw very likely came when she began seriously seeing Dodi al Fayed, an Egyptian Muslim, and then gasp was very likely going to be engaged to marry Dodi, since there is evidence that he had bought her an engagement ring in Paris at a high-end jewelry store and was going to propose to her that weekend. Can you imagine how profoundly incensed the Royals would have been at the prospect of Diana, still beloved the world over and considered the “People’s Princess” a symbol of British Anglophile supremacy, married to an Arab, who would become the stepfather of the heir to the British throne?!

Let’s also not forget that Princess Diana was a powerful force for change in her own right and was instrumental in shining her light into some very dark corners of the world such as the Bosnian war, where she successfully lobbied for a global ban on land mines. According to one woman who worked as an MI-5 agent, she was even talking about taking on the plight of the Palestinians and their bid for statehood. Had she pushed for this, as she had the land mine issue before the U.N., I have no doubt that Israeli Mossad would have seen her as a national security threat and taken steps against her in a plot for her assassination. However, the evidence for this simply isn’t in yet for us to make a solid determination, but it’s interesting to consider nonetheless. Given the “knowns” of her relationship with Dodi, their likely upcoming nuptials, and her possible pregnancy or at least soon to be pregnancy with Arab Dodi al Fayed’s child, I surmise that those most likely tasked with carrying out the hit on Diana, making it look like an accident, and subsequently covering it up with the help of the French would have been British MI-6 working alongside a hit team of British SAS. And, the order would have come from either Prince Philip or Queen Elizabeth II, either of which could have reasonably given it once Diana had run afoul of Royal favor.

In fact, there is now a former MI-5 man, David Shayler, who has come out and said as much on global television. There’s even been speculation as to how it was done. Leaving out the question of just who Henri Paul and bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones were really working for within the alphabet soup of intelligence agencies that is bad enough, a man with MI-6 or SAS on a motorcycle or in a car could have drove up to either the passenger or driver’s side window and flashed an intensely bright light into the eyes of Henri Paul as a way of temporarily blinding him just long enough for him to miss a sharp turn at Pont d’Alma tunnel entrance. We do know that in addition to this scenario described by a former MI-6 man…the Mercedes was definitely hit by a white Fiat Uno prior to hitting the pillar inside the tunnel, which was later found by detectives working for Mohamed al Fayed and therefore was very likely a part of the actual hit squad itself. The Fiat Uno was traced to a photographer by the name of James Anderson, who was known to have worked for MI-6. He was also known to have been in Paris the day of the crash and flew out the following day to Cosica. Unfortunately, we’ll never know the extent of his involvement as two years after the crash James Anderson was found dead with two gunshot wounds ruled a suicide by the police.

We’re also told in “official accounts” that when the ambulance arrived Diana was still alive in the Mercedes. The driver Henri Paul was dead, Dodi was dead, Trevor Rees-Jones was alive and survived the crash, and Princess Diana was still alive and breathing. But, we are also told that the ambulance stayed inside the tunnel for well over an hour (a full 81 minutes). When it finally left with Diana (having supposedly been worked on life support by EMS in their vehicle for over an hour) it took the ambulance about 30 more minutes just to reach the hospital driving at 12 MPH that was only a few minutes away. Shortly thereafter, she was pronounced dead. My only question is- “Why in the hell did it take them so goddamn long to get to the hospital?” Apologists for the accident theory claim that the French have a completely different way of treating patients in that they prefer to treat someone at the scene of the accident rather than rush them to the hospital. Again, even by French standards, this makes no logical sense. Any EMS personnel will tell you that when seconds can make the difference between someone living and dying, a person suffering from severe trauma and blood loss from a car crash has to get to the emergency room of a hospital as quickly as possible, since you can’t perform extensive surgery in an ambulance. So, a defibrillator can get your heart started, and the EMS people can get you on some oxygen and an I.V. to help get you breathing and hydrated. But, they’re usually just trying to stabilize you long enough so that you don’t go into shock and die of blood loss. The anesthesiologist administration of pain killers, stitches, surgery to remove any foreign objects, and blood transfusions that have to be given to replace the pints you lost in a crash of this magnitude are done inside a hospital and not in the back of an ambulance.

Crashed Mercedes from Diana Death

So, this notion that it’s done completely different in France than it’s done in the US from an emergency situation just doesn’t add up with me. It looked to me like it was being stalled intentionally, until she eventually died of blood loss. The real question given what we know about how it was stalled is- “Who gave the order to stall the ambulance reaching the hospital, and who does that person work for?” Answer that question, and you’ve practically solved the murder mystery. Perhaps, though, we can answer a different question that leads us into the cover-up a key postmortem autopsy. Tellingly, Princess Diana’s body was embalmed and no autopsy was ever performed. However, if we can show that the autopsy results of the high levels of carbon monoxide, anti-depressants, and alcohol in the blood of the driver, Henri Paul, was essentially falsified and manufactured so as to make it appear that he was completely incompetent to drive that night- then finding out who the coroner worked for would also lead us towards the culprits in the crime. And, wouldn’t you know it, all fingers point back to Buckingham Palace, when we learn that the man responsible was Dr. John Burton, who was the Royal Coroner. His role, along with the examining pathologist, in this case are key in the ensuing cover-up of Diana’s death. Furthermore, and even more damning, he called the inquests into Dodi and Diana’s deaths a “waste of time and public money.” He was later replaced by Mr. Michael Burgess.

Make no mistake about it, it is the British Aristocracy and the price of upholding their obscene opulent elitism that is the true waste of time and money. But, for a brief while, Diana’s story was one of living out the fairy tale of practically every little girl only to have reality come crashing in, in this case quite literally some 20 years ago. She was indeed loved precisely because of her compassionate humanity and ability to relate to the everyday suffering of regular people the world over. And, although her memory has not been well served by the elite powers of evil that prevent the true cause of her death from being widely known, the legacy of her inspirational life will continue to enrich those for whom she touched over her brief years on the planet.

 

 


How the Israel Lobby Controls US Foreign Policy in the Middle East

Palestinian Child Murdered by Israelis

Last night on C-SPAN 3 at 1 a.m., I saw a very little seen hour-long documentary called “The Palestinian People Do Have Rights”. It was produced by the United Nations back in 1979 and was remarkable for focusing on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from a Palestinian viewpoint, which almost never happens in the US given how entirely one-sided our media is for the State of Israel. However, this isn’t the case necessarily with the rest of the world even among some of our European allies, who have a more nuanced perspective in the Middle East. But, unfortunately for this country, the entirety of what I’ll call the “Israeli Lobby” prevents any meaningful debate from taking place not only within the insular and historically-warped perspective of MSM propaganda but also within the White House, Congress, and the bulk of US academia as well. And, it is this fact which ought to (particularly a so-called open democratic Republic as ours) spur Americans to question the legitimacy of the very involvement of any US authority figure in the Israeli occupation of Palestine.

Beyond the question of legitimacy of America’s role in mediating the conflict through the years, it behooves us to understand how and why Israel has been able to get pretty much everything they want in terms of expanding illegal settlements, billions in US foreign aid money, the wanton killing of Palestinian civilians for alleged “self-defense”, and the overall continued genocidal Apartheid occupation of a brutalized population in the prison-like ghettos of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. In other words, the situation as it exists in the occupied territories is neither good for the US or Israel. Unfortunately, the Palestinian people are prevented from achieving self-determination under a sovereign state of their own, while remaining in a constant state of anxiety and terror from Israeli air strikes in a homeland they are treated worse than diseased cattle in.

Palestinian Land Loss

A good place to start to gain some degree of political perspective as to just how powerful the Israeli Lobby actually is in this country, as well as the ways in which it exercises its considerable power within the Washington beltway and beyond is The Washington Report. This alternative media source sponsored their annual conference this year at the National Press Club on March 24th, 2017 that was well attended but of course not discussed in mainstream discourse. Speakers included such luminaries as Grant F. Smith, Prof. John Mearsheimer (who co-wrote The Israel Lobby along with Stephen Walt), Hanan Ashrawi, filmmaker Tom Hayes, former Congressmen Jim Moran (D-VA) and Nick Rahall (D-WV), and many others. I’d like to highlight some of speakers more salient points given during their respective talks, which have all been posted for free on YouTube.

First, you might be wondering- “What exactly is the Israel Lobby?” It is actually more than AIPAC. Based on the research the Grant Smith did for his book Big Israel, he says:

“I reveal a $3.7 billion nonprofit ecosystem on track to reach $6.3 billion by 2020. With 14,000 employees, 350,000 volunteers, but a paying membership of approximately 774,000, it is this nonprofit lobby along with overlapping campaign-finance infrastructure- whether it is large individual donors, stealth political action committees- that provide Israel with the US support that it would otherwise not have.”

Octopus Stranglehold of the Israel Lobby

Now, when you add to that formidable force organizations like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), B’nai B’rith, Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), think tanks like the Washington Institute for Near East Policy and American Enterprise Institute (AEI), and the many other Jewish NGO’s and Israeli-connected companies in this country especially within media empires, it becomes abundantly clear just how powerful the Israel Lobby really is and how it can wield such disproportionate influence on American foreign policy in the Middle East. And, the US taxpayer pays for it all to the tune of at least $254 billion in known foreign aid money to Israel, more than any other country in the world.

All this free foreign aid money that is sent to Israel with no strings attached along with appropriations for the latest in American technology and military weaponry not only comes at a hefty price, in terms of what it could have been spent on in this country, but it’s also a heavy price paid in the blood of the Palestinian people, which naturally greatly weakens our moral standing in the eyes of the rest of the world. In fact, in a great many quarters, Israel is seen as even more racist than Apartheid South Africa. So, for instance, as Prof. John Mearsheimer relates in his speech:

“Speaking of South Africa, there are a number of individuals who were well acquainted with the situation in that racist state before it collapsed who believe that the situation in Israel is worse. John Dugard, the eminent South African law professor, says that the crimes against the Palestinians are, to quote, ‘infinitely worse than those committed by the apartheid regime in South Africa’. He is hardly the lone voice in that regard. For anyone who doubts how bad life can be for the Palestinians living under Israeli control, one only has to consider what happened in Israel’s three major assaults against Gaza over the past decade: Operation Cast Lead, Operation Pillar of Defense, and Operation Protective Edge. Because of time constraints, I will focus exclusively on the first of those operations, Cast Lead, which took place in the weeks before President Obama was inaugurated in 2009. Israel forces killed about 1,400 Palestinians, of whom roughly 1,200 were civilians; 350 of those civilians were children. In contrast, 13 Israelis were killed. The ratio of Palestinians to Israelis killed in that operation is 108:1. That’s not a war in my lexicon- that’s a massacre. I might add that 6,300 Palestinian homes were destroyed, contributing to the 600,000 tons of rubble that littered Gaza when the shooting ended. The U.N. commissioned an investigation in the wake of that conflict which was headed by the distinguished South African jurist Richard Goldstone. The final report, sometimes referred to as the Goldstone Report, concluded that Israel had engaged in ‘a deliberately disproportionate attack designed to punish, humiliate and terrorize a civilian population.’ It went on to accuse Israel of committing war crimes and possible crimes against humanity.”

Children Victims of Operation Cast Lead

Now, ask yourself how much of this assault you even heard about on CNN, MS-NBC, FOX, ABC, CBS, etc.? I’m willing to bet that most of the news was still fawning and deifying the “Cult of Personality” portrait they had painted for Barrack Obama, which has been completely reversed for the Trump administration. Attitudes towards celebrity presidents notwithstanding, what doesn’t change between various administrations is America’s unwavering commitment to Israel’s unilateral “right of self-defense”, which is to say that it can use any excuse it wants to justify slaughtering as many Palestinians they want. And, regardless of how bad it appears before the U.N. Security Council, the US will always veto any resolution that seeks a just and equitable peace. So, even though it’s been 100 years since the Balfour Declaration, practically 70 years since the creation of the State of Israel by the U.N., and 50 years since the 6-Day War of 1967, when an American communications vessel, the U.S.S. Liberty, was deliberately attacked in international waters by Israeli aircraft fighter jets and submarines with the sick connivance of President LBJ, as I’ve written about previously. The “special relationship” with Zionist Israel remains the same no matter who becomes president or what the political makeup of Congress may be. After all, in the lead up to the 2016 election, both Hillary Clinton and Donald J. Trump both spoke in gushing and glowing terms of their commitment to Israel at the AIPAC convention, and the only question was how much more in love they were with Israel than their opponent. So, under those circumstances, does anyone seriously think that things will change with our fundamental relationship with Israel under a Trump administration? Go watch his address to AIPAC and see for yourself.

Trump Speaks at AIPAC

Obviously, this can be a very complex and hotly contested issue, especially when you start focusing on the details of such things as border security, Israeli settlements on Palestinian land, political Zionism as a form of colonialism, ethnic cleansing, and all the the other myriad issues that surround this conflict. But, when you simply focus on how and why the US has remained so steadfast over the years in complete support of Israel to the ultimate detriment of the Palestinians in brokering a lasting peace, the matter (I think) isn’t nearly as complex as it first seems. With huge resources and practically unlimited capital, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) tracks every single politician’s vote on every single bill that even remotely affects Israel and scores politicians accordingly. Those that score high get campaign money and support. Those that score low get tagged as “Anti-Semitic” by their media moles and propaganda hacks, and their political opponents suddenly find themselves much better funded than before.

AIPAC Logo

If it’s considered important enough to oust a suspected enemy of the State of Israel, orchestrated programs can involve any number of dirty tricks to include black mail, bribery, frame jobs, cyber attacks and, of course, threats to one’s character, livelihood, and even life. Again, it’s all a question of severity and how much of a threat (or rather perceived threat) someone in an established powerful position is to what Israel views as their national interests, i.e. Machiavellian dominance. You can bet that what works well for CIA goes double for Mossad. It’s not surprising, therefore, that both countries (no matter how friendly they are with one another) spy on each other all the time. But, what should be shocking, when you delve into the matter, is that the US is giving Israel something around $6 billion a year in part to do just that.

 

 


The Real Conspiracy to Kill Dr. Martin Luther King

Recently, the anniversary of the Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. assassination occurred, and come 2018…it will be the 50 year anniversary of that tragic day on April 4th, 1968 when King was shot dead standing on the balcony of the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee. In spite of the “official” news account that pinned the assassination on a poor white petty criminal named James Earl Ray, the real story of how, why, and what actually occurred to America’s favorite Civil Rights leader isn’t nearly as simple as the story of a racist “lone nut” that sought to silence King’s dream forever. The real tragedy goes beyond the death of one influential man, however, and it is more than a little telling that we are as a nation still living the bitterness, resentments, and occasional violent flare ups of racial division as the events of Ferguson and others prove all too often these days as the enmity between the police and black America continues to grow with no end in sight. Therefore, I would argue that the lessons of the Civil Rights movement have yet to be fully learned on all sides of the racial divide, and there is much work to be done in order to achieve anything close to a peace that comes from true justice being served.

With that in mind, let’s explore the real conspiracy of the MLK assassination from several different angles in order to get a better grasp on this crucial period and personage in history. We can certainly demolish the myth of that day and the so-called “shooter”, James Earl Ray, as it is now clearer than ever that he was the patsy set to be the “fall guy” for the murder. Just who was James Earl Ray anyway? I recently finished reading a book called Truth at Last that was written in part by John Larry Ray, James’ brother, about the rather checkered history of the Ray family, its run-ins with the mob, and the subsequent railroading of James for the King assassination that even the surviving King family doesn’t think he committed.

Truth at Last book cover

Unfortunately, at the time, he admitted to the murder on the recommendation of his then attorney Percy Foreman, since he told his brother that he felt “boxed in”. By that, I mean that he knew the government knew of his shooting a black soldier named Washington back when he was an Army MP during WWII. At the time, it was his job to arrest soldiers for misconduct such as going AWOL, but apparently the Washington shooting that left him paralyzed for the rest of his life really haunted Ray till the day he died. The severe guilt and trauma that resulted from the Washington shooting likely targeted him as hypnosis candidate and was later exploited into what appears to be a full fledged mind-control program directed against him. There were numerous occasions when James was “experimented” upon by what he called “bug” doctors, i.e. psychiatrists of various stripes. As John Larry Ray reports in Truth at Last:

“According to George McMillan’s book, The Making of an Assassin, U.S. Army records (no longer in existence) show that the army gave James two lumbar punctures (spinal taps)- one in the spring, on March 25, shortly before or around the time his army serial number changed, and the second at about the time James claimed he was sick and missed his shift…Lumbar punctures can be used to administer drugs. Why did the army claim James was ‘drunk’ when he had just had a spinal tap? Did the first spinal procedure have anything to do with the Washington shooting?

James Earl Ray Mugshot

Lyndon Barsten [co-author of the book Truth at Last] suggested to me for the first time that the meaning of the Washington shooting might have been an early mind-control experiment- that this is what haunted James. I have seen FBI documents that show Jimmy later saw two hypnotists in LA, one of whom had been an army intelligence officer during the war. It wouldn’t be like James to tell me he saw these ‘bug’ doctors. But he did tell me that he thought the feds were messing with his mind.”

MK-Ultra Project

Even though most of the documents were ordered destroyed by Richard Helms, thousands of documents were saved from the shredder of the notorious CIA MK-ULTRA program that began shortly after the recruitment of Nazi scientists, spies, and psychiatric doctors into the US National Security State through Operation Paperclip. This is now a very well documented part of history and was even partially investigated by the US Congress in the Church Committee or House Select Committee on Assassinations that looked at the MLK and JFK assassinations. I say “partially” because the driving force behind the Senate investigations into CIA and FBI malfeasance and skulduggery, Mark Lane, quickly came to the conclusion that they weren’t going to amount to much and that the committee was hijacked shortly after it was convened.

Mark Lane, who is famous for writing the first book questioning the Warren Commission findings into the JFK assassination entitled Rush to Judgment, also co-authored a book on the MLK assassination with conspiracy-minded comic, Dick Gregory, called Code Name “Zorro”. You can hear Mark Lane and Hosea Williams, a close confidant of King’s, talking about the conspiracy to kill King on an old Morton Downey Jr. Show that relates the following story. Both Lane and Gregory met with Walter Fauntroy, who was a member of the committee, as did John Larry Ray. According to John, he “said to me many times that he knew the FBI and the CIA were behind the murder of Dr. King.” However, he was “afraid to say it publicly, but Fauntroy, like most black people, instinctively knew the truth.” Much later on, Dick Gregory would show people a video of a Rev. Samuel “Billy” Kyles speaking about his meeting with Dr. King shortly before he is murdered, who makes a Freudian slip in front of TV news cameras by admitting that he “moved out of the way so that he could have a clear shot”. This is a clear demonstration of how the FBI not only had informants but apparently co-conspirators inside of Dr. King’s organization prior to his assassination.

Code Name Zorro Book Cover

One of the programs that HSCA investigated was the FBI Cointelpro Programs orchestrated suspected communists, New Left subversives, and “black nationalists” like the Nation of Islam and the Black Panther Party. Along with more “radical” and “revolutionary” groups, however, the FBI also had King’s Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) heavily infiltrated and offices bugged. FBI Chief, J. Edgar Hoover, had a particular loathing for Dr. King and was able to convince then Attorney General, Robert Kennedy, that the SCLC had people in it that were members of the Communist Party. I’ve yet to see any evidence that King’s closest associates were communists (although it’s possible a couple might have attended a few harmless meetings). The FBI, though, didn’t so much investigate the so-called communist infiltrators as they did King himself, who J. Edgar Hoover was attempting to completely discredit in the minds of the public. At one point, the FBI even went so far as to send him a letter along with sending his wife tapes of him supposedly having an affair with another woman recommending that he commit suicide as the only “honorable” way out.

It is perhaps no small irony that RFK would also be assassinated shortly after King in another orchestrated conspiracy that involved a mind-controlled patsy named Sirhan Sirhan. But, I’ll save that story for another day. Let’s go back to Ray’s narco-hypnotic programming. James Earl Ray made several trips to Montreal, Canada in the 1960’s where he was hypnotically programmed by MK-ULTRA Dr. Ewen Cameron, who worked at Allen Memorial Hospital out of McGill University. In Truth at Last, we read how “James met CIA asset Jules Ron ‘Ricco’ Kimble. According to what Kimble told a BBC team working on a special about the King assassination in 1989, Kimble took James to an identities specialist at the Central Intelligence Agency, who gave James the cover identity of ‘Eric S. Galt’. There was a real Canadian named Eric S. Galt who had a security clearance, and that could have helped the future patsy to walk away from any sticky situations.”

Kimble is currently serving a double life sentence in Texas for murder and is a notorious racist, which is the kind of person the feds want associating with Ray even though there’s nothing in his past that indicates he was a racist despite rumors to the contrary. Anyway, according to Lyndon Barston who spoke with him by phone, “he and James were both directed to a new Holiday Inn, built for the Expo ’67″…where “an older man came out from McGill University’s Allen Memorial Institute to hypnotize” both James and Kimble. Turns out that at this same time, “Allen Memorial Institute at McGill’s housed Subproject 68 of the CIA’s notorious MK-Ultra mind control program. The agency had data from way back in 1948 that James could be controlled. They called on Allen Memorial Institute boss, Dr. Ewen Cameron, to ensure that James was indeed a proper patsy.” Continuing, he says that a FOIA “request to the CIA revealed that Cameron’s security clearance at the agency was bumped up a couple of notches as the machinery of the King murder plot began to turn. Cameron wouldn’t live more than a matter of days after James left Canada in 1967. He died of a reported heart attack up in the mountains.” It’s well known (as the HSCA showed with the poison dart gun) that the CIA is notorious for being able to kill people through chemically-induced heart attacks along with any number of methods of killing and making it appear to be “natural causes”.

Senator Frank Church

As everyone knows, Dr. King was in Memphis to support a sanitation worker’s strike, but Ray was maneuvered into the Memphis boarding house by a man that he called “Raoul” or “Raul”, who had Ray involved in a gun smuggling operation into Mexico. This was the man that was discovered to be Ray’s handler and made sure he was in place at the right time so that he could be the convenient patsy for the assassination after a rifle with Ray’s prints was thrown down at the scene, which ballistics could never match with the actual gun and caliber bullet that actually killed King. All of these inconsistencies and details would have come out had there been a trial that Ray fought for and was denied to the end of his life until William Pepper, who was James’ last attorney, and wrote three books on the MLK assassination would finally do the next best thing and have a trial in the case of The King Family et al vs. Loyd Jowers and Other Unknown Co-Conspirators in 1999. The jury would find James Earl Ray innocent of the King assassination (that was the result of a conspiracy), and the King family was so satisfied with both the trial and verdict that they even posted the entire transcript of the trial on their website. To this day, the mainstream media has completely ignored this historic and groundbreaking piece of jurisprudence history and continues to promote the lies of their typically moronic and myopic “lone nut” theories that have, by now, been resoundingly and convincingly refuted. Case closed.

Martin Luther King Legacy